14.07.2013 Views

* and 1* - Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur - TU Delft

* and 1* - Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur - TU Delft

* and 1* - Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur - TU Delft

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

History<br />

Some proofs<br />

Working toward 0 = 1<br />

A non-trivial autohomeomorphism<br />

Two results<br />

Theorem (Frankiewicz 1977)<br />

The minimum cardinal κ (if any) such that κ ∗ is homeomorphic<br />

to λ ∗ for some λ > κ must be ω.<br />

Theorem (Balcar <strong>and</strong> Frankiewicz 1978)<br />

ω ∗ 1 <strong>and</strong> ω∗ 2<br />

are not homeomorphic.<br />

History<br />

Some proofs<br />

Working toward 0 = 1<br />

A non-trivial autohomeomorphism<br />

Assume there are κ <strong>and</strong> λ . . .<br />

K. P. Hart ω ∗ <strong>and</strong> ω ∗ 1 8 / 30<br />

Let κ be minimal such that there is λ > κ for which κ ∗ <strong>and</strong> λ ∗ are<br />

homeomorphic.<br />

Propo<strong>sit</strong>ion<br />

If κ < µ < λ then κ ∗ <strong>and</strong> µ ∗ are homeomorphic.<br />

Proof.<br />

Let h : λ ∗ → κ ∗ be a homeomorphism <strong>and</strong> take A ⊆ κ such that<br />

A ∗ = h[µ ∗ ].<br />

Note: |A| < µ, so by minimality of κ we must have |A| = κ.<br />

K. P. Hart ω ∗ <strong>and</strong> ω ∗ 1 10 / 30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!