Inter-market Arbitrage in Sports Betting - National Centre for ...
Inter-market Arbitrage in Sports Betting - National Centre for ...
Inter-market Arbitrage in Sports Betting - National Centre for ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
In the follow<strong>in</strong>g, we calculate the returns of the hedged bets as outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the<br />
previous chapter. Table 1 presents our f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />
Table 1<br />
<strong>Arbitrage</strong> opportunities <strong>in</strong> European soccer bett<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>tra‐<strong>market</strong>:<br />
return of the hedged bets<br />
The first column <strong>in</strong> Table 1 depicts the average returns of the three different<br />
hedged bets <strong>for</strong> all matches, whereas the second column illustrates the cases<br />
with an arbitrage opportunity, def<strong>in</strong>ed as hedged bets with a positive return.<br />
The upper block illustrates the average returns and the frequency of the <strong>in</strong>tra<strong>market</strong><br />
arbitrage bets, where only the odds of the eight different bookmakers<br />
are considered to <strong>for</strong>m a hedged bet. The average return of all hedged bookmaker<br />
bets is -5.1%, which is considerably higher than the average bookmaker<br />
11<br />
all arbitrage opportunities<br />
‐0.051 0.019<br />
(0.015) (0.022)<br />
observations 5,478 10<br />
percentage 0.18%<br />
long position <strong>in</strong>ter‐<strong>market</strong>:<br />
return of the hedged bets<br />
‐0.018 0.014<br />
(0.017) (0.018)<br />
observations 5,478 687<br />
percentage 12.54%<br />
short position <strong>in</strong>ter‐<strong>market</strong>:<br />
return of the hedged bets<br />
‐0.006 0.012<br />
(0.014) (0.014)<br />
observations 5,478 1,431<br />
percentage 26.12%<br />
Notes: The table gives an overview on arbitrage bets <strong>in</strong> the European soccer bett<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>market</strong>. It can be seen that the <strong>in</strong>tra‐<strong>market</strong> strategy (upper block) is less attractive<br />
than <strong>in</strong>ter‐<strong>market</strong> arbitrage <strong>in</strong> terms of number of arbitrage opportunities. The short<br />
position arbitrage method (lower block) exhibits thereby even higher potential than<br />
the long position <strong>in</strong>ter‐<strong>market</strong> method (middle block).