21.07.2013 Views

Plotinus: Enneads - AwardSpace

Plotinus: Enneads - AwardSpace

Plotinus: Enneads - AwardSpace

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Ennead I<br />

First tractate: The animate and the man<br />

Written by <strong>Plotinus</strong>, 253­270 A.D.<br />

1. Pleasure and distress, fear and courage, desire and aversion,<br />

where have these affections and experiences their seat?<br />

Clearly, either in the Soul alone, or in the Soul as employing<br />

the body, or in some third entity deriving from both. And for<br />

this third entity, again, there are two possible modes: it might<br />

be either a blend or a distinct form due to the blending.<br />

And what applies to the affections applies also to whatsoever<br />

acts, physical or mental, spring from them.<br />

We have, therefore, to examine discursive­reason and the<br />

ordinary mental action upon objects of sense, and enquire<br />

whether these have the one seat with the affections and<br />

experiences, or perhaps sometimes the one seat, sometimes<br />

another.<br />

And we must consider also our acts of Intellection, their mode<br />

and their seat.<br />

And this very examining principle, which investigates and<br />

decides in these matters, must be brought to light.<br />

Firstly, what is the seat of Sense­Perception? This is the<br />

obvious beginning since the affections and experiences either<br />

are sensations of some kind or at least never occur apart from<br />

sensation.<br />

2. This first enquiry obliges us to consider at the outset the<br />

nature of the Soul­ that is whether a distinction is to be made<br />

between Soul and Essential Soul [between an individual Soul<br />

and the Soul­Kind in itself]. *<br />

* All matter shown in brackets is added by the translator for<br />

clearness' sake and, therefore, is not canonical. S.M.<br />

If such a distinction holds, then the Soul [in man] is some sort<br />

of a composite and at once we may agree that it is a recipient<br />

and­ if only reason allows­ that all the affections and<br />

experiences really have their seat in the Soul, and with the<br />

affections every state and mood, good and bad alike.<br />

But if Soul [in man] and Essential Soul are one and the same,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!