MSW-A Possible Solution to the Solar-Neutrino Problem
MSW-A Possible Solution to the Solar-Neutrino Problem
MSW-A Possible Solution to the Solar-Neutrino Problem
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>MSW</strong><br />
|(tt) [a 1 (tt)e iM 1 t cos a 2 (tt)e iM 2 t sin ] | e <br />
[a 1 (tt)e iM 1 t sin a 2 (tt)e iM 2 t cos ] | . (8)<br />
We next consider <strong>the</strong> neutrino as a superposition of flavor states:<br />
|(t) a e (t) | e a (t) | . (9)<br />
Because only electron neutrinos interact via charged currents, <strong>the</strong> two flavor states<br />
have different forward-scattering amplitudes, and each sees a different effective refractive<br />
index in matter. We assume that <strong>the</strong> change in <strong>the</strong> probability amplitudes a e (t) and<br />
a (t) during an infinitesimal time t can be expressed as a simple phase shift that is<br />
proportional <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> refractive index:<br />
a e (tt) a e (t) exp [ip (n nc n cc 1)t] a e (t)exp [i( )t , and (10a)<br />
a (tt) a (t) exp [ip (n nc 1)t] a (t)exp [i t] , (10b)<br />
where (2N e /p)f nc and 2G F N e . The latter relation is <strong>the</strong> matter<br />
oscillation term. We have also used x t. The neutrino state, <strong>the</strong>refore, evolves as<br />
|(tt) ae (t)ei( )t |e a (t)e i t | ae (t)eit |e a (t) | , (11)<br />
where again we have dropped <strong>the</strong> overall phase fac<strong>to</strong>r of exp(it) because it does not<br />
affect <strong>the</strong> final result. Equations (8) and (11) are expressions for |(t t). Equating<br />
<strong>the</strong> coefficients of | e and | results in a set of coupled equations:<br />
a 1 (tt)e iM 1 t cos a 2 (tt)e iM 2 t sin a e (t)e i( )t , (12a)<br />
a 1 (tt)e iM 1 t sin a 2 (tt)e iM 2 t cos a (t)e i t . (12b)<br />
Both sides of Equations (12a) and (12b) are expanded <strong>to</strong> first order in t,<br />
[a 1 (t) a˙ 1 (t)t ia 1 (t)M 1 t]cos [a 2 (t) a˙ 2 (t)t ia 2 (t)M 2 t]sin a e (t)(1it) (13a)<br />
[a 1 (t) a˙ 1 (t)t ia 1 (t)M 1 t]sin [a 2 (t) a˙ 2 (t)t ia 2 (t)M 2 t]cos a (t) , (13b)<br />
where a dot indicates <strong>the</strong> time derivative. Equations (4c) and (4d) are used <strong>to</strong> express<br />
a 1 (t), . a 1 (t), a 2 (t), and . a 2 (t) in terms of a e (t), a e (t), a (t), and a (t). Following more algebraic<br />
operations,<br />
i .a˙ e (t) [M 1 cos 2 M 2 sin 2 ]a e (t) (M 2 M 1 )cos sin a (t) , (14a)<br />
a˙ (t) (M 2 M 1 )cos sin a e (t) [M 1 sin 2 M 2 cos 2 ]a (t) . (14b)<br />
These expressions can be cast in a Schrödinger-like equation for a column matrix A<br />
consisting of <strong>the</strong> probability amplitudes a e (t) and a (t):<br />
dA<br />
i HA ,<br />
dt<br />
(15)<br />
where H and A M1cos ae (t)<br />
a (t)<br />
2 M2sin2 (M2 M1 )cos sin <br />
(M2 M1 )cos sin M1sin2 M2cos2 62 Los Alamos Science Number 25 1997<br />
The eigenvalues of <strong>the</strong> matrix H are given by<br />
<br />
1,2 . (16)<br />
Equation (15) can <strong>the</strong>n be solved:<br />
e<br />
A(t) I H A(0) , (17)<br />
where I is <strong>the</strong> identity matrix. At time t 0, <strong>the</strong> beam consists only of electron<br />
neutrinos. Thus, ae (0) 1, and a (0) 0 so that<br />
i 2 t ei 1 t<br />
<br />
2e<br />
<br />
2 <br />
1<br />
i 1 t <br />
1ei 2 t<br />
<br />
<br />
2 <br />
1<br />
2 (M 2 M 1 ) 2 1 2 2(M 2 M 1 cos ) 2<br />
<br />
2<br />
2<br />
ae (t) (M1cos2 + M2sin2 e<br />
) ,(18a)<br />
i 2 t ei 1 t<br />
<br />
2e<br />
<br />
2 <br />
1<br />
i 1 t <br />
1ei 2 t<br />
<br />
2 <br />
1<br />
e<br />
a (t) (M2 M1 )cos sin . (18b)<br />
i 2 t ei 1 t<br />
<br />
2 <br />
1<br />
The probability of detecting a muon neutrino after a time t is given by<br />
P <strong>MSW</strong> ( e → ) (t) 2 a e (t) e a (t) 2 a (t) 2 (19)<br />
so that<br />
(M2 M1 )<br />
P<strong>MSW</strong> (e → ) <br />
2(1 cos(<br />
2 1 )t)<br />
2cos2 sin2 <br />
(<br />
2 <br />
1 ) 2<br />
sin2 t . (20)<br />
By substituting in <strong>the</strong> expressions for <br />
1 , <br />
2 , M1 , M2 , we have<br />
(2 1 ) 2 (M2 M1 ) 2 sin2 (M ( )<br />
2 M1 ) 2 1<br />
<br />
2<br />
<br />
2<br />
2 cos2 M2<br />
M1 2sin22 <br />
( )<br />
2 1 2<br />
(21a)<br />
m<br />
(M2 M1 ) . (21b)<br />
2<br />
m<br />
<br />
2E<br />
2<br />
<br />
2p<br />
Recalling that x t, and 2G F N e ,we arrive at <strong>the</strong> <strong>MSW</strong> probability for<br />
an electron neutrino <strong>to</strong> oscillate in<strong>to</strong> a muon neutrino:<br />
P<strong>MSW</strong> (e → ) sin2 sin xW<br />
, (22)<br />
<br />
22 <br />
W2 W2 sin22 2G F Ne cos 22 2E<br />
, (23)<br />
m2 where is <strong>the</strong> in vacuo oscillation length,<br />
2E = 2 <br />
m2 , (24)<br />
and m 2 m 2 2 m1 2 is required <strong>to</strong> be nonzero. If <strong>the</strong> numerical values of <strong>the</strong><br />
hidden fac<strong>to</strong>rs of h _ and c are included, <strong>the</strong> expression for <strong>the</strong> oscillation length<br />
becomes E/1.27m 2 . ■<br />
Number 25 1997 Los Alamos Science<br />
<strong>MSW</strong>