arXiv:0812.4450v1 [hep-th] 23 Dec 2008
arXiv:0812.4450v1 [hep-th] 23 Dec 2008
arXiv:0812.4450v1 [hep-th] 23 Dec 2008
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
in particular <strong>th</strong>at associated to each cohomology group is an automorphic representation,<br />
leading to an automorphic form. The class of automorphic L-functions contains a special type<br />
of objects, <strong>th</strong>e standard L-functions, which generalize <strong>th</strong>e Hecke L-functions [3]. Modularity<br />
of Hecke L-functions is known in virtue of <strong>th</strong>eir analytic continuation and <strong>th</strong>eir functional<br />
equations [4, 5]. Langlands’ vision <strong>th</strong>us is based on results obtained by Artin and Hecke. While<br />
Artin considered representations ρ of <strong>th</strong>e Galois group Gal(K/Q) of a number field K to define<br />
L-functions L(ρ, s), Hecke had previously introduced L-functions based on certain characters<br />
χ associated to number fields (called Größencharaktere by Hecke, also called algebraic Hecke<br />
characters), whose structure was motivated by an attempt to establish modularity of <strong>th</strong>e L-<br />
function. It turned out <strong>th</strong>at <strong>th</strong>ese a priori different concepts lead to <strong>th</strong>e same object in <strong>th</strong>e sense<br />
<strong>th</strong>at Artin’s L-functions and Hecke’s L-functions agree [6, 7]. Langlands’ conjecture involves<br />
a generalization of <strong>th</strong>e Artin-Hecke framework to GL(n). More precisely, <strong>th</strong>e connection<br />
between geometry and ari<strong>th</strong>metic can be made because representations of <strong>th</strong>e Galois group<br />
can be constructed by considering <strong>th</strong>e ℓ−adic cohomology as a representation space. This<br />
strategy has proven difficult to implement for higher n in general, and in particular in <strong>th</strong>e<br />
context of obtaining a string <strong>th</strong>eoretic interpretation of geometric modular forms beyond <strong>th</strong>e<br />
case of elliptic curves and rigid Calabi-Yau varieties.<br />
For varieties of higher dimensions <strong>th</strong>e results obtained so far indicate <strong>th</strong>at it is more important<br />
to identify irreducible pieces of low rank in <strong>th</strong>e cohomology groups, and to consider <strong>th</strong>e L-<br />
functions of <strong>th</strong>ese subspaces. The difficulty here is <strong>th</strong>at at present <strong>th</strong>ere exists no general<br />
framework <strong>th</strong>at provides guidance for <strong>th</strong>e necessary decomposition of <strong>th</strong>e full cohomology<br />
groups. Never<strong>th</strong>eless, <strong>th</strong>e Langlands program suggests <strong>th</strong>at modularity, and more generally<br />
automorphy, are phenomena <strong>th</strong>at transcend <strong>th</strong>e framework of elliptic curves, and one can ask<br />
<strong>th</strong>e question whe<strong>th</strong>er <strong>th</strong>e me<strong>th</strong>ods described in [8, 9, 10] to establish modularity relations<br />
between elliptic curves and conformal field <strong>th</strong>eories can be generalized to higher dimensional<br />
varieties. Results in <strong>th</strong>is direction have been obtained for extremal K3 surfaces of Brieskorn-<br />
Pham type in ref. [11].<br />
In <strong>th</strong>e present paper <strong>th</strong>e string modularity results obtained previously are extended to all<br />
higher dimensions <strong>th</strong>at are of physical relevance. The idea is to consider particular subgroups<br />
of <strong>th</strong>e intermediate cohomology group of a variety, defined by <strong>th</strong>e representation of <strong>th</strong>e Galois<br />
group associated to <strong>th</strong>e manifold. For manifolds of Calabi-Yau and special Fano type <strong>th</strong>ere<br />
exists at least one nontrivial orbit, defined by <strong>th</strong>e holomorphic n−form in <strong>th</strong>e case of Calabi-<br />
Yau spaces, and <strong>th</strong>e corresponding cohomology group in <strong>th</strong>e case of special Fano manifold.<br />
This orbit will be called <strong>th</strong>e omega motive. The strategy developed here is completely general<br />
3