31.05.2013 Views

arXiv:0812.4450v1 [hep-th] 23 Dec 2008

arXiv:0812.4450v1 [hep-th] 23 Dec 2008

arXiv:0812.4450v1 [hep-th] 23 Dec 2008

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

in particular <strong>th</strong>at associated to each cohomology group is an automorphic representation,<br />

leading to an automorphic form. The class of automorphic L-functions contains a special type<br />

of objects, <strong>th</strong>e standard L-functions, which generalize <strong>th</strong>e Hecke L-functions [3]. Modularity<br />

of Hecke L-functions is known in virtue of <strong>th</strong>eir analytic continuation and <strong>th</strong>eir functional<br />

equations [4, 5]. Langlands’ vision <strong>th</strong>us is based on results obtained by Artin and Hecke. While<br />

Artin considered representations ρ of <strong>th</strong>e Galois group Gal(K/Q) of a number field K to define<br />

L-functions L(ρ, s), Hecke had previously introduced L-functions based on certain characters<br />

χ associated to number fields (called Größencharaktere by Hecke, also called algebraic Hecke<br />

characters), whose structure was motivated by an attempt to establish modularity of <strong>th</strong>e L-<br />

function. It turned out <strong>th</strong>at <strong>th</strong>ese a priori different concepts lead to <strong>th</strong>e same object in <strong>th</strong>e sense<br />

<strong>th</strong>at Artin’s L-functions and Hecke’s L-functions agree [6, 7]. Langlands’ conjecture involves<br />

a generalization of <strong>th</strong>e Artin-Hecke framework to GL(n). More precisely, <strong>th</strong>e connection<br />

between geometry and ari<strong>th</strong>metic can be made because representations of <strong>th</strong>e Galois group<br />

can be constructed by considering <strong>th</strong>e ℓ−adic cohomology as a representation space. This<br />

strategy has proven difficult to implement for higher n in general, and in particular in <strong>th</strong>e<br />

context of obtaining a string <strong>th</strong>eoretic interpretation of geometric modular forms beyond <strong>th</strong>e<br />

case of elliptic curves and rigid Calabi-Yau varieties.<br />

For varieties of higher dimensions <strong>th</strong>e results obtained so far indicate <strong>th</strong>at it is more important<br />

to identify irreducible pieces of low rank in <strong>th</strong>e cohomology groups, and to consider <strong>th</strong>e L-<br />

functions of <strong>th</strong>ese subspaces. The difficulty here is <strong>th</strong>at at present <strong>th</strong>ere exists no general<br />

framework <strong>th</strong>at provides guidance for <strong>th</strong>e necessary decomposition of <strong>th</strong>e full cohomology<br />

groups. Never<strong>th</strong>eless, <strong>th</strong>e Langlands program suggests <strong>th</strong>at modularity, and more generally<br />

automorphy, are phenomena <strong>th</strong>at transcend <strong>th</strong>e framework of elliptic curves, and one can ask<br />

<strong>th</strong>e question whe<strong>th</strong>er <strong>th</strong>e me<strong>th</strong>ods described in [8, 9, 10] to establish modularity relations<br />

between elliptic curves and conformal field <strong>th</strong>eories can be generalized to higher dimensional<br />

varieties. Results in <strong>th</strong>is direction have been obtained for extremal K3 surfaces of Brieskorn-<br />

Pham type in ref. [11].<br />

In <strong>th</strong>e present paper <strong>th</strong>e string modularity results obtained previously are extended to all<br />

higher dimensions <strong>th</strong>at are of physical relevance. The idea is to consider particular subgroups<br />

of <strong>th</strong>e intermediate cohomology group of a variety, defined by <strong>th</strong>e representation of <strong>th</strong>e Galois<br />

group associated to <strong>th</strong>e manifold. For manifolds of Calabi-Yau and special Fano type <strong>th</strong>ere<br />

exists at least one nontrivial orbit, defined by <strong>th</strong>e holomorphic n−form in <strong>th</strong>e case of Calabi-<br />

Yau spaces, and <strong>th</strong>e corresponding cohomology group in <strong>th</strong>e case of special Fano manifold.<br />

This orbit will be called <strong>th</strong>e omega motive. The strategy developed here is completely general<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!