01.06.2013 Views

seawater so2 scrubbing in a spray tower for marine application

seawater so2 scrubbing in a spray tower for marine application

seawater so2 scrubbing in a spray tower for marine application

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

XXXV Meet<strong>in</strong>g of the Italian Section of the Combustion Institute<br />

Literature concern<strong>in</strong>g fuel switch <strong>in</strong> ships and possible post-combustion DeSOx<br />

processes <strong>in</strong> the mar<strong>in</strong>e field is very poor despite SWS has been widely discussed<br />

as a future solution <strong>for</strong> ships. In fact, it has been suggested that SWS is an<br />

economically attractive solution, where <strong>scrubb<strong>in</strong>g</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance relies on <strong>seawater</strong><br />

natural alkal<strong>in</strong>ity [2,3]. The advantages of us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>seawater</strong> <strong>in</strong>volve simple plant<br />

design, no addition of chemicals and no solid by-products. The acidified effluent<br />

can be discharged directly <strong>in</strong>to the sea, after a neutralization step by mix<strong>in</strong>g with<br />

fresh <strong>seawater</strong> and additional <strong>for</strong>ced oxidation of sulfite ions by air blow<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

The use of <strong>seawater</strong> <strong>for</strong> SO2 <strong>scrubb<strong>in</strong>g</strong> has long been recognized as a viable<br />

technology <strong>in</strong> the case of coal power plants. Oikawa et al. [4] describe the technical<br />

and environmental aspects of a <strong>seawater</strong> wet scrubber used as an FGD device <strong>for</strong> a<br />

600 MWe carbon power plant <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. Three different boiler load<strong>in</strong>gs were<br />

considered us<strong>in</strong>g a low sulfur content coal, and an SO2 removal efficiency of 95-<br />

98% was achieved <strong>in</strong> a per<strong>for</strong>ated plate scrubber. Similar figures were reported by<br />

Williams [5], who described an experimental test of SWS carried out <strong>in</strong> a low<br />

sulfur coal plant. Chemical and physical features of the <strong>seawater</strong>-SO2 <strong>in</strong>teraction<br />

are described by Sun et al. [6], who focused on a membrane contactor scrubber.<br />

Only few reports are available where SWS was per<strong>for</strong>med on a real work<strong>in</strong>g ship,<br />

and most of these reports come from <strong>in</strong>dustries <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> SO2 scrubber<br />

production. An <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g experimental report was issued by BP Mar<strong>in</strong>e [7] on the<br />

desulfurization efficiency of a SWS plant <strong>in</strong>stalled on the “Pride of Kent” ship. The<br />

scrubber was <strong>in</strong>stalled <strong>for</strong> a 1 MW auxiliary eng<strong>in</strong>e, record<strong>in</strong>g a removal efficiency<br />

of nearly 100% correspond<strong>in</strong>g to a 36 m 3 /h water flow. Seawater pH values after<br />

<strong>scrubb<strong>in</strong>g</strong> the exhaust gas from the eng<strong>in</strong>e were also recorded: <strong>seawater</strong> pH at the<br />

scrubber exit resulted to be much lower than at the <strong>in</strong>let, due to the <strong>in</strong>teraction with<br />

the acid gases <strong>in</strong> the exhaust gas. Kircher et al. [8] reported on a monitor<strong>in</strong>g<br />

campaign of a SWS scrubber <strong>in</strong>stalled on a 7.2 MW ship burn<strong>in</strong>g HFO. SO2 and<br />

PM emissions were monitored, and the SO2 removal efficiency was about 75%.<br />

Specific requirements <strong>for</strong> maritime SO2 <strong>scrubb<strong>in</strong>g</strong> systems <strong>in</strong>clude: low energy<br />

consumption and pressure drop, simplicity and adaptability to exist<strong>in</strong>g equipment,<br />

stability and eas<strong>in</strong>ess of control. One possible candidate technology meet<strong>in</strong>g these<br />

requirements is <strong>spray</strong> <strong>scrubb<strong>in</strong>g</strong>, which is known to be an effective technology <strong>for</strong><br />

the desulfurization of fuel oil flue gas [9]. Caiazzo et al. [10] recently presented a<br />

<strong>spray</strong> scrubber model focused on the use of <strong>seawater</strong> under mar<strong>in</strong>e diesel eng<strong>in</strong>e<br />

exhaust conditions. Results showed that natural <strong>seawater</strong> alkal<strong>in</strong>ity and <strong>in</strong>ternal<br />

circulation <strong>in</strong> the droplets assure an enhanced SO2 absorption from the gas-phase.<br />

To comply with the MARPOL limits the amount of <strong>scrubb<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>seawater</strong> was found<br />

to be conspicuous, imply<strong>in</strong>g large dimensions of the <strong>scrubb<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>tower</strong>.<br />

This paper reports on the setup of a <strong>seawater</strong> <strong>spray</strong> scrubber and on the<br />

experimental tests carried out under typical exhaust conditions of a mar<strong>in</strong>e diesel<br />

eng<strong>in</strong>e burn<strong>in</strong>g heavy fuel oil. SO2 capture experiments were carried our us<strong>in</strong>g real<br />

<strong>seawater</strong> picked up at about 1000 m from the Naples coast and distilled water, <strong>for</strong><br />

comparison.<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!