Pre-supposing?

More documents

Recommendations

Info

‘Local’ pps and ∂ • (7) A discussion between detectives A – For all I know, Mary may have used her car to return to the beach B – Ah, she has a car . . . A – I don’t know, I was just thinking aloud • Beaver’s definition ⇒ Detective A does not pp that Mary has a car because (s)he admits that Mary has used her car but does not accept that she has a car: admittance ⇒ acceptance 22
‘Local’ pps and ∂ • Beaver’s approach ⇒ no pp in (7) • Is (7) just an example of ‘intermediate accommodation’: ‘If Mary has a car, she might have used it’? But . . . 23
Page 1 and 2: Pre-supposing? Jacques Jayez ENS-LS
Page 3 and 4: Introduction • Different theories
Page 5 and 6: Introduction • Problem: does the
Page 7 and 8: Informativity of a pp • Notation
Page 9 and 10: Informativity and common ground •
Page 11 and 12: Informativity and common ground •
Page 13 and 14: Presuppositions and Heimian semanti
Page 19 and 20: Informative pps and ∂ • Def. of
Page 21: • admittance ⇒ acceptance ‘Lo
Page 25 and 26: ‘Local’ pps and ∂ • Beaver
Page 27 and 28: Consequences and options • Forms
Page 29 and 30: • Local projection Consequences a
Page 31 and 32: Pre-supposing • ψ pp φ = at the
Page 33 and 34: Pre-supposing • If ψ holds at w
Page 35 and 36: Pre-supposing • General strategy:
Page 37 and 38: Partiality • (12) Partiality w |=
Page 39 and 40: Partiality • (15) State updates 1
Page 41 and 42: Pre-supposing • The idea: the spe
Page 43 and 44: Pre-supposing: the definition • (
Page 45 and 46: • Df of pre-supposing Pre-supposi
Page 47 and 48: • Inferences = pps Pre-suppositio
Page 49 and 50: Communicated pps • What is commun
Page 51 and 52: Communicated pps • What is commun
Page 53 and 54: Communicated pps • (20) x communi
Page 55 and 56: • Refutation again Assertions, pp
Page 57 and 58: Assertions, pps and CIs • The loi
Page 59 and 60: Assertions, pps and CIs • Detacha
Page 61 and 62: • Pps are sometimes ‘detachable
Page 63 and 64: Assertions, pps and CIs • Suspend
Page 65 and 66: Communicated pps • Consequence: t
Page 67 and 68: Communicated pps • Temporal epist
Page 69 and 70: • Temporal updates Communicated p
Page 71 and 72: • pp update Communicated pps •
Page 73 and 74:
• Assertive updates Communicated
Page 75 and 76:
Summary • Assertion that φ by x:
Page 77 and 78:
References Beaver, David I. 1995. P
Page 79 and 80:
van der Sandt, Rob & Geurts, Bart.
show all

Pre-supposing?

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?