24.07.2013 Views

Expert Witness Report - National Center for Science Education

Expert Witness Report - National Center for Science Education

Expert Witness Report - National Center for Science Education

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Institute <strong>for</strong> Creation Research (YEC) (1980): “Today there are thousands of scientists<br />

who are creationists and who repudiate any <strong>for</strong>m of evolution in their analysis and use of<br />

scientific data. Creationist scientists can now be found in literally every discipline of<br />

science and their numbers are increasing rapidly.” 72<br />

Kenyon affidavit (1986): “Although students generally hear only one side on the origins<br />

question, increasing numbers of scientists are now abandoning evolution <strong>for</strong> a new<br />

scientific version of creationism. Creationist scientists now number in the hundreds,<br />

possibly in the thousands, in the States and other countries.” 73<br />

Discovery Institute’s <strong>Center</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Science</strong> and Culture, “Top Questions [on ID]”<br />

(2004): “Since Discovery Institute first published its statement of dissent <strong>for</strong>m Darwin in<br />

2001, more than 300 scientists have courageously stepped <strong>for</strong>ward and signed onto a<br />

growing list of scientists of all disciplines voicing their skepticism over the central tenets<br />

of Darwin’s theory of evolution.” 74<br />

Of Pandas and People (1993): “ Pandas gives students a much-needed opportunity to<br />

explore the evidence and arguments that have caused some scientists to doubt<br />

contemporary Darwinism. . . . Pandas helps students understand the case <strong>for</strong> intelligent<br />

design. Following a growing number of scientists and philosophers, the authors argue<br />

that life not only appears to have been intelligently designed but that it actually was.” 75<br />

2. Creationists reject natural explanations of such things as the origin of life.<br />

Henry Morris, ed., Scientific Creationism (1974) (YEC): “Creationists believe that this<br />

continued emphasis on the naturalistic or artificial production of living organisms is<br />

highly misleading. None of these phenomena would ever occur under natural<br />

conditions. . . . There is no [sic] slightest scientific evidence that life can come from nonlife.<br />

The creation model emphasizes the unique origin of life, at the creative word of a<br />

living Creator.” 76<br />

Kenyon affidavit (1986): “Until such evidence [that life on earth could have begun<br />

spontaneously by purely chemical and physical means] is <strong>for</strong>thcoming, one certainly<br />

72 See “The ICR Scientists,” Impact (August 1980), Institute <strong>for</strong> Creation Research, at<br />

www.icr.org/pubs/imp/imp-086.htm. Accessed on March 14 2005.<br />

73 See Kenyon, “Affidavit,” 61-62.<br />

74 See <strong>Center</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Science</strong> and Culture, “Top Questions,” at www.discovery.org/csc/topQuestions.php.<br />

Accessed on March 14, 2005.<br />

75 See Mark D. Hartwig and Stephen C. Meyer, “A Note to Teachers,” in Percival Davis and Dean H. Kenyon,<br />

Of Pandas and People (Dallas, TX: Haughton Publishing Co., 1993), 157.<br />

76 See Henry M. Morris, ed., Scientific Creationism (Public School Edition), (San Diego, CA: Creation-Life<br />

Publishers, 1974), 50-51.<br />

20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!