Documentation Summaries - Implantium & Medical Company

Recommendations

Info

A B C D Fig 3. Crestal bone response in serveral cases after 1 year of loading. A) very favorable response. B) slight bone loss to the first microthread. C)Vertical and horizontal bony loss. D) horizontal bony loss. Table 3. Comparison of Marginal Bone Level After 1year Table 4. Marginal Bone Loss(A-B) After 1year Conclusion: The results obtained in this short-term retrospective study population revealed an excellent survival rate for <strong>Implantium</strong> implants KEY WORDS: endosseous dental implants, <strong>Implantium</strong> , retrospective analysis 13 Dental Implant
Analysis of the healing process in sinus bone grafting using various grafting materials Young-Kyun Kim, DDS, PhD, Pil-Young Yun, DDS, PhD, Su-Gwan Kim, DDS, PhD, and c Sung-Chul Lim, MD, PhD SeongNam and GwangJu City, Korea SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL AND CHOSUN UNIVERSITY Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare differences in the healing process in the sinus bone grafting using various grafting materials. Study design: Maxillary sinus bone grafts were divided into 4 groups according to the graft material used: group I, amixture of autogenous bone and BioOss (Osteohealth Co., Shirley, NY); group II, a mixture of BioOss and Orthoblast II (Greencross; Isotis); group III, BioOss only; and group IV, synthetic bone, Osteon (Genoss, Korea), only. To evaluate the healing status of the graft surgery, bone specimens were collected from the lateral sinus using a 2.0-mm trephine bur at 4 and 6 months after surgery. Histology of the bone specimens was prepared, and the percentage of newly formed bone fraction, lamellar bone/woven bone ratio (LB/WB), and newly formed bone/graft material ratio (NB/GM) were measured to indicate the suitability of the materials and the healing of the grafts. Results: The LB/WB ratio and NB/GM ratio were markedly increased at 6 months compared with the values at 4months. It was observed that good bone healing was achieved even for grafts of xenogeneic bone only or synthetic bone only. Cases grafted with a mixture of allogeneic and xenogeneic bone showed no great advantage regarding bone healing. Conclusion: The results indicated that grafts of xenogeneic or synthetic bone can be effective for sinus bone grafting. (Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;107:204-211) 4 month 6 month Bone Graft Material 14 I. Autogenous bone+BioOSS a a b Table 1. Summary of the histomorphometric study II. BioOSS +Orthoblast II III. BioOSS IV. OSTEON
Page 3 and 4: Welcome to Dentium Dentium was foun
Page 5 and 6: Documentation Summaries - Dental Im
Page 7 and 8: Comparative Analysis of Peri-Implan
Page 10 and 11: Retrospective study of survival rat
Page 12: Fig 1.Implantium Implant (Dentium C
Page 15: Retrospective Study of Implantium D
Page 19 and 20: Effects of 4 Different Alloplastic
Page 21 and 22: Alveolar Bone Regeneration by Trans
Page 27: 218. Topic Tissue Augmentation and
Page 32 and 33: Effects of Calcium-Phosphate Coatin
Page 34: Fig 4. Histologic view of the exper
Page 38 and 39: Fig 1. SEM morphologies of (A) SLA
Page 40 and 41: Fig 7. Histological view of SLA Ti
Page 42 and 43: Conclusions: The photo-induced bact
Page 44 and 45: Purpose: In this study, electron be

Documentation Summaries - Implantium & Medical Company

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?