01.06.2013 Views

11-30-11 Work Session - Bonneville Joint School District #93

11-30-11 Work Session - Bonneville Joint School District #93

11-30-11 Work Session - Bonneville Joint School District #93

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3497 North Ammon Road, Idaho Falls, Idaho, 83401 (208) 525-4400 Fax (208) 529-0104 www.d93.k12.id.us<br />

Dr. Charles J. Shackett, Superintendent Dr. Bruce Roberts, Deputy Superintendent<br />

Minutes <strong>Work</strong> <strong>Session</strong><br />

November <strong>30</strong>, 20<strong>11</strong><br />

Board of Trustees Craig Lords Annette Winchester Wendy Horman Kip Nelson DeVere Hunt<br />

<strong>Bonneville</strong> <strong>Joint</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>District</strong> No. 93 is an Equal Opportunity Employer<br />

Marjean McConnell, Assistant Superintendent<br />

I. Call to Order<br />

Chairman Lords called the meeting to order at <strong>11</strong>:47 a.m. Board Members present: Chairman Craig Lords, Vice Chairman Annette Winchester, Treasurer Wendy<br />

Horman, Trustee Kip Nelson and Trustee DeVere Hunt Others in attendance were Superintendent Chuck Shackett, Deputy Superintendent Bruce Roberts, Assistant<br />

Superintendent Marjean McConnell, Chief Financial/Operations Officer April Burton, Director of Operations Todd Hicks, Director of Plant Facilities/Operations Roger<br />

Hill, Health and Safety Coordinator Guy Bliesner, Energy Education Specialist Don Trauntvein, Administrative Assistant Jodi Barnes, Rimrock Principal Dan Page,<br />

Rimrock Secretary Carol Arpke, and Board Clerk Valerie Messick.<br />

II. Items for Discussion<br />

A. Bonding Issues – April Burton<br />

Mrs. Burton presented three bonding scenarios prepared by Seattle Northwest. They were charged with determining the size of bond that could be added<br />

without increasing the combined tax rate and when it would be feasible to bond for a $50.0 million high school without increasing the combined tax rate.<br />

She stated that the Board needs to decide what they want to borrow and then structure a deal for the bond. There is a cash flow issue if we bond so the<br />

current bonds will need to be restructured. Michael Keith from Seattle Northwest was available via telephone to answer the Board’s questions regarding<br />

the bonding scenarios.<br />

The consensus of the Board was that a new high school is off the table for a March bond. The discussion centered on waiting to see what the economy will<br />

do. It is evident that the tax rate will need to be raised when we do build a high school. Mrs. Horman asked if reducing the supplemental levy would help<br />

the cash flow problem. We need the supplemental for operating costs so it would not be feasible to reduce it.<br />

Chairman Lords asked the administration to decide what is needed and hold off on some things until the economy improves. He offered his vision of what<br />

should happen for the bond election. 1) Build an elementary school, 2) Relieve pressure at the high schools with a Professional Technical school using<br />

existing buildings. 3) Remodel <strong>Bonneville</strong> and Hillcrest to utilized space freed up by moving the professional technical programs. 4) Maybe everything else<br />

can wait until we are ready to raise taxes to build a high school the right way. He asked if the roof at Sandcreek is essential and how many busses were<br />

required.<br />

Mrs. Horman stated that she would rather spend money to construct a new building for the professional technical high school rather than piece-meal<br />

existing buildings. She state that she has plans from Blackfoot Charter school that cost only $2 - $3 million to build.<br />

Mr. Hill stated that the roof at Sandcreek is essential but that it could be replaced in smaller portions over the years using Plant Facility funds. Mr. Hicks<br />

stated that he needed no less than six busses because he needs to decommission the gas busses in the fleet. The professional technical high school will<br />

create a need for more busses. The state reimbursement does not help with purchases.<br />

B. Facilities Planning Committee Recommendation – Chuck Shackett<br />

Dr. Shackett asked if there were any questions regarding the Facilities Planning Committee recommendation to the Board. He stated that the meetings<br />

went well and that there was good public input. He led a discussion about the possibility of creating a Technical high school using existing vocational<br />

buildings behind Rocky Mountain Middle <strong>School</strong> and the transportation buildings. This would move Technical programs out of the existing high schools and<br />

free up space in those buildings. Craig Miller is looking at different options for scheduling. Students could be allowed to attend half day at the Technical<br />

high school and half day at their regular high school. Only one bus would run between the high schools during the day. The schedule would probably not<br />

be a block schedule. We would take care of our own students first and then recruit students from other districts to participate. There is a lot of money<br />

available if you have a multi-district consortium. These have been successful around the State. Mrs. Horman asked if there was any other location that is<br />

more central. Dr. Shackett answered that if we use another location it would not be cost effective. Using the existing structures, could be operational this<br />

fall. The programs are already in place, they would just be relocated to one place. The roof and a multipurpose room at Sandcreek Middle <strong>School</strong> and<br />

enlarging the lunchroom at Hillcrest High <strong>School</strong> were discussed. Mr. Bliesner stated that there are currently fire code issues in multiple high school<br />

classrooms. With an increase in enrollment the fire code issues will also increase.<br />

