05.08.2013 Views

download a PDF of this edition - My High School Journalism

download a PDF of this edition - My High School Journalism

download a PDF of this edition - My High School Journalism

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

At <strong>this</strong> very moment, genocide is<br />

occurring in Sudan. This may come<br />

as a shock to many, but it’s been happening<br />

for nearly three years. The media isn’t<br />

shedding enough light<br />

on it, leaving people<br />

unawares.<br />

Not only is the<br />

media brushing aside<br />

Sudan, however—our<br />

own government is as<br />

well. On September<br />

9th, 2004, the United States<br />

rightfully acknowledged that genocide<br />

was occurring but has since failed to take<br />

action.<br />

Perhaps when Sudan can produce<br />

“weapons <strong>of</strong> mass destructions” they will<br />

be brought into the public eye. The attitude<br />

President George Bush has seemed to take<br />

on international affairs is “no weapons,<br />

why bother?”<br />

EDITORIALS<br />

SUMMER 2005 THE LIGHTNING STRIKE PAGE FIVE<br />

SUDAN<br />

Overlooked: Genocide in Sudan<br />

By SARA ASHEY<br />

Staff Writer<br />

MEDIA<br />

wrong; what’s happening in Iraq is awful.<br />

But the only way progress can be made<br />

is through<br />

a c t i o n .<br />

T h e<br />

U n i t e d<br />

S t a t e s<br />

and the<br />

U n i t e d<br />

N a t i o n s<br />

m u s t<br />

decree a<br />

force to<br />

p r o t e c t<br />

civilians in Sudan. What is<br />

happening there is atrocious. We, as a<br />

nation, as citizens <strong>of</strong> the world, face<br />

a simple choice; we must act now, or<br />

witness another chapter <strong>of</strong> injustice added<br />

to human history.<br />

Do we really need public broadcasting?<br />

By ALAN TARRAB<br />

Copy Editor<br />

During summer vacation, I was working<br />

as a courier with no one to keep me<br />

company except the<br />

radio. Sometimes<br />

I would listen to<br />

private radio stations,<br />

but I also listened to<br />

NPR, National Public<br />

Radio. As long as<br />

it exists, I plan on<br />

getting my tax money’s<br />

ASHEY<br />

TARRAB<br />

worth, avoiding commercials wherever<br />

possible.<br />

NPR is a subdivision <strong>of</strong> CPB, the<br />

Corporation for Public Broadcasting, a<br />

government agency created in 1967 to<br />

administer government subsidized media.<br />

The federal government gives $100<br />

million a year to public broadcasting while<br />

taxing its competitors (the private news<br />

Also, beside the genocide, for over<br />

two decades now there has been a civil<br />

war in Sudan. Christians in the south and<br />

government-supported Arab Muslims<br />

from the north, the Janjaweed, have<br />

fought over religious differences. In their<br />

wake, two million people have died.<br />

N o w<br />

t h e<br />

Janjaweed<br />

h a s<br />

t a r g e t e d<br />

civilians,<br />

rounding<br />

them up<br />

and killing<br />

them for<br />

the color<br />

<strong>of</strong> their<br />

Do you know about what’s happening<br />

in Sudan?<br />

NO<br />

YES<br />

20%<br />

skin, and where they live. Approximately<br />

400,000 have died, and that number grows<br />

every day.<br />

But almost all current news coverage<br />

has been based on the situation in Iraq<br />

and the “war on terrorism.” Don’t get me<br />

corporations pay corporate income tax).<br />

Why is it necessary to subsidize one<br />

specifi c radio station and TV channel while<br />

taxing the others? Running newspapers,<br />

radio stations, and television channels<br />

is pr<strong>of</strong>i table. Consumers will pay to buy<br />

newspapers and cable TV, and businesses<br />

will advertise in all forms <strong>of</strong> media to<br />

catch readers’ attention. Thus, in order<br />

to survive (and make money) the media<br />

need only keep readers interested through<br />

accurate, objective reporting, interesting<br />

feature writing and editorials that present<br />

novel points <strong>of</strong> view. The customers are the<br />

ultimate judge <strong>of</strong> what is or isn’t objective<br />

or interesting.<br />

Public broadcasting doesn’t answer to<br />

the people directly. Instead it must please<br />

the government. If the government gives<br />

public broadcasting freedom, the staff is<br />

unaccountable and may become biased, or<br />

they may discuss topics that don’t interest<br />

the public.<br />

Now the Janjaweed has<br />

targeted civilians, rounding<br />

them up and killing them for<br />

the color <strong>of</strong> their skin.<br />

SUPREME COURT CARTOON BY DREW LERMAN<br />

Supreme Court nominee unfi t for bench<br />

By BENJAMIN HYMAN<br />

Staff Writer<br />

As Sandra Day O’Connor steps down<br />

from the Supreme Court in June, and<br />

Bush and a majority Republican Senate<br />

choose her replacement, the nominee<br />

will be confi rmed to <strong>of</strong>fi ce without any<br />

real opposition.<br />

O’Connor represents the woman’s<br />

vote along with Ruth Bader Ginsberg.<br />

Needless to say, the fewer women on<br />

the bench, the less pull women have in<br />

topics like abortion. O’Connor has been<br />

consistently pro-abortion and if Roe v.<br />

Wade is called into question again with<br />

a conservative in O’Connor’s place, we<br />

may see the end <strong>of</strong> legalized abortion.<br />

John Roberts, the nominee to replace<br />

O’Connor, has a terrifi c track record as<br />

an attorney. He attended Harvard Law,<br />

served under William Rehnquist in the<br />

early Regan years, and then Bush Sr.<br />

He then returned to law fi rm Hogan &<br />

Hartson as a partner and became the head<br />

<strong>of</strong> the fi rm’s appellate practice, and soon<br />

after became a D.C.<br />

Circuit Judge in<br />

2003.<br />

Regardless <strong>of</strong><br />

his impressive<br />

l e g a l<br />

b a c k g r o u n d ,<br />

I am not<br />

