19.07.2013 Views

Bulletin of the Massachusetts Archaeological Society, Vol. 25, No. 3 ...

Bulletin of the Massachusetts Archaeological Society, Vol. 25, No. 3 ...

Bulletin of the Massachusetts Archaeological Society, Vol. 25, No. 3 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE ADVANCE OF NEW ENGLAND ARCHAEOLOGY 65<br />

recesses, within, <strong>the</strong> thought that family groups<br />

must have attended quarry operations becomes a<br />

conviction. If only men were present, it seems<br />

unlikely - under a primitive way <strong>of</strong> life - that<br />

<strong>the</strong>y would have gone to <strong>the</strong> trouble <strong>of</strong> making<br />

stone hearths and building such a well-constructed<br />

living abode. At least this premise seems to fit <strong>the</strong><br />

postulation that follows concerning participation <strong>of</strong><br />

women in <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> quarrying.<br />

Until this excavation and subsequent ones had<br />

been made, <strong>the</strong> universal belief was that men alone<br />

went to <strong>the</strong> quarries. They were presumed to have<br />

performed all <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> cutting out and making<br />

<strong>the</strong> stone products <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir labor. If this were so,<br />

<strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong>y must have been obliged to load <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

stone products into baskets and tote <strong>the</strong>m all <strong>the</strong><br />

way back to <strong>the</strong>ir home sites, whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y liked<br />

it or not. Without a division <strong>of</strong> labor to ease <strong>the</strong><br />

work, such concentration <strong>of</strong> effort placed in <strong>the</strong><br />

hands <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> men would seem almost too much to<br />

have been expected. Then with <strong>the</strong> finding <strong>of</strong><br />

tailing-removal tools, usually made <strong>of</strong> impure granite<br />

unsuitable for working steatite, attention was<br />

attracted to <strong>the</strong> possible connection between <strong>the</strong>m<br />

and agricultural tools <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> age that followed. In<br />

this comparison, <strong>the</strong> close similarity that exists between<br />

<strong>the</strong> planter's Triangular hoe on <strong>the</strong> one hand<br />

and <strong>the</strong> quarry Triangular tailing-breaker on <strong>the</strong><br />

o<strong>the</strong>r, and in like manner between <strong>the</strong> Cornplanter<br />

and <strong>the</strong> quarry Spiked tailing-breaker is<br />

striking. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, a connection seems to exist between<br />

<strong>the</strong> planter's Stem spade and quarry Hand<br />

spade. When all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se factors are taken into<br />

consideration, a postulation that <strong>the</strong> planter's tools<br />

were modifications emerging from <strong>the</strong>ir quarry<br />

counterparts is inescapable.<br />

Assuming now that this inspired tool development<br />

took place, what was <strong>the</strong> force behind it that<br />

apparently made it inevitable? To answer this<br />

question, it should be remembered that stone bowl<br />

quarrying had been going on for a very long time,<br />

probably for more than a thousand years under<br />

male domination. And at <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> advent <strong>of</strong><br />

maize planting, which may have followed close<br />

on <strong>the</strong> closing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> quarries, an industrial tradition<br />

involving tools and work techniques had<br />

become an impelling force <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> day. Still ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />

important factor is <strong>the</strong> strong probability that<br />

women became <strong>the</strong> planters, or <strong>the</strong>y would not have<br />

had <strong>the</strong> skill and knowledge that made <strong>the</strong>m <strong>the</strong><br />

cultivators <strong>of</strong> maize in colonial times. Therefore,<br />

seemingly what happened was that <strong>the</strong> prevailing<br />

quarry tradition had become so much a part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

lives that in developing new agricultural tools,<br />

women felt impelled to copy old tool types.<br />

From this <strong>the</strong> postulation follows that because<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> probable relation between <strong>the</strong> two different<br />

sets <strong>of</strong> tools, correspondingly, <strong>the</strong> users <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m<br />

would have been women. That is to say, traditional<br />

ideas tend to be perpetuated within <strong>the</strong> sex to<br />

which <strong>the</strong>y belong. Therefore, allowing that women<br />

were <strong>the</strong> planters from <strong>the</strong> beginning, <strong>the</strong> inevitable<br />

conclusion seems to be that women were quarry<br />

laborers, whose job was to remove quarry tailings,<br />

or waste from <strong>the</strong> workings, and transport <strong>the</strong> stone<br />

products <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> quarry in baskets to <strong>the</strong>ir home<br />

camps.<br />

When consideration is given to <strong>the</strong> probability<br />

that stone bowl quarrying continued for more than<br />

a thousand years under male supervision, it becomes<br />

important to try to envision what may have<br />

taken place when <strong>the</strong> quarries closed down, and <strong>the</strong><br />

making <strong>of</strong> stone bowls ceased. In order to evaluate<br />

<strong>the</strong> evolving state <strong>of</strong> affairs, it is necessary to consider<br />

<strong>the</strong> manufactured article that replaced stone<br />

bowls as <strong>the</strong> family cooking pot. This was <strong>the</strong><br />

ceramic clay pot, which from <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> its<br />

inception became <strong>the</strong> means <strong>of</strong> providing a lighter<br />

weight and more easily produced cooking vessel<br />

for liquid foods. <strong>No</strong>w, since women were <strong>the</strong><br />

potters in colonial days, <strong>the</strong>y must have been from<br />

<strong>the</strong> start in order to have acquired <strong>the</strong> skill required<br />

in making <strong>the</strong> more elaborate pots <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

final Stage 4 development. With this probability<br />

in mind, it seems logical to conclude that an<br />

industrial revolution took place with <strong>the</strong> introduction<br />

<strong>of</strong> ceramics; <strong>the</strong> industrial talents <strong>of</strong> women<br />

replaced those <strong>of</strong> men. Women became makers <strong>of</strong><br />

ceramic cooking pots and no longer wanted <strong>the</strong><br />

former heavy stone bowls. The demand for <strong>the</strong>m<br />

came to an end, which forced <strong>the</strong> quarries to close.<br />

Men were <strong>the</strong> losers with <strong>the</strong>ir skilled labor in<br />

industry no longer required; industrial power had<br />

passed into <strong>the</strong> hands <strong>of</strong> women.<br />

CERAMIC DISCOVERIES<br />

During <strong>the</strong> first site excavations, little was<br />

known about what went on here in New England<br />

during <strong>the</strong> Ceramic Age. Reliance was placed<br />

quite generally upon evidence presented by C. C.<br />

Willoughby in, Antiquities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> New England<br />

Indians. Attention was called to certain restored<br />

pots having pointed bases and simple design markings<br />

as being old, since <strong>the</strong>y were recovered from<br />

<strong>the</strong> lower part <strong>of</strong> Maine shellheaps. With only a<br />

small amount <strong>of</strong> evidence from o<strong>the</strong>r parts <strong>of</strong> New<br />

England to work with, attention was focused on<br />

research in New York State, as reported by W. A.<br />

Ritchie in, Pre-Iroquoian Occupations <strong>of</strong> New York<br />

State. In this book, Vinette 1 pottery was described

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!