status quo of quo vadis? - KCE
status quo of quo vadis? - KCE
status quo of quo vadis? - KCE
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
20 Quality development in general practice in Belgium: <strong>status</strong> <strong>quo</strong> or <strong>quo</strong> <strong>vadis</strong> ? <strong>KCE</strong> Reports 76<br />
Keypoints from the literature review<br />
• Most papers come from the UK, Australia and the Netherlands. The<br />
major elements in the development <strong>of</strong> quality systems are a national<br />
policy, a pr<strong>of</strong>essional leadership and a careful choice <strong>of</strong> incentives for the<br />
GPs.<br />
• A systematic review concluded that peer reviews, practice audits and<br />
practice visits are the most common instruments used in the quality<br />
systems in general practice. There is a lack <strong>of</strong> literature about their<br />
effects on the quality <strong>of</strong> care, even if studies show the satisfaction <strong>of</strong> the<br />
participants.<br />
• The literature about the UK Quality Outcomes Framework analyses the<br />
positive and negative effects <strong>of</strong> a pay for quality system. The<br />
implementation <strong>of</strong> this scheme requires considerable budget and there is<br />
a lack <strong>of</strong> agreement about the choice <strong>of</strong> indicators that only reflect a<br />
small part <strong>of</strong> the GP daily work.<br />
• Three international initiatives refer to the measurement <strong>of</strong> quality in<br />
general practice i.e., the OECD clinical quality indicators, the European<br />
Practice Assessment instrument and the Maturity Matrix.<br />
• Many papers describe initiatives in self-selected practices and the results<br />
might not be applicable to the whole GP population.<br />
• There is a lack <strong>of</strong> evidence about the effect <strong>of</strong> any quality system on the<br />
outcomes at the patient level.<br />
2.4 DESCRIPTION OF THE QUALITY SYSTEM IN THE FIVE<br />
SELECTED COUNTRIES<br />
This analysis begins with an overview <strong>of</strong> the characteristics <strong>of</strong> the health care systems <strong>of</strong><br />
the five selected countries (see table 3). The information comes mainly from the ‘HIT<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>iles’ <strong>of</strong> the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies 80-84,5 and from the<br />
statistics <strong>of</strong> the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 6 . The<br />
websites <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional bodies, national and international organisations completed this<br />
data source (see appendix 2). The appendix 3 displays the list <strong>of</strong> native experts who<br />
checked and completed the descriptions <strong>of</strong> their countries.