24.06.2013 Views

28. Pantokrator - Dumbarton Oaks

28. Pantokrator - Dumbarton Oaks

28. Pantokrator - Dumbarton Oaks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>28.</strong> PANTOKRATOR<br />

4. Sacramental Life<br />

The Holy Eucharist was to be made available [9] to the monks on feast days. Like the author of<br />

(22) Evergetis [15], the emperor obliges [20] his monks to offer confession to their superior, or<br />

else to the superior’s designee who should be an old and pious monk. In accordance with canon<br />

law, confessors are obliged to obtain permission “through episcopal authorization” to hear confessions.<br />

5. Cenobitic Lifestyle<br />

The emperor implicitly endorses [9], cf. [20] the provisions of (22) Evergetis [9], [22] on sharing<br />

common meals and forbidding secret eating. He also envisions [22] a communal provision of<br />

clothing to the monks. He evidently held [28] alternatives to cenobiticism, such as the kelliotic<br />

lifestyle practiced in several of the dependent institutions of the foundation, in disfavor, but did<br />

not attempt their abolition. There is no ringing endorsement of the superiority of the cenobitic<br />

lifestyle, however, as in (27) Kecharitomene [2], [51].<br />

6. Diet<br />

There were to be two meals daily on ordinary days. The emperor provides regulations for both<br />

dinner [9] and supper [11]. As in (27) Kecharitomene [45], there was a second sitting at dinner for<br />

the servers, here joined also by those who were legitimately delayed from prompt attendance by<br />

their duties. The supper seems to have been more bountiful than usual for many Byzantine monasteries:<br />

it consisted of bread, wine, seasonal fruits and vegetables, and “whatever else is suitable<br />

for eating at dinner.” Fairly detailed prescriptions are found in [12] for both fast days and ordinary<br />

days. The emperor permits the superior to make changes from “strict conformity to the canons” in<br />

the community’s diet during fasts.<br />

7. Personal Possessions<br />

There is no outright endorsement of monastic poverty, as in (27) Kecharitomene [50]. The clergy<br />

stationed at the church of the Eleousa were to receive [32] both monetary and in-kind remuneration<br />

for their services on a graduated pay scale; likewise for the servants in the philanthropic<br />

institutions. Those clergy who participated in the weekly vigil service for the forgiveness of the<br />

emperor’s sins were to receive [31] an additional cash payment, as they would [33] also on the<br />

celebration of the patronal feast of the Mother of God. If they missed the feast, however, they<br />

were to be subject to a fine payable from their personal resources. Also, the priest stationed at the<br />

foundation’s mortuary chapel was allowed [56] to keep any donations offered to him, and the<br />

kelliotic monks in most of the foundation’s dependencies [28] surely also had their private incomes.<br />

8. Care of Sick Monks<br />

The presence of a fully staffed hospital on the premises of the foundation facilitated the care of<br />

monks who fell sick. The emperor instructs [10] the superior to see to it that appropriate care was<br />

provided to an ailing monk in his cell. Alternatively, a six-bed sanatorium (triklinarion) could be<br />

made available for rest and recuperation.<br />

9. Bathing<br />

Following a gradually liberalizing attitude towards the use of baths by monks observable since<br />

[ 729 ]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!