20.07.2013 Views

"Pride and Prejudice in Pride and Prejudice" by Everett Zimmerman

"Pride and Prejudice in Pride and Prejudice" by Everett Zimmerman

"Pride and Prejudice in Pride and Prejudice" by Everett Zimmerman

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

66 N<strong>in</strong>eteenth-Century Fiction<br />

rema<strong>in</strong> aloof: with or without <strong>in</strong>tention they are drawn <strong>in</strong>to the<br />

the affairs of others. Failure to recognize this <strong>in</strong>volvement is a<br />

form of moral <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>tellectual obtuseness, <strong>and</strong> a constant resist-<br />

ance to this <strong>in</strong>volvement results <strong>in</strong> a renunciation of responsibility<br />

or happ<strong>in</strong>ess. <strong>Prejudice</strong> is the opposite of pride: the self is com-<br />

pletely <strong>in</strong>volved with others, <strong>and</strong> everyth<strong>in</strong>g is <strong>in</strong>terpreted as it<br />

affects the self. Although the <strong>in</strong>evitable <strong>in</strong>volvement between<br />

others <strong>and</strong> the self is acknowledged, judgment is entirely dis-<br />

torted. Both qualities, pride <strong>and</strong> prejudice, result <strong>in</strong> a severe<br />

limitation of human vision <strong>and</strong> are essentially selfish <strong>in</strong> that they<br />

start from an egoistic attitude; one either severs oneself from<br />

others or limits one's concern for them to narrow self-<strong>in</strong>terest.<br />

<strong>Pride</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Prejudice</strong> opens with a conversation between Mr.<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mrs. Bennet, two characters who consistently emphasize the<br />

salient qualities of the fail<strong>in</strong>gs implied <strong>by</strong> the title; Mr. Bennet<br />

exhibits the detachment of pride <strong>and</strong> Mrs. Bennet the total <strong>in</strong>-<br />

volvement of prejudice. Mr. Bennet's characteristic speech is<br />

ironic, <strong>and</strong> the pervasiveness of the irony reflects his refusal to<br />

commit himself to any action. His credo, as he formulates it, is,<br />

"For what do we live, but to make sport for our neighbors, <strong>and</strong><br />

laugh at them <strong>in</strong> our turn." Mrs. Bennet's speech, <strong>in</strong> contrast<br />

to Mr. Bennet's, is totally devoid of irony <strong>and</strong> humor. She is en-<br />

tirely committed to gett<strong>in</strong>g her daughter; married <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>terprets<br />

everyth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the light of that over-rid<strong>in</strong>g concern, not be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

"backward to credit what was for the advantage of her family. . ."<br />

(378).<br />

These two characters <strong>in</strong> their brilliant open<strong>in</strong>g scene establish<br />

themselves as moral poles around which many of the m<strong>in</strong>or char-<br />

acters cluster. Mr. Coll<strong>in</strong>s <strong>and</strong> Mary Bennet .provide amusement<br />

for Mr. Bennet, but <strong>in</strong> their unsympathiz<strong>in</strong>g detachment from<br />

others' feel<strong>in</strong>gs they resemble him. Lydia, as Marv<strong>in</strong> Mudrick<br />

notes, is a younger Mrs. Bennet,? <strong>and</strong> Jane Bennet allows her<br />

judgment to be distorted <strong>by</strong> her <strong>in</strong>volvements <strong>and</strong> desires, just as<br />

Lydia <strong>and</strong> Mrs. Bennet do. F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g it pa<strong>in</strong>ful to see evil <strong>in</strong> the<br />

world, Jane simply refuses to see it. And Lady Cather<strong>in</strong>e treats<br />

human be<strong>in</strong>gs merely as projections of her own desires. All of<br />

e<strong>Pride</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Prejudice</strong>, ed. R. W. Chapman, 3rd ed. (New York, 1932), p. 364. All<br />

subsequent references are to this edition.<br />

Jane Austen: Irony as Defense <strong>and</strong> Discovery (Pr<strong>in</strong>ceton, 1952), p. 99.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!