29.06.2013 Views

Control of Aspergillus parasiticum NCIM 898 infection in ... - Ajes.in

Control of Aspergillus parasiticum NCIM 898 infection in ... - Ajes.in

Control of Aspergillus parasiticum NCIM 898 infection in ... - Ajes.in

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Key<br />

g%<br />

3<br />

2.5<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

Method<br />

Number<br />

0<br />

Asian J. Exp. Sci., Vol. 26, No. 1, 2012; 27-38<br />

Figure 1. Biosurfactant extraction us<strong>in</strong>g organic extraction process<br />

K 6 2 A<br />

K 6 2 B<br />

Bacillus subtilis. MTCC 2423<br />

Pseudomonas aerug<strong>in</strong>osa MTCC 2297<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6<br />

Method Number<br />

Reference Organic Solvents Used<br />

1. Cooper et al 1979 Chlor<strong>of</strong>orm- methanol- water (2:1:1)<br />

2. Bryant 1990 Ethyl acetate methanol Silicic acid<br />

(1:2:1)<br />

3. Morikawa 1993 & Barkay et<br />

al 1999<br />

Hexane CH3 (CH2)4CH3<br />

4. Cooper et al 1981 Dichloromethane (CH2Cl2)<br />

5. Macdonald et al 1981 Pentane (C5H12)<br />

6.<br />

Desai & Banat 1997 Chlor<strong>of</strong>orm: Methanol(2:1)<br />

[CHCl -CH OH-H O] to extract surfactant from<br />

3 3 2<br />

Corynebacterium lepus, however, very little<br />

biosurfactant was isolated by this method <strong>in</strong> our study<br />

This could be attributed to the use <strong>of</strong> water <strong>in</strong> which<br />

chlor<strong>of</strong>orm largely rema<strong>in</strong>s immisicible and the actual<br />

ratio <strong>of</strong> Chlor<strong>of</strong>orm-methanol-water used <strong>in</strong> the<br />

experiment. It is reported that the system <strong>of</strong> lipid<br />

extraction could be best designed by ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the<br />

chlor<strong>of</strong>orm, methanol and water <strong>in</strong> the comb<strong>in</strong>ed phases<br />

to 8:4:3 (by volume), otherwise selective losses <strong>of</strong> lipid<br />

may occur. In our experimental setup chlor<strong>of</strong>orm,<br />

methanol and water was ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> 10:5:7 (by<br />

volume) as described by Cooper and Goldenberg (1981)<br />

and could be one <strong>of</strong> the reasons <strong>of</strong> not yield<strong>in</strong>g<br />

surfactant for the isolate under study.<br />

Purification<br />

Though the metabolic filtrate used for the harvest<br />

32<br />

<strong>of</strong> biosurfactant was free from the bacterial cells,<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> some cellular debris and prote<strong>in</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the<br />

nutrient broth can form major impurities as they<br />

precipitate with chlor<strong>of</strong>orm -methanol along with the<br />

biosurfactant. Hence purification <strong>of</strong> the biosurfactant<br />

was undertaken with respect to the removal <strong>of</strong> prote<strong>in</strong><br />

from the biosurfactants extracted by organic solvent<br />

method by the potent isolate. Biosurfactant on reprecipitat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

yielded 37.5% prote<strong>in</strong> reduction while,<br />

purification <strong>of</strong> biosurfactant through adsorption<br />

chromatography yielded 87.5% prote<strong>in</strong> reduction<br />

without much loss <strong>of</strong> its lipid content<br />

3. Sporolytic activity <strong>of</strong> S. maltophilia biosurfactant<br />

by Phase contrast microscopy<br />

Fungal spore germ<strong>in</strong>ation marks the resumption<br />

<strong>of</strong> vegetative development lead<strong>in</strong>g to the formation <strong>of</strong> a<br />

new <strong>in</strong>dividual or colony. Germ<strong>in</strong>ation, usually follows

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!