21.06.2013 Views

The impact of grazing on spider communities in a mesophytic ...

The impact of grazing on spider communities in a mesophytic ...

The impact of grazing on spider communities in a mesophytic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Discussi<strong>on</strong><br />

- <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>impact</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>graz<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>spider</strong> <strong>communities</strong> <strong>in</strong> a <strong>mesophytic</strong> calcareous dune grasslands - 141<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>re is a general c<strong>on</strong>sensus that <strong>spider</strong>s are good<br />

ecological <strong>in</strong>dicators (Maelfait & Baert 1988; Rusht<strong>on</strong><br />

1988; Speight 1986; Maelfait et al. 1989). A comm<strong>on</strong>ly<br />

used method for sampl<strong>in</strong>g is pitfall trapp<strong>in</strong>g. Although<br />

this methodology has widely known defects, it is a very<br />

practical way to sample ground active <strong>in</strong>vertebrates.<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce absolute pitfall catches reflect ma<strong>in</strong>ly animal activity<br />

(for <strong>in</strong>stance ground active species are more frequently<br />

caught than typical species <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the herb layer)<br />

rather than the animal density (Uetz & Unzicker 1976),<br />

a transformati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the data to relative activities (number<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> species caught per trap divided by the total caught<br />

numbers dur<strong>in</strong>g the sampl<strong>in</strong>g campaign) is necessary to<br />

make comparis<strong>on</strong>s between sampl<strong>in</strong>g stati<strong>on</strong>s, us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

species with different activity characteristics. Merrett<br />

(1983) showed that even <strong>in</strong> complex vegetati<strong>on</strong> structures,<br />

the <strong>spider</strong> community compositi<strong>on</strong> obta<strong>in</strong>ed by<br />

pitfall catches (transformed to relative abundance) was<br />

broadly similar to those obta<strong>in</strong>ed by absolute methods<br />

such as D-vacuum sucti<strong>on</strong> sampl<strong>in</strong>g. By the applicati<strong>on</strong><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the latter sampl<strong>in</strong>g technique, absolute species numbers<br />

are obta<strong>in</strong>ed which reflect the actual <strong>spider</strong> densities<br />

<strong>in</strong> the field.<br />

Although we sampled dur<strong>in</strong>g two different periods,<br />

earlier research revealed that the (dom<strong>in</strong>ant) <strong>spider</strong> community<br />

compositi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> stable envir<strong>on</strong>ments (heathlands,<br />

grassland systems, shrubs, woodlands; Baert & Desender<br />

1996; T<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>t pers. comm.) rema<strong>in</strong>s similar from year to<br />

year. On the other hand, the compositi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>spider</strong><br />

<strong>communities</strong> <strong>in</strong> highly dynamic systems (Ammophila<br />

dunes, <strong>in</strong>undated dune slacks) can undergo str<strong>on</strong>g temporal<br />

fluctuati<strong>on</strong>s, ma<strong>in</strong>ly due to changes <strong>in</strong> the density<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> typical and dom<strong>in</strong>ant opportunistic species (typical <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

highly disturbed envir<strong>on</strong>ments). <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir col<strong>on</strong>izati<strong>on</strong> is<br />

dependent <strong>on</strong> favourable weather circumstances s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

they disperse ma<strong>in</strong>ly via ‘ballo<strong>on</strong><strong>in</strong>g’ (Richter 1970;<br />

B<strong>on</strong>te et al. 1998). This ‘ballo<strong>on</strong><strong>in</strong>g’ or aer<strong>on</strong>autic behaviour<br />

is a passive aerial dispersal <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>spider</strong>s; attached<br />

<strong>on</strong> a l<strong>on</strong>g sp<strong>in</strong>neret thread they are transported with<br />

moderate air currents <strong>on</strong> warm, dry days.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> TWINSPAN- and MDS-analyses clearly reveal<br />

<strong>spider</strong> assemblages that differ between the grazed and<br />

ungrazed sites, al<strong>on</strong>g a more or less c<strong>on</strong>t<strong>in</strong>uous gradient<br />

from heavily grazed vegetati<strong>on</strong> without nearby rough<br />

vegetati<strong>on</strong>, through the transiti<strong>on</strong> z<strong>on</strong>e between the areas<br />

to the ungrazed and rough vegetati<strong>on</strong>. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> coupl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the species data to the envir<strong>on</strong>mental data set with the<br />

PRIMER s<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>tware shows the community determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

variables. Cattle <str<strong>on</strong>g>graz<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> dur<strong>in</strong>g the grow<strong>in</strong>g seas<strong>on</strong> (i.e.<br />

summer) directly <strong>in</strong>fluences the grass and herb layer,<br />

and the presence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the dwarf shrub Rosa pimp<strong>in</strong>ellifolia.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> tall grass layer and the dwarf shrub layer are both<br />

Fig. 2. Mean species richness and standard deviati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the<br />

five sample stati<strong>on</strong>s (see Table 1), after standardisati<strong>on</strong> to<br />

number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> species per 100 <strong>in</strong>dividuals.<br />

absent from the cattle-grazed area. Rabbit <str<strong>on</strong>g>graz<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> ma<strong>in</strong>ly<br />

affects the grass layer <strong>in</strong> the cattle excluded z<strong>on</strong>es. It<br />

results <strong>in</strong> patchy vegetati<strong>on</strong> with alternati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> tall<br />

grasses, Rosa pimp<strong>in</strong>ellifolia and low dune grassland<br />

similar to the cattle-grazed situati<strong>on</strong>. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> last determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

factor is ‘distance from rough vegetati<strong>on</strong>’, which is<br />

resp<strong>on</strong>sible for differences <strong>in</strong> <strong>spider</strong> <strong>communities</strong> and<br />

total catch numbers. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>se results are <strong>in</strong> agreement with<br />

the results <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> other authors who have <strong>in</strong>vestigated <strong>spider</strong><br />

<strong>communities</strong> <strong>in</strong> relati<strong>on</strong> to vegetati<strong>on</strong> structure (Rusht<strong>on</strong><br />

1988; Maelfait et al. 1990; Gibs<strong>on</strong> et al. 1992; Mc<br />

Ferran et al. 1994; Maelfait et al. 1997).<br />

Fig. 3. Activity patterns <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Lycosid <strong>spider</strong> Pardosa<br />

m<strong>on</strong>ticola <strong>in</strong> the gradient stati<strong>on</strong>s B, A1 and A2 (n = number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<strong>in</strong>dividuals per treatment).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!