UNSW goes to Athens - UNSW Newsroom - University of New South ...

I
was President of Academic Board from 2 August 1999 to 31 July 2004
and Pro-Chancellor from 23 February to 31 July 2004. I am grateful to
have worked with many members of Academic Board and Council as
well as with many other staff and students. I was fortunate to work with
two Chancellors (Sir Anthony Mason, John Yu) and three Vice-Chancellors
(John Niland, Rory Hume, Mark Wainwright), as well as with three Deputy
Chancellors, two Pro-Chancellors, six Deputy Vice-Chancellors, seven Pro-
Vice-Chancellors, one Registrar, 28 Deans (give or take) and fi ve Deputy
Presidents of the Board.
Academic Board (like UNSW) has covered much
ground in the last fi ve years, and has sometimes
covered the same ground many times. In full swing,
Academic Board is a wonderful experience and many
discussions (including those on the Faculty of Science
and on the establishment of UNSW Asia in Singapore)
have seen the representative, collective intellect at its
best. Academic Board discussions can be diffi cult for those who have a low
tolerance of disagreement or a high desire
for control and command.
The capacity to look confi dent when
you have no idea what is happening
is an essential skill for the President
of Academic Board. Throughout
my stewardship, I hope Academic
Board was central in providing advice
to Council and the Vice-Chancellor,
proactive and effective in contributing
to University direction and policy,
and independent and balanced in
its deliberations.
Academic Board must continue to contribute
with the autonomy that is essential to
the academic and social enterprise of
UNSW. The exercise of this autonomy can
lastword
Five years minus one
By Kevin McConkey
day
16 August 2004 UNIKEN
Academic Board must
continue to contribute with
the autonomy that is essential
to the academic and social
enterprise of UNSW
cause discomfort to some; one quickly learns that the independence of the
President is sometimes its own reward. Of course, along with autonomy and
independence, there is the privilege of showing responsibility to the University
as a whole. This involves fi nding the right balance of academic freedom and
duty in what one does, and of working to meet our own needs, the needs of
the University and the needs of society.
The renewal and redirection of our University must progress with focused
desire and formed action. As I wrote in the Report of the Ways and Means Task
Force in July 2000: “as a University we need to be creative
and enterprising; we need to come together with trust on the
changes we must go through; and, we need to do so now.”
This is not easy to put into practice and there have been
times when our University seems to have been as much
in darkness as in daylight. I was always conscious of how
diffi cult that has been for many.
It is now time to fl y at the edge of dawn. It is there that
we will fi nd the excitement of leadership, the freshness of discovery, and
the satisfaction of lasting impression. To fi nd that place we need to get
right the balance of individual initiative and creativity and of institutional
accountability and loyalty; these dimensions do not need to be in confl ict.
We will get the balance right through clear principles, transparent processes,
tolerance for ambiguity, commitment to collegiality and a capacity to look
beyond the immediate.
In the close and in the distant future there will be issues of great challenge.
I am hopeful that the wise resolution of these will come from Council,
Academic Board, and senior management working together with goodwill
to ensure the right mix of consultation, consensus building, and decisionmaking
across students, staff and the wider community.
Since its creation in 1988 Academic Board has had fi ve Presidents (Derek
Anderson, Jane Morrison, Jeremy Davis, Robert King, Kevin McConkey),
each of which has brought a distinctive style and infl uence to this position
of delicate power. I wish my successor, Tony Dooley, well. I thank friends
and colleagues for their support. I will not forget the privilege of serving this
University as President of Academic Board for fi ve years minus one day. ■