Inside - ColdType
Inside - ColdType
Inside - ColdType
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
THE ISRAEL LOBBY<br />
Now, the<br />
neoconservativ<br />
e agenda<br />
for the Middle<br />
East maintains<br />
the U.S.<br />
embrace<br />
of Israel with<br />
great<br />
enthusiasm.<br />
And defenders<br />
of that agenda<br />
often resort<br />
to timeworn<br />
tactics for<br />
squelching<br />
debate<br />
20 TheREADER<br />
Overall, in the American news<br />
media, the horrible killings of Israelis<br />
by Palestinian suicide bombers get<br />
front-page and prime-time coverage<br />
while the horrible killings of Palestinians<br />
by Israelis get relatively scant and<br />
dispassionate coverage.<br />
If the U.S. news media were to<br />
become committed to a single standard<br />
of human rights, the shift would<br />
transform public discourse about<br />
basic Israeli policies – and jeopardize<br />
the U.S. government’s support for<br />
them. It is against just such a single<br />
standard that the epithet of “anti-<br />
Semitism” is commonly wielded.<br />
From the viewpoint of Israel and its<br />
supporters, the ongoing threat of<br />
using the label helps to prevent U.S.<br />
media coverage from getting out of<br />
hand. Journalists understand critical<br />
words about Israel to be hazardous to<br />
their careers.<br />
In the real world, bigotry toward<br />
Jews and support for Israel have long<br />
been independent variables. For instance,<br />
as Oval Office tapes attest,<br />
President Richard M. Nixon was anti-<br />
Semitic and did not restrain himself<br />
from expressing that virulent prejudice<br />
in private. Yet he was a big<br />
admirer of the Israeli military and a<br />
consistent backer of Israel’s government.<br />
Now, the neoconservative agenda<br />
for the Middle East maintains the<br />
U.S. embrace of Israel with great<br />
enthusiasm. And defenders of that<br />
agenda often resort to timeworn tactics<br />
for squelching debate.<br />
Last fall, when I met with editors at<br />
a newspaper in the Pacific Northwest,<br />
a member of the editorial board<br />
responded to my reference to neocons<br />
by declaring flatly that “neocon” is an<br />
“anti-Semitic” term. The absurd claim<br />
would probably amuse the most<br />
powerful neocons in the U.S. government’s<br />
executive branch today, Vice<br />
President Dick Cheney and Defense<br />
Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, neither<br />
of whom is Jewish.<br />
Over the past couple of decades, a<br />
growing number of American Jews<br />
have seen their way clear to oppose<br />
Israeli actions.<br />
Yet their voices continue to be<br />
nearly drowned out in major U.S.<br />
media outlets by Israel-right-orwrong<br />
outfits such as the American<br />
Israel Public Affairs Committee, the<br />
Anti-Defamation League and the<br />
American Jewish Committee.<br />
As with all forms of bigotry, anti-<br />
Semitism should be condemned. At<br />
the same time, these days, America’s<br />
biggest anti-Semitism problem has to<br />
do with the misuse of the label as a<br />
manipulative tactic to short-circuit<br />
debate about Washington’s alliance<br />
with Israel. CT<br />
Norman Solomon is executive director<br />
of the Institute for Public Accuracy<br />
and the author of War Made Easy:<br />
How Presidents and Pundits Keep<br />
Spinning Us to Death.<br />
(www.warmadeasy.com)<br />
E-mail Solomon at:<br />
mediabeat@igc.org.<br />
This essay originally appeared<br />
in the Baltimore Sun.