21.07.2013 Views

A New Clandestine Service: The Case for ... - Hoover Institution

A New Clandestine Service: The Case for ... - Hoover Institution

A New Clandestine Service: The Case for ... - Hoover Institution

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Hoover</strong> Press : Berkowitz/Intelligence hberai ch4 Mp_115_rev1_page 115<br />

A <strong>New</strong> <strong>Clandestine</strong> <strong>Service</strong><br />

115<br />

CIA has generally viewed consular cover as a backwater—the work<br />

is demanding, and few case officers want to exert such ef<strong>for</strong>t on<br />

behalf of the State Department when the odds of a recruitment are<br />

so small. <strong>Case</strong> officers, whatever their target, usually prefer the<br />

more prestigious, though usually even less useful, State Department<br />

political cover to “camouflage” their activities.<br />

<strong>The</strong> problems of time-on-target and association plagued agency<br />

officers in the Cold War on most difficult but conventionally accessible<br />

targets. It is imperative <strong>for</strong> outsiders to understand the depth<br />

and surreality of these long-standing problems to appreciate how<br />

defective and self-delusional the <strong>Clandestine</strong> <strong>Service</strong> has been since<br />

espionage replaced covert action as the mainstay of its ethos in the<br />

1950s. If you understand the mind-set and the routine methods<br />

during the Cold War, you will understand why Langley has so far<br />

successfully resisted pro-re<strong>for</strong>m outside pressure and soul-scorching<br />

internal reflection since 9/11. Five decades of mostly bad habits,<br />

seen inside as the approved playbook <strong>for</strong> routine espionage operations,<br />

has made the <strong>Clandestine</strong> <strong>Service</strong> nearly impervious to criticism<br />

and internally driven re<strong>for</strong>mation. Know the truth behind<br />

routine Cold War era operations—that they most often made no<br />

sense whatsoever—and you will also understand why only massive<br />

re<strong>for</strong>m has any chance of changing the debilitating practices of the<br />

agency’s Directorate of Operations. If, however, you think that the<br />

DO did a decent job during the Cold War—and this is the preferred<br />

historical starting point <strong>for</strong> the CIA, which most establishment liberals<br />

and conservatives assent to with little hesitation—then it’s<br />

possible to believe that the agency can adjust to a post-9/11 world<br />

without that much internal bloodletting and trauma. <strong>Case</strong> officers<br />

are, after all, Americans, so this theory goes, and they thus will<br />

honestly cross-examine themselves <strong>for</strong> the good of the country. But<br />

see the past accurately, and you will understand that Americans,<br />

like everybody else, can, in closed societies, continuously and effec-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!