impressed with<br />

his stances on<br />

key issues.<br />

R o b e r t s ’ s<br />

propositions<br />

are unfair and<br />

illogical. He<br />

agrees with prayer<br />

in federally funded<br />

public schools, but<br />

believes doctors<br />

r e c e i v i n g<br />

federal dollars<br />

shouldn’t speak<br />

to women about abortion.<br />

John Roberts represents a very<br />

80%<br />

dangerous new trend in our culture<br />

He represents the new wave <strong>of</strong> rash<br />

conservatism. He represents how society<br />

is once again tolerating intolerance.<br />

The nomination <strong>of</strong> John Roberts<br />

vividly illustrates the devolution<br />

<strong>of</strong> our society into the dark ages.<br />

The Supreme Court was<br />

created to determine the<br />

constitutionality <strong>of</strong> laws. John<br />

Roberts’ own biases will prevent<br />

him from doing his job as a justice.<br />

His ideals clearly violate the tenet<br />

<strong>of</strong> separation <strong>of</strong> church and state in<br />

the constitution. How can a Justice<br />

<strong>of</strong> the highest court in the country be<br />

expected to protect the law <strong>of</strong> the<br />

land when he himself violates<br />

it?<br />

A moderate bench is the<br />

only answer. Justices should<br />

represent the population at<br />

large, not a small percentage<br />

determined by the president<br />

at the time <strong>of</strong> nomination.<br />

Why is it necessary to<br />

subsidize one specifi c radio<br />

station and TV channel while<br />

taxing the others?<br />

If the government imposes strict<br />

controls, the independence <strong>of</strong> the media is<br />

jeopardized. Part <strong>of</strong> the role <strong>of</strong> the media<br />

is to keep the government in check by<br />

exposing corruption, ineffi ciency, and<br />

abuse <strong>of</strong> power. A state-run media, as shown<br />

by experience in totalitarian nations, is not<br />

effective in its “watchdog” function.<br />

Any attempt at imposing “objectivity”<br />

can be perceived as imposing the current<br />

administration’s point <strong>of</strong> view; and too<br />

much freedom can lead to sloppy reporting.<br />

Either way, we lose.<br />

The best solution is simply to eliminate<br />

public broadcasting, letting the private<br />

media police itself. Any government<br />

attempts to insert itself into the media<br />

market is bound to fail.<br />

MEDIA<br />

The degradation <strong>of</strong><br />

information<br />

A<br />

democracy is only as strong<br />

as its most ignorant citizen.<br />

I base <strong>this</strong> on the idea that<br />

people, with the information to do so,<br />

will actively and responsibly pursue<br />

the best interests <strong>of</strong> society.<br />

As technology in communication<br />

progresses, great strides are being<br />

made in the business <strong>of</strong> information<br />

acquisition—news gathering,<br />

essentially. Leads are developed<br />

quicker, facts are checked faster and<br />

the time it takes <strong>this</strong> information to get<br />

to the reader has been cut substantially.<br />

Ironically, at a time <strong>of</strong> such<br />

technological progress, the truth seems<br />

less clearly defi ned than ever. And it’s<br />

all the TV’s fault.<br />

As readership <strong>of</strong> newspapers<br />

declines across the country, Americans<br />

are attempting, in increasing numbers,<br />

to fi ll <strong>this</strong> gap with television news.<br />

LOST IN TRANSLATION<br />

If <strong>this</strong> were simply a change<br />

<strong>of</strong> format, if it was just the news<br />

packaged in a brighter, friendlier<br />

design, there would be no problem.<br />

But the conversion from print to<br />

broadcast media is anything but<br />

smooth. Detail and analysis usually<br />

associated with newspapers are <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

lost in the adaptation. Citizens relying<br />

exclusively on TV news are left with<br />

a cursory, fragmented understanding<br />

<strong>of</strong> events and occurrences around the<br />

world, clearly not enough to make a<br />

thoughtful decision.<br />

Ignorance is affecting our ability<br />

to rule the nation in a responsible<br />

manner. Ignorance <strong>of</strong> the effects <strong>of</strong><br />

government decisions. Ignorance<br />

<strong>of</strong> world affairs and sentiment. For<br />

every new consumer attracted to the<br />

glowing, glittery appeal <strong>of</strong> TV news,<br />

another potentially informed voter is<br />

lost.<br />

ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENT<br />

Such is the price <strong>of</strong> progress;<br />

something is lost by gains in<br />

technology. But it doesn’t have to<br />

be. Steps can be taken to improve<br />

broadcast media—to fi ll with value the<br />

24 hours <strong>of</strong> news programming some<br />

stations boast. The control <strong>of</strong> huge<br />

news corporations can be restricted,<br />

whose bland coverage <strong>of</strong> world events<br />

<strong>of</strong>fers little insight <strong>of</strong> the bigger<br />

picture. Fresh competition can be<br />

restored to the TV news arena.<br />

On the other hand, the internet<br />

and its new form <strong>of</strong> media—web<br />

logs, online newspapers—promises to<br />

take the place <strong>of</strong> print journalism in a<br />

positive way. But not every American<br />

reads their news online, let alone has<br />

a computer in their home. It will be<br />

some time before the internet eclipses<br />

the popularity <strong>of</strong> TV.<br />

The printed word is dying and<br />

there may be no way to bring it back.<br />

This is unfortunate. But when it goes,<br />

it doesn’t have to commit the more<br />

serious crime <strong>of</strong> taking the quality <strong>of</strong><br />

information with it.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!