19.07.2013 Views

Facebook Discovery and the Unbearable Sameness of Internet Law

Facebook Discovery and the Unbearable Sameness of Internet Law

Facebook Discovery and the Unbearable Sameness of Internet Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

50 ARKANSAS LAW REVIEW [Vol. 65:39<br />

<strong>the</strong> ability to download all updates ever made to <strong>the</strong>ir “wall,” as<br />

long as <strong>the</strong>y are current subscribers. 39<br />

Given <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ECPA on discovery from nonparty<br />

ISPs, one might suspect an equally pr<strong>of</strong>ound transformation has<br />

taken place with respect to requests from parties <strong>the</strong>mselves.<br />

That is, given how widely social-networking posts are typically<br />

shared, <strong>and</strong> how easy <strong>the</strong>y are to access <strong>and</strong> copy, one might<br />

conclude that perhaps <strong>the</strong> rules are, or at least should be,<br />

different for social-networking posts than for o<strong>the</strong>r sorts <strong>of</strong><br />

documents. In fact, several courts have presumed exactly that,<br />

ordering parties not merely to produce relevant documents<br />

responsive to a request, but to affirmatively grant unlimited<br />

access to <strong>the</strong>ir accounts to an opposing party. In some cases,<br />

parties have been ordered to turn over <strong>the</strong>ir passwords <strong>and</strong> login<br />

information, so that opposing counsel can log in as <strong>the</strong> account<br />

holder <strong>and</strong> see everything that he or she sees, including not only<br />

<strong>the</strong> account holder’s posts, but <strong>the</strong> posts <strong>of</strong> all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> account<br />

holder’s friends. 40 And although only a dozen such decisions<br />

have come to light, primarily from state trial courts, it is likely<br />

that <strong>the</strong>se decisions are just <strong>the</strong> tip <strong>of</strong> an unseen iceberg <strong>of</strong><br />

unreported cases, as state trial-court opinions are typically not<br />

captured in online databases <strong>and</strong> are <strong>of</strong>ten simply made on <strong>the</strong><br />

record. Many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> decisions that have come to light so far<br />

have come from two states, New York <strong>and</strong> Pennsylvania, which<br />

may simply be an artifact <strong>of</strong> better journalistic coverage <strong>of</strong> legal<br />

developments in those jurisdictions. 41<br />

Whatever may be said about <strong>the</strong> prevalence <strong>of</strong> decisions<br />

granting litigants access to <strong>the</strong>ir opponents’ social-networking<br />

39. See Kelly Ann Bub, Comment, Privacy’s Role in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Discovery</strong> <strong>of</strong> Social<br />

Networking Site Information, 64 SMU L. REV. 1433, 1460 (2011); Download Your<br />

Information, FACEBOOK (visited Feb. 6, 2012), http:// www.facebook.com/help/?page=<br />

116481065103985. According to <strong>Facebook</strong>, <strong>the</strong> following is included in a download:<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>and</strong> timeline information, wall <strong>and</strong> timeline posts by <strong>the</strong> user <strong>and</strong> his or her friends,<br />

uploaded photos <strong>and</strong> videos, friend lists, notes, events that users have RSVP’d, sent <strong>and</strong><br />

received messages, <strong>and</strong> comments that a user or his or her friends have posted to <strong>the</strong> user’s<br />

wall, photos, <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r pr<strong>of</strong>ile content. Id. Comments that <strong>the</strong> user has made on friends’<br />

posts, as well as friends’ posts merely visible to <strong>the</strong> user, are apparently not included.<br />

40. See, e.g., Romano v. Steelcase, Inc., 907 N.Y.S.2d 650 (Sup. Ct. 2010);<br />

McMillen v. Hummingbird Speedway, Inc., No. 113-2010 CD, 2010 WL 4403285 (Pa. Ct.<br />

C.P. Sept. 9, 2010).<br />

41. Both New York City <strong>and</strong> Philadelphia have daily legal newspapers, <strong>the</strong> New<br />

York <strong>Law</strong> Journal <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Legal Intelligencer, respectively. I have heard anecdotal reports<br />

<strong>of</strong> similar orders being issued in Wisconsin.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!