10.08.2013 Views

Het referentieprijssysteem en socio-economische verschillen ... - KCE

Het referentieprijssysteem en socio-economische verschillen ... - KCE

Het referentieprijssysteem en socio-economische verschillen ... - KCE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>KCE</strong> Reports 126 Refer<strong>en</strong>ce Price System 23<br />

With regard to the revision frequ<strong>en</strong>cy, the refer<strong>en</strong>ce price level was initially reviewed<br />

every six months (on 1 January and on 1 July) by the administration of the National<br />

Institute for Health and Disability Insurance (INAMI/RIZIV). Since 1 May 2009, the<br />

revision frequ<strong>en</strong>cy of the refer<strong>en</strong>ce price level and refer<strong>en</strong>ce groups has increased to<br />

four times a year (on 1 January, 1 April, 1 July and 1 October). 42<br />

2.4.4 The security margin<br />

Concerned about the additional cost borne by pati<strong>en</strong>ts, the Belgian legislator introduced<br />

a legal upper-limit on the refer<strong>en</strong>ce supplem<strong>en</strong>t (modification of §3, article 35ter of the<br />

Law of 23 December 2009 44 ) in effect on 1 April 2010. This so-called ‘security margin’<br />

aims to exclude from the reimbursem<strong>en</strong>t list all drugs for which the refer<strong>en</strong>ce<br />

supplem<strong>en</strong>t is more than 25% of the reimbursem<strong>en</strong>t basis (with a maximum of €10.80).<br />

The security margin is meant to <strong>en</strong>courage pharmaceutical companies to decrease their<br />

prices and to grant pati<strong>en</strong>ts a new financial protection.<br />

2.4.5 Exemptions<br />

As the scope of the Belgian RPS was progressively <strong>en</strong>larged, exemptions were specified<br />

simultaneously to limit, in some cases, the reach of the ext<strong>en</strong>sions.<br />

Firstly, with regard to the <strong>en</strong>largem<strong>en</strong>t in July 2005 which ext<strong>en</strong>ds the cluster definition<br />

to all pharmaceuticals with the same active ingredi<strong>en</strong>t, indep<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>tly of dosage and<br />

administration form, two types of exemptions were allowed:<br />

• Injectable pharmaceuticals for which the reimbursed cheaper alternative does<br />

not have the injectable form, does not <strong>en</strong>ter the RPS;<br />

• Pharmaceuticals, whose administration form is accepted to be a significant<br />

therapeutic added value compared with the cheaper alternative, can obtain an<br />

exception status by the DRC. The exemption request procedure is defined in<br />

article 55bis, §2bis of the Royal Decree of 21 December 2001 38 (introduced<br />

by the Royal Decree of 16 June 2005 37 and modified by the Royal Decree of<br />

19 January 2010).<br />

Secondly, with regard to the introduction of art. 35quater that <strong>en</strong>titled the DRC to<br />

specify a list of drugs with similar and/or analogous indications and mechanisms of action<br />

to drugs already in the RPS, the following exemption was specified:<br />

• Pharmaceuticals with prov<strong>en</strong> significant therapeutic added value linked with<br />

conv<strong>en</strong>i<strong>en</strong>ce of drug use, safety and/or effectiv<strong>en</strong>ess can obtain an exception<br />

status. This exemption request procedure is defined in article 55ter, al. 7-13<br />

of the Royal Decree of 21 December 2001 38 (introduced by the Royal<br />

Decree of 22 December 2005). 39<br />

Lastly, in January 2010 drugs for which the principal active ingredi<strong>en</strong>t(s) is/are variants of<br />

the principal active ingredi<strong>en</strong>t(s) of drugs already in the RPS moved from article<br />

35quater of the Coordinated Law (case-by-case application) to art. 35ter (‘by full right’<br />

application). As a result of this <strong>en</strong>largem<strong>en</strong>t, the above exemption request was<br />

app<strong>en</strong>ded in the art. 55bis, §2ter (introduced by the Royal Decree of 19 January 2010 45 ).<br />

2.4.6 Measures for physicians, pharmacists and pati<strong>en</strong>ts<br />

Like in many other countries that have implem<strong>en</strong>ted a RPS, the Belgian Minister of<br />

Social Affairs has progressively recognized the important role of physicians’,<br />

pharmacists’ and pati<strong>en</strong>ts’ behaviour in the demand and consumption of low cost drugs.<br />

He/she consequ<strong>en</strong>tly introduced a set of measures for these three groups to increase<br />

the effici<strong>en</strong>cy of the RPS and to boost the share of low cost drugs consumption.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!