21.06.2013 Views

AusPAR: Ivabradine - Therapeutic Goods Administration

AusPAR: Ivabradine - Therapeutic Goods Administration

AusPAR: Ivabradine - Therapeutic Goods Administration

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Other studies<br />

Not applicable.<br />

Electrocardiograph<br />

Pivotal studies<br />

<strong>AusPAR</strong> Coralan <strong>Ivabradine</strong> Servier Laboratories (Australia) Pty Ltd PM-2010-03269-3-3<br />

Final 31 October 2012<br />

<strong>Therapeutic</strong> <strong>Goods</strong> <strong>Administration</strong><br />

Electrocardiograms were taken to detect the lowest heart rate on treatment present in<br />

patients on the Safety Set. An on-treatment recording of HR < 40 bpm was reported in<br />

0.3% (10/3178) of patients in the ivabradine group versus 0.1% (3/ 3209) in the placebo<br />

group. An on-treatment recording of HR < 50 bpm was reported in 21.3% (676/ 3178) of<br />

patients in the ivabradine group versus 2.2% (70/ 3209) in the placebo group.<br />

Overall, the proportion of patients with asymptomatic bradycardia that led to study drug<br />

discontinuation was 0.9% and 0.2% in the ivabradine and placebo groups, respectively,<br />

and that for symptomatic bradycardia was 0.6% and 0.2%, respectively. Asymptomatic<br />

bradycardia that was considered treatment-related SAEs occurred in 0.1% and 0% in the<br />

ivabradine and placebo groups, respectively. Symptomatic bradycardia that was<br />

considered treatment-related SAEs occurred in 0.4% and < 0.1% in the ivabradine and<br />

placebo groups, respectively.<br />

Other studies<br />

Not applicable.<br />

Vital signs<br />

Pivotal studies<br />

Sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were measured at<br />

each scheduled visit during the study. There was a small increase in mean sitting SBP<br />

between baseline and last value on treatment in both treatment groups (mean change ±<br />

SD of + 4.1 ± 16.0 mmHg in the ivabradine group and +2.0 ± 16.2 mmHg in the placebo<br />

group).<br />

There was minimal change in mean sitting DBP between baseline and last value on<br />

treatment in both treatment groups (mean change ± SD of +0.4 ± 10.2 mmHg in the<br />

ivabradine group and +0.7 ± 10.3 mmHg in the placebo group).<br />

Other studies<br />

Not applicable.<br />

Postmarketing experience<br />

No postmarketing data was provided. The proposed PI contains data regarding<br />

postmarketing experience, which is unamended from the currently approved PI and states<br />

that “The following adverse reactions (frequency unknown) have been reported in<br />

postmarketing use with ivabradine; rash, erythema, pruritis, hypotension, malaise,<br />

syncope (possibly linked to bradycardia).”<br />

Other safety issues<br />

Safety in special populations<br />

In the subgroup of patients aged ≥ 75 years (N = 720, n=367 in ivabradine group, n=353 in<br />

the placebo group), the incidence of TEAEs was comparable between the ivabradine group<br />

and the placebo group (78.8%, 50.3%PY versus 77.6%, 48.0%PY, respectively) (Table 16).<br />

The most frequently reported TEAEs by SOC were Cardiac disorders (50.1%, 32.0%PY<br />

versus 47.3%, 29.2%PY, respectively), Infections and infestations (26.2%, 16.7%PY versus<br />

26.1%, 16.1%PY, respectively) and Vascular disorders (13.9%, 8.9%PY versus 14.2%,<br />

Page 44 of 101

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!