20.07.2013 Views

math 216: foundations of algebraic geometry - Stanford University

math 216: foundations of algebraic geometry - Stanford University

math 216: foundations of algebraic geometry - Stanford University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

16 Math <strong>216</strong>: Foundations <strong>of</strong> Algebraic Geometry<br />

ν ′ : P ′ → N, these maps must factor uniquely through P:<br />

(2.1.0.1) P ′<br />

∃! ν<br />

<br />

′<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

µ ′<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

P<br />

ν<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

N<br />

µ<br />

<br />

M<br />

(The symbol ∃ means “there exists”, and the symbol ! here means “unique”.) Thus<br />

a product is a diagram<br />

ν<br />

P <br />

N<br />

µ<br />

<br />

M<br />

and not just a set P, although the maps µ and ν are <strong>of</strong>ten left implicit.<br />

This definition agrees with the traditional definition, with one twist: there<br />

isn’t just a single product; but any two products come with a unique isomorphism<br />

between them. In other words, the product is unique up to unique isomorphism.<br />

Here is why: if you have a product<br />

and I have a product<br />

µ1<br />

µ2<br />

P1<br />

<br />

M<br />

P2<br />

<br />

ν1 <br />

ν2 <br />

M<br />

then by the universal property <strong>of</strong> my product (letting (P2, µ2, ν2) play the role <strong>of</strong><br />

(P, µ, ν), and (P1, µ1, ν1) play the role <strong>of</strong> (P ′ , µ ′ , ν ′ ) in (2.1.0.1)), there is a unique<br />

map f : P1 → P2 making the appropriate diagram commute (i.e. µ1 = µ2 ◦ f and<br />

ν1 = ν2 ◦ f). Similarly by the universal property <strong>of</strong> your product, there is a unique<br />

map g : P2 → P1 making the appropriate diagram commute. Now consider the<br />

universal property <strong>of</strong> my product, this time letting (P2, µ2, ν2) play the role <strong>of</strong> both<br />

(P, µ, ν) and (P ′ , µ ′ , ν ′ ) in (2.1.0.1). There is a unique map h : P2 → P2 such that<br />

P2<br />

N<br />

N<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

h<br />

ν2<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

µ2 P2 <br />

N<br />

ν2<br />

<br />

<br />

µ2<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

M<br />

commutes. However, I can name two such maps: the identity map idP2 , and g ◦ f.<br />

Thus g ◦ f = idP1 . Similarly, f ◦ g = idP2 . Thus the maps f and g arising from

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!