Chairman Lords asked to schedule another work session on December 7 th at 10:00 a.m. He asked the administration to come to that meeting with a<br />

prioritized list of their needs.<br />

C. Legislative Luncheon Topics – Chuck Shackett<br />

Possible topics for the Legislative Luncheon were discussed. <strong>District</strong> 91 will want to talk about their new high school. Mr. Lords and Mr. Lent will discuss<br />

the consolidation study. The legislators will be encouraged to take some of the requirements from last year out of statute. Hopefully they will repeal the<br />

liability insurance tracking requirement and maybe modify the request for personnel records. We will update the <strong>District</strong>’s brag sheet for that meeting.<br />

D. 20<strong>11</strong>-2012 Calendar Drafts – Bruce Roberts<br />

Dr. Roberts presented two drafts of the 2012 - 2013. He explained that the State requires hours of instruction and not days. He stated that we may need to<br />

add some early release time so teachers can work with the data that is available to inform instruction. Mrs. Horman stated that we may need additional<br />

professional development time. Dr. Roberts will talk with a small committee regarding the calendars and make a recommendation to the Board at a future<br />

meeting.


III. Policy for Initial Consideration – Bruce Roberts<br />

A. 3105 Service Animals on <strong>School</strong> Premises<br />

B. 3105P Service Animals on <strong>School</strong> Premises Procedures<br />

C. 3105F Request for Service Animal to Accompany a Student on <strong>School</strong> Premises<br />

Dr. Roberts stated that there has been a request from a parent for a service animal to accompany a student to school. The ADA requires us to modify policies to<br />

allow individuals with disabilities to be accompanied by a service animal. <strong>School</strong>s have a little more latitude in our requirements. We have also involved the parent in<br />

proofing the draft and have addressed some of the concerns with the policy. We will put the policy, procedure, and form on the December 14 th agenda for <strong>30</strong>-day<br />

review<br />

IV. Executive <strong>Session</strong><br />

Chairman Lords asked for a motion to enter into executive session.<br />

MOTION: Annette Winchester made the motion to enter into Executive <strong>Session</strong> per Idaho Code Section 67-2345 (1)(c) To consider deliberations to acquire an<br />

interest in real property which is not owned by a public agency. Kip Nelson seconded. The vote was:<br />

Wendy Horman – Yes<br />

DeVere Hunt – Yes<br />

Kip Nelson – Yes<br />

Anette Winchester – Yes<br />

Craig Lords – Yes<br />

Land Purchase Discussion – Roger Hill<br />

Mr. Hill stated that the pit area has not been compacted as it was pushed in. There three options that could happen to make it acceptable for building. 1) Take the<br />

top 10 – 12 feet off and replace and compact. 2) Place 250 micro piles per building into the ground. 3) Build heavier footings and then provide fill. When asked to<br />

compare the Armstrong property with the pit property, Mr. Hill stated that they both have two accesses and are both in the county. His recommendation would be to<br />

renegotiate on the Armstrong property.<br />

Chairman Lords called for a motion to return to open session.<br />

MOTION: Annette Winchester made the motion to back in to open session. Kip Nelson seconded. The vote was 5 in favor with 0 opposed and 0 abstentions. Motion<br />

passed.<br />

V. Call for Agenda Items for Upcoming Meetings<br />

1. Legislative Luncheon - December 7, 20<strong>11</strong> - <strong>11</strong>:<strong>30</strong> a.m. - <strong>District</strong> Office Board Room<br />

2. Regular Meeting - December 14, 20<strong>11</strong> – 7:00 p.m. - <strong>District</strong> Office Board Room<br />

3. Regular Meeting - January <strong>11</strong>, 2012 – 7:00 p.m. - <strong>District</strong> Office Board Room<br />

X. Adjournment<br />

Chairman Lords called for a motion to adjourn at 2:<strong>30</strong> p.m.<br />

MOTION: Annette Winchester made the motion to adjourn, Kip Nelson seconded. The vote was 5 in favor with 0 opposed and 0 abstentions. Motion passed.<br />

APPROVED: _____________________<br />

Chairperson<br />

ATTESTED: __________________________<br />

Clerk<br />

Date: ___________________

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!