02.06.2013 Views

ANESTHESIA & ANALGESIA - IARS

ANESTHESIA & ANALGESIA - IARS

ANESTHESIA & ANALGESIA - IARS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ANESTH ANALG ABSTRACTS<br />

2004; 98; S-1–S-282<br />

S-86<br />

FACTORS AFFECTING THE CONCENTRATION OF CO IN<br />

THE BREATHING CIRCUIT AND THE CONCENTRATION<br />

OF ARTERIAL COHB DURING LOW-FLOW ISOFLURANE<br />

<strong>ANESTHESIA</strong> IN SMOKING AND NON-SMOKING<br />

SUBJECTS<br />

AUTHORS: M. Yamakage, S. Yoshida, S. Iwasaki, M. Mizuuchi,<br />

A. Namiki;<br />

AFFILIATION: Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine,<br />

Sapporo, Japan.<br />

INTRODUCTION: Smokers have a high incidence of postoperative<br />

respiratory complications, and smoking can also increase the<br />

concentration of carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) up to 5%~10%, leading<br />

to cardiac events during anesthesia. Carbon monoxide (CO) can be<br />

produced from degradation of isoflurane by soda lime, especially with<br />

dry soda lime or by the use of a low-flow anesthetic technique. Some<br />

carbon dioxide (CO2) absorbents that contain few or no strong bases<br />

have become available for clinical use. We investigated the<br />

concentration of CO in the anesthetic circuit and the concentration of<br />

arterial COHb during low-flow isoflurane anesthesia in smoking and<br />

non-smoking subjects using various kinds of CO2 absorbents with and<br />

without strong bases.<br />

METHODS: Sixty ASA physical status I or II adult patients were<br />

enrolled in this study. Thirty patients who were smoking up to the<br />

operating date and 30 patients who had never smoked were selected as<br />

smoker group and non-smoker group, respectively. Anesthesia was<br />

maintained with isoflurane and nitrous oxide (1 L/min)/oxygen (1 L/<br />

min). Ventilation was controlled to maintain end-tidal partial pressure<br />

of CO2 between 34 and 38 mmHg. The end-tidal isoflurane<br />

concentrations were adjusted to 1.0%. Each group (smoker or nonsmoker<br />

group) randomly divided into three groups according to the type<br />

of CO2 absorbent used. The CO2 absorbents used were Wakolime A,<br />

Dragersorb Free, and Amsorb. Gas samples for measurement of CO<br />

(Carbolyzer, mBA-2000) were obtained from the inspiratory limb of the<br />

circle system at 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 hrs after exposure to isoflurane.<br />

Concentrations of arterial COHb were measured at the same time as the<br />

S-87<br />

8500 POET ® IQ -AN ACCURATE <strong>ANESTHESIA</strong> GAS<br />

MONITOR?<br />

AUTHORS: P. R. Lichtenthal, R. G. Loeb, S. E. Morgan;<br />

AFFILIATION: University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.<br />

INTRODUCTION: While many companies sell respiratory gas<br />

monitors, most of these are OEM; only a few companies manufacture<br />

gas monitor benches. Criticare Systems, Inc., a longtime manufacturer<br />

of gas analyzer benches, recently released a new product, the 8500<br />

Poet ® IQ. This sidestream analyzer uses non-dispersive infrared (NDIR)<br />

technology to identify and measure CO2, N2O and five halogenated<br />

anesthetics, and a fast polarographic cell to measure O2 . The object of<br />

this study was to determine the accuracy and stability of this new<br />

respiratory gas analyzer as compared to an industry-standard analyzer<br />

(Datex AS3).<br />

METHODS: For a period of four weeks we conducted daily quality<br />

checks on both gas analyzers. Each was calibrated prior to the study by<br />

a factory-authorized technician . The analyzers were used clinically<br />

during the study period; they were located in the same operating room,<br />

and were used simultaneously for every case. Both analyzers were<br />

tested every morning for their ability to correctly analyze a series of 9<br />

precision gas mixtures (Scott Medical Products), each of which<br />

contained CO2. The analyzer sample lines were connected to computercontrolled<br />

solenoid valves that simulated respiratory rates of 10, 30, 60<br />

breaths per minute by switching the inflow path between test gas and<br />

room air every 3, 1, or 0.5 second, respectively. Stable end-tidal values<br />

were recorded from each analyzer’s display. Data from both analyzers<br />

for each of the 9 gases at 3 respiratory rates were collected. The average<br />

of the daily readings during the study (mean), day-to-day variation<br />

(SD), and the average error (bias) were then calculated.<br />

RESULTS:<br />

Both analyzers had stable readings over the 4-week course of the<br />

study (day to day standard deviation

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!