09.08.2013 Views

Top 10 HIV Clinical Developments of 2008 - CD8 T cells - The Body

Top 10 HIV Clinical Developments of 2008 - CD8 T cells - The Body

Top 10 HIV Clinical Developments of 2008 - CD8 T cells - The Body

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

34 • <strong>HIV</strong> JournalView—<strong>Top</strong> <strong>10</strong> <strong>HIV</strong> <strong>Clinical</strong> <strong>Developments</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>2008</strong><br />

approximately 150 days or less from more chronic<br />

infection.<br />

Specifically, the test looks at anti-<strong>HIV</strong> IgG<br />

(immunoglobulin G) levels compared to total<br />

IgG concentrations as it has been observed that<br />

anti-<strong>HIV</strong> antibodies increase relative to the total<br />

immunoglobulin level soon after acquisition <strong>of</strong> the<br />

virus. <strong>The</strong> combination <strong>of</strong> standard and BED testing<br />

is known as the serologic testing algorithm for<br />

recent <strong>HIV</strong> seroconversion (STARHS).<br />

In 2006, an estimated 39,400 people were<br />

diagnosed with <strong>HIV</strong> infection in the 22<br />

reporting states. Of the 6,864 <strong>HIV</strong>-seropositive<br />

specimens tested with the BED assay,<br />

31% were classified as recent infections.<br />

Extrapolating these data to the nation as a<br />

whole resulted in a new annual <strong>HIV</strong> incidence<br />

<strong>of</strong> 56,300 (95% CI, 48,200-64,500).<br />

This is a 40% increase from the previous estimates.<br />

Some have incorrectly misconstrued these results<br />

to mean there has been a 40% increase in the<br />

incidence <strong>of</strong> <strong>HIV</strong>—a misconception that should be<br />

corrected with an explanation that the analysis used<br />

a new method to estimate <strong>HIV</strong> incidence and found<br />

that prior estimates had been inaccurately low. In<br />

fact, overall <strong>HIV</strong> incidence has been relatively stable<br />

over the past few years, according to this report.<br />

FIGURE 18<br />

Over half <strong>of</strong> the new infections were among MSM and 45%<br />

were among black individuals. Using a model <strong>of</strong> extended<br />

back-calculation, the investigators estimated the number <strong>of</strong><br />

new infections from 1977 to 2006. <strong>The</strong> result was a picture<br />

<strong>of</strong> the domestic epidemic with a peak in incidence in the<br />

mid 1980s followed by a decline and smaller rise in the late<br />

1990s.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re were notable differences in trends <strong>of</strong> <strong>HIV</strong> incidence by<br />

race and risk category. MSM were the predominant group<br />

<strong>of</strong> infected persons early in the epidemic, but by 1988 to<br />

1989 the incidence in this population dropped below that <strong>of</strong><br />

injection drug users (IDUs).<br />

However, since 1990, <strong>HIV</strong> incidence among MSM has<br />

progressively increased. A disproportionate number <strong>of</strong> new<br />

infections have occurred among blacks; the incidence in<br />

this group climbed during the first decade <strong>of</strong> the epidemic<br />

and has remained fairly stable over the past several years.<br />

Incidence trends among women have also been largely<br />

unchanged in recent years.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Bottom Line<br />

<strong>The</strong> revised <strong>HIV</strong> incidence data paint a vivid and detailed<br />

picture <strong>of</strong> the epidemic in the United States and likely<br />

present a more accurate estimate <strong>of</strong> how many people<br />

acquire the virus. While the adjustment in the number <strong>of</strong><br />

new cases upward by approximately 40% was surprising,<br />

the finding that <strong>HIV</strong> remains concentrated among MSM and<br />

blacks is not.<br />

<strong>The</strong> rise, fall and resurgence<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>HIV</strong> among MSM is striking.<br />

Data from the National <strong>HIV</strong><br />

Behavioral Surveillance (NHBS)<br />

System point to an alarming<br />

increase in <strong>HIV</strong> acquisition<br />

among MSM between 13 to 24<br />

years <strong>of</strong> age, 41 demonstrating<br />

that <strong>of</strong>ficial and grassroots<br />

prevention messages are not<br />

adequately reaching or being<br />

received by this group <strong>of</strong> men.<br />

Likewise, the increased<br />

burden <strong>of</strong> <strong>HIV</strong> among African<br />

Americans can only invoke<br />

sadness. <strong>The</strong> Black AIDS<br />

Institute made the disturbing<br />

observation that if their<br />

numbers made up a separate<br />

country, <strong>HIV</strong>-infected African<br />

Americans would rank 16th in<br />

the world in <strong>HIV</strong> prevalence. 42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!