the structure of hebrews from three perspectives - Tyndale House
the structure of hebrews from three perspectives - Tyndale House
the structure of hebrews from three perspectives - Tyndale House
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
STANLEY: The Structure <strong>of</strong> Hebrews 259<br />
author’s argument, 31 meant to prepare <strong>the</strong> readers for what would<br />
follow, and if this section is a digression, <strong>the</strong> near repetition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> end<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> previous section at <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> this digression may be <strong>the</strong><br />
author’s way <strong>of</strong> helping himself and his readers back into <strong>the</strong> flow <strong>of</strong><br />
his argument, which would resume at 7:1. A fur<strong>the</strong>r indication that<br />
5:11-6:20 forms a unit is that, although it does remain connected to<br />
<strong>the</strong> context by <strong>the</strong> oath <strong>the</strong>me which can be found both before and<br />
after <strong>the</strong> digression, it does not follow directly <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> apparent<br />
announcement <strong>of</strong> subject in 5:9, 10. 32 Vanhoye understands this<br />
announcement as tripartite: 1) being made perfect, anticipating<br />
chapters 8 and 9, 2) he became a cause <strong>of</strong> eternal salvation,<br />
anticipating 10:1-18, and 3) he is designated high priest in <strong>the</strong> order <strong>of</strong><br />
Melchizedek, anticipating chapter 7. However, this does not seem to<br />
fit <strong>the</strong> content <strong>of</strong> chapters 8 and 9, which more naturally fit toge<strong>the</strong>r<br />
with 10:1-18, showing Christ as a cause <strong>of</strong> eternal salvation. It may be<br />
better to understand <strong>the</strong> participle ‘made perfect’ in verse 9 as looking<br />
back to what has gone before, and <strong>the</strong> announcement as consisting <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>three</strong> different parts: 1) to all those who obey him, anticipating<br />
chapters 11-13, 33 2) a cause <strong>of</strong> eternal salvation, anticipating chapters<br />
8-10, and 3) appointed by God high priest according to <strong>the</strong> order <strong>of</strong><br />
Melchizedek anticipating chapter 7. This understanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
announcement <strong>of</strong> subject in 5:9, 10 would stand against <strong>the</strong> divisions<br />
suggested by Vanhoye, because it provides no justification for<br />
grouping chapters 7-10 as a structural unit. Wills’ understanding <strong>of</strong><br />
8:1-10:25 as a complete cycle <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> word <strong>of</strong> exhortation form also<br />
stands against Vanhoye’s grouping <strong>of</strong> chapters 7-10, since chapter 7<br />
does not follow <strong>the</strong> word <strong>of</strong> exhortation pattern. 34 This change <strong>of</strong><br />
genre between chapters 7 and 8 affirms <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> a structural<br />
seam at this point.<br />
31Cf. F.D.V. Narborough, The Epistle to <strong>the</strong> Hebrews (The Clarendon Bible;<br />
Oxford: Clarendon, 1943) 102-106.<br />
325:8 looks back to <strong>the</strong> previous context (i.e. 2:10, 18; 4:15)<br />
33Cf. 11:8, <strong>the</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> fa<strong>the</strong>rly discipline in 12:7-11, and 13:7.<br />
34Wills, ‘The Form <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sermon in Hellenistic Judaism and Early Christianity’,<br />
282.