29.06.2013 Views

lincoln eastern bypass: stage i - Archaeology Data Service

lincoln eastern bypass: stage i - Archaeology Data Service

lincoln eastern bypass: stage i - Archaeology Data Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CLAU Report No.298: Archaeological and Historical Study, Part II, Lincoln Eastern Bypass: Stage I<br />

LINCOLN EASTERN<br />

BYPASS: STAGE I<br />

ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND<br />

HISTORICAL STUDY,<br />

PART II<br />

1.0 INTRODUCTION<br />

This report has been prepared at the request of<br />

the County Archaeological Officer with the<br />

intention of bringing together all<br />

archaeological information which has become<br />

available since the completion of the<br />

assessment report - Eastern Bypass: Stage 1<br />

(CLAU Report No:29 1992).<br />

Significant advances in our understanding of<br />

the character, extent and state of preservation<br />

of the archaeological resource along the<br />

proposed <strong>bypass</strong> route have been made since<br />

1992. Relevant projects include evaluations at<br />

Greetwell by John Samuels Archaeological<br />

Consultants and Oxford Archaeotechnics in<br />

1994 and 1993 respectively, an evaluation at<br />

Bracebridge Heath in 1995-96 by<br />

Archaeological Project <strong>Service</strong>s, fieldwork in<br />

the Witham Valley area by the<br />

Washingborough Archaeological Group, and<br />

aerial photographic mapping by the Royal<br />

Commission on Historical Monuments<br />

(England). Valuable documentary research<br />

regarding the location of the medieval<br />

predecessor of Sheepwash Grange has been<br />

carried out by Dr Dennis Mills of Branston.<br />

The information in this document is presented<br />

with the proviso that further data may yet<br />

emerge. The Unit, its members and employees<br />

cannot, therefore, be held responsible for any<br />

loss, delay or damage, material or otherwise,<br />

arising out of this report. The document has<br />

been prepared in accordance with the terms of<br />

the Unit's Articles of Association, the Code of<br />

Conduct of the Institute of Field<br />

Archaeologists, and The Management of<br />

Archaeological Projects (English Heritage,<br />

1991).<br />

1<br />

2.0 RESUL TS OF FURTHER<br />

ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL<br />

RESEARCH<br />

For ease of reference the findings of this study<br />

have been grouped into four separate areas<br />

which are described in accordance with a north<br />

to south sequence (see accompanying<br />

illustrations, Figs. 1-3).<br />

2.1 Area I<br />

Evaluation of a 15 ha site at Greetwell was<br />

carried out by Oxford Archaeotechnics in<br />

December 1993 (Fig.l, Evaluation 2). The<br />

evaluation included a desktop study and a<br />

geophysical survey utilising both<br />

magnetometry and magnetic susceptibility<br />

techniques. The project succeeded in<br />

disclosing what was almost certainly a<br />

substantial and extensive late Iron Age and<br />

Romano-British settlement. The late<br />

prehistoric element probably has a relationship<br />

with the triple ditch already described in the<br />

original 1992 assessment (Hockley 1992, 5-6).<br />

Features revealed by magnetometry over the<br />

northern part of the site took the form of a<br />

complex set of rectilinear enclosures, probably<br />

of Romano-British date, including at least one<br />

substantial structure. The magnetic<br />

susceptibility survey enabled the definition of<br />

three areas of enhanced magnetism, indicative<br />

of archaeological activity, including areas to<br />

the south which had failed to produce evidence<br />

of'cut features' or of substantial structures.<br />

The magnetic susceptibility survey also located<br />

an area of burning, possibly of an industrial<br />

nature.<br />

A specification for non-intrusive evaluation<br />

has been prepared by John Samuels<br />

Archaeological Consultants for immediately<br />

adjacent fields to the north (Fig.l, Evaluation<br />

1). As part of preliminary work Air Photo<br />

services of Cambridge were commissioned to<br />

map archaeological features showing as<br />

cropmarks on aerial photographs of the area.<br />

At least one set of previously unrecognised<br />

cropmarks was identified to the east of the<br />

triple ditch feature. These can tentatively be<br />

interpreted as further rectilinear enclosures of<br />

possible Romano-British date. It seems likely<br />

that these represent a northward continuation<br />

of the previously mentioned Romano-British<br />

site.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!