10.08.2013 Views

status quo of quo vadis? - KCE

status quo of quo vadis? - KCE

status quo of quo vadis? - KCE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

20 Quality development in general practice in Belgium: <strong>status</strong> <strong>quo</strong> or <strong>quo</strong> <strong>vadis</strong> ? <strong>KCE</strong> Reports 76<br />

Keypoints from the literature review<br />

• Most papers come from the UK, Australia and the Netherlands. The<br />

major elements in the development <strong>of</strong> quality systems are a national<br />

policy, a pr<strong>of</strong>essional leadership and a careful choice <strong>of</strong> incentives for the<br />

GPs.<br />

• A systematic review concluded that peer reviews, practice audits and<br />

practice visits are the most common instruments used in the quality<br />

systems in general practice. There is a lack <strong>of</strong> literature about their<br />

effects on the quality <strong>of</strong> care, even if studies show the satisfaction <strong>of</strong> the<br />

participants.<br />

• The literature about the UK Quality Outcomes Framework analyses the<br />

positive and negative effects <strong>of</strong> a pay for quality system. The<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> this scheme requires considerable budget and there is<br />

a lack <strong>of</strong> agreement about the choice <strong>of</strong> indicators that only reflect a<br />

small part <strong>of</strong> the GP daily work.<br />

• Three international initiatives refer to the measurement <strong>of</strong> quality in<br />

general practice i.e., the OECD clinical quality indicators, the European<br />

Practice Assessment instrument and the Maturity Matrix.<br />

• Many papers describe initiatives in self-selected practices and the results<br />

might not be applicable to the whole GP population.<br />

• There is a lack <strong>of</strong> evidence about the effect <strong>of</strong> any quality system on the<br />

outcomes at the patient level.<br />

2.4 DESCRIPTION OF THE QUALITY SYSTEM IN THE FIVE<br />

SELECTED COUNTRIES<br />

This analysis begins with an overview <strong>of</strong> the characteristics <strong>of</strong> the health care systems <strong>of</strong><br />

the five selected countries (see table 3). The information comes mainly from the ‘HIT<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>iles’ <strong>of</strong> the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies 80-84,5 and from the<br />

statistics <strong>of</strong> the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 6 . The<br />

websites <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional bodies, national and international organisations completed this<br />

data source (see appendix 2). The appendix 3 displays the list <strong>of</strong> native experts who<br />

checked and completed the descriptions <strong>of</strong> their countries.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!