Table of Contents - The Barnes Review

Waking up from the trance is a difficult and laborious
process. Certain key facts are necessary in order to achieve this,
facts which the reader, despite all the lies, can recognize and has
a possibility to verify. Here is a classic example from Darwin’s
journals.
The Patagonians (a tribal people in south Argentina) could
not see Darwin’s ship, the Beagle, conceptually or even optically,
since no large ships had hitherto been a part of their experience.
Only the shaman of the tribe could see the ship. When the
shaman began to describe the ship with the aid of shapes known
to the Patagonians, the ship became visible to all. They had a consensus
reality, which applied to small boats, but lacked a similar
conception of large ships. Many journalists lack the critical judgment
to pierce the consensus reality applying to the real course
of events during the M/V Estonia disaster—they have not even
managed to understand that the Swedish Joint Accident
Investigation Commission is obviously lying about key issues.
Many of us lack critical judgment concerning our
social, political and practical environment, since we
blindly trust the myths that Masonic circles feed us
through the mass media every day.
Most of us who prefer blindly to trust different political,
social and scientific fabrications and deny any suggestion about
hidden control behind the scenes, do not want to see that the
most important political, economic and social events in the world
are not random, but planned by non-democratic groups who hide
behind the name “Freemasons.” The inferior and degrading conditions,
which we see everywhere in different countries, did not
just happen to turn out that way. If we accept this explanation,
we immediately begin to understand everything that is happening
and all the pieces of the jigsaw fall into place. Otherwise we
will grope in darkness and understand nothing. If we refuse to
see this reality, it means that we accept living in a world without
sense, an absurd world which, without any sensible reason, has
been transformed into a surreal, Kafkaesque lunatic asylum.
The Freemasons are ever more intensive in their propagation
of unnatural ideas such as globalism (new internationalism)
or mondialism, ostensibly for the reason of promoting the
spiritual development of humanity and to build a New World
Order. This is an unparalleled deception.
Presumably the Freemasons have succeeded in their
indoctrination of society, since they are no longer regarded as a
serious threat. The Masons are in control of the mass media.
“If one controls radio, press, school, church, art, science,
film–one can transform each truth into a lie, each unreason into
reason.” 1 But the masses have always believed in those gods
that propagate themselves most dramatically.
The power to control the news flow is the same thing as
the power to control how people think. We boast about free
press in the United States. But how free is it really, when
we receive the same news from all the big media conglomerates
and when alternative opinions never reach the
majority of Americans? The power to report and describe
reality is now in the hands of a few. And the interest of
these few powerful people is in opposition to the interest of
the people, the general interest. It makes no difference that
these media conglomerates have different names and
appearances, since they all share the same values, which is
a guarantee that we receive cloned information. 2
22 N O V E M B E R / D E C E M B E R 2 0 0 3
I believe the few who control the flow of information belong
to international Freemasonry.
Noam Chomsky wrote: “Propaganda works more effectively
if one manages to maintain the illusion that the mass
media is a non-partial observer. Tough debates within invisible
boundaries will actually have the effect of strengthening the
system.”
It is not possible to control Masonic lodges or other elite
structures. At the same time, we know that a group, which cannot
be controlled, immediately begins to manipulate the press
and believes that it stands above the law. The Freemasons use
myths as the base of their power in their war against us.
Myths as a base of power
For centuries the whole of Europe believed in witches.
Huge books written by learned men, such as the infamous
Malleus maleficarum (The Witch Hammer) by Heinrich Institoris
and Jakob Sprenger, published in 1486 and printed in a
further 30 editions until 1669, stigmatized the nefarious practices
of witches.
Would not everyone still believe in witches today, if they
had been brought up with horror stories about witches from
their earliest childhood and if the mass media related their
heinous crimes day after day?
More and more myths have begun to erode recently. They
do not stand up to close scrutiny.
In 490 B.C., the Athenians won an honorable victory over
the invading Persians at Marathon. The Athenians sent the
runner Pheidippides 41 kilometers back to Athens to report the
victory. He ran into the square and managed to shout: “We are
victorious!” before he fell dead. This story was believed to be
true. But it was not. Pheidippides never ran from Marathon to
Athens. It is a myth. The source of this myth was the Greek historian
Herodotus.
On September 9, 490 B.C., Pheidippides actually ran 250
kilometers from Athens to Sparta to ask the Spartans for assistance.
The Spartans did not wish to lend their aid before the full
moon had risen, so Pheidippides began to run back again and
reported this. On September 12, the Athenians defeated the
Persians without the help of the Spartans. This myth was
uncovered in 1982.
Not long ago, the Swiss believed that the storming of
the Habsburg castles occurred after the taking of
oaths in Ruetli in 1291. Excavations have shown that
the castles were abandoned without a struggle long
before 1291. The storming of the castles never happened. 3
The English astronomer Sir Fred Hoyle has reached the
conclusion that the universe is governed by a greater intelligence.
In 1978, Hoyle described the conspirator Charles
Darwin’s theory of evolution as wrong and claimed that the
belief that the first living cell was created in the “sea of life” was
just as erroneous. In his book Evolution from Space (1982), he
distanced himself completely from Darwinism. He stated that
“natural selection” could not explain evolution.
Hoyle asked in his book The Intelligent Universe (1983):
“Life as we know it is, among other things, dependent on at
least 2,000 different enzymes. How could the blind forces of the
primal sea manage to put together the correct chemical elements
to build enzymes?” The statistics are revealing: