Expert Witness Report - National Center for Science Education
Expert Witness Report - National Center for Science Education
Expert Witness Report - National Center for Science Education
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Institute <strong>for</strong> Creation Research (YEC) (1980): “Today there are thousands of scientists<br />
who are creationists and who repudiate any <strong>for</strong>m of evolution in their analysis and use of<br />
scientific data. Creationist scientists can now be found in literally every discipline of<br />
science and their numbers are increasing rapidly.” 72<br />
Kenyon affidavit (1986): “Although students generally hear only one side on the origins<br />
question, increasing numbers of scientists are now abandoning evolution <strong>for</strong> a new<br />
scientific version of creationism. Creationist scientists now number in the hundreds,<br />
possibly in the thousands, in the States and other countries.” 73<br />
Discovery Institute’s <strong>Center</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Science</strong> and Culture, “Top Questions [on ID]”<br />
(2004): “Since Discovery Institute first published its statement of dissent <strong>for</strong>m Darwin in<br />
2001, more than 300 scientists have courageously stepped <strong>for</strong>ward and signed onto a<br />
growing list of scientists of all disciplines voicing their skepticism over the central tenets<br />
of Darwin’s theory of evolution.” 74<br />
Of Pandas and People (1993): “ Pandas gives students a much-needed opportunity to<br />
explore the evidence and arguments that have caused some scientists to doubt<br />
contemporary Darwinism. . . . Pandas helps students understand the case <strong>for</strong> intelligent<br />
design. Following a growing number of scientists and philosophers, the authors argue<br />
that life not only appears to have been intelligently designed but that it actually was.” 75<br />
2. Creationists reject natural explanations of such things as the origin of life.<br />
Henry Morris, ed., Scientific Creationism (1974) (YEC): “Creationists believe that this<br />
continued emphasis on the naturalistic or artificial production of living organisms is<br />
highly misleading. None of these phenomena would ever occur under natural<br />
conditions. . . . There is no [sic] slightest scientific evidence that life can come from nonlife.<br />
The creation model emphasizes the unique origin of life, at the creative word of a<br />
living Creator.” 76<br />
Kenyon affidavit (1986): “Until such evidence [that life on earth could have begun<br />
spontaneously by purely chemical and physical means] is <strong>for</strong>thcoming, one certainly<br />
72 See “The ICR Scientists,” Impact (August 1980), Institute <strong>for</strong> Creation Research, at<br />
www.icr.org/pubs/imp/imp-086.htm. Accessed on March 14 2005.<br />
73 See Kenyon, “Affidavit,” 61-62.<br />
74 See <strong>Center</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Science</strong> and Culture, “Top Questions,” at www.discovery.org/csc/topQuestions.php.<br />
Accessed on March 14, 2005.<br />
75 See Mark D. Hartwig and Stephen C. Meyer, “A Note to Teachers,” in Percival Davis and Dean H. Kenyon,<br />
Of Pandas and People (Dallas, TX: Haughton Publishing Co., 1993), 157.<br />
76 See Henry M. Morris, ed., Scientific Creationism (Public School Edition), (San Diego, CA: Creation-Life<br />
Publishers, 1974), 50-51.<br />
20