12.08.2013 Views

Y - Bayhdolecentral

Y - Bayhdolecentral

Y - Bayhdolecentral

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Academia, Industry, and the Bayh-Dole Act: An Implied Duty to Commercialize _<br />

Henderson, Smith<br />

community service mission implicitly supports the<br />

broadest possible application ofnew medical<br />

technology so as to benefit broader society,<br />

something only possible through an active<br />

collaboration between the academic medical<br />

conununity and industry.<br />

Associations between individuals and entities entail<br />

risks as well as benefits, though it is important to<br />

realize that the risk involved in the academia-industry<br />

collaboration established by Bayh-Dole is, in effect, a<br />

product ofthe Act's implied duty to commercialize.<br />

The inevitable existence ofsuch risks, such as<br />

financial conflict-of-interest, should not distract<br />

society from the larger benefit derived from<br />

academia-industry collaboration, nor should it be<br />

allowed to defeat the strong societal statement made<br />

by Bayh-Dole. Rather, their existence should serve<br />

as a reminder to academia, government and industry<br />

to identify and mitigate risks associated with<br />

commercialization ofacademic research, so as to<br />

maximize the benefit to society from governmentfunded<br />

research. By doing so, academia and industry<br />

will continue to fulfill the vision that is Bayh-Dole,<br />

and continue the impressive record ofachievement<br />

that has provided so much benefit to society.<br />

References<br />

1 Bayh-Dole University and Small Business Patent<br />

Procedures Act ofDec. 12, 1980, Pnb. L. No. 96-517,<br />

94 Stat. 3015-3028 (codified as amended at 35<br />

U.S.C. § § 200-211, 301-307 (1994)).<br />

2 See Rebecca S. Eisenberg, Public Research and<br />

Private Development: Patents and Technology<br />

Transfer in Government-Sponsored Research, 82 VA.<br />

L. REv. 1663 (1996), at footnote 2 (listing federal<br />

legislation encouraging or requiring federal agencies<br />

to make federally-supported research available to the<br />

fublic through govermnent ownership).<br />

United States Government Accounting Office<br />

(GAO) Report to Congressional Committees entitled<br />

"Technology Transfer, Administration ofthe Bayh­<br />

Dole Act by Research Universities" dated May 7,<br />

1998 at 3.<br />

4 National Patent Planning Commission,<br />

Government-Owned Patents and Inventions of<br />

Government Employees and Contractors, reprinted<br />

in, 2 Subcommittee on Domestic and Int'l Scientific<br />

Planning and Analysis ofthe House Conun. on<br />

Science and Tech., 94 th Cong., Background Materials<br />

on Government Patent Policies: Reports of<br />

8<br />

October 2002<br />

Committees, Commissions, and Major Studies xi<br />

(Conun. Print 1976) at 1-12 (1945).<br />

5 Attorney General ofthe United States, Investigation<br />

ofGovernment Patent Practices and Policies: Report<br />

and Reconunendations ofthe Attorney General to the<br />

President, partially reprinted in, 2 Subcommittee on<br />

Domestic and Int'! Scientific Planning and Analysis<br />

ofthe House Comm. on Science and Tech., 94 th<br />

Cong., Background Materials on Government Patent<br />

Policies: Reports ofCommittees, Commissions, and<br />

Major Studies xi (Conun. Print 1976), at 15,17-21<br />

(1947).<br />

6 See generally Eisenberg, supra note 2 at 1674-1675.<br />

7 See id.<br />

S See generally Eisenberg, supra note 2, at 1676­<br />

1690.<br />

9 See id.<br />

10 Commission on Government Procurement, 1972<br />

Report, partially reprinted in 2 Subconunittee on<br />

Domestic and Int'I Scientific Planning and Analysis<br />

ofthe House Comm. on Science and Tech., 94 th<br />

Cong., Background Materials on Government Patent<br />

Policies: Reports ofCommittees, Commissions, and<br />

Major Studies xi (Conun. Print 1976), at 185, 192.<br />

11 See id.<br />

12 Industrial Innovation Initiatives: Message to the<br />

Congress on Administration Actions and Proposals,<br />

Pub. Papers 2070, 2071 (Oct. 31, 1979).<br />

13 See Eisenberg, supra note 2, at 1691.<br />

14 See 35 U.S.c. § § 200-211, at § 201(b).<br />

15 See id. at § 202.<br />

16 See id.<br />

17 See td.<br />

18 See id.<br />

19 See td.<br />

20 See 35 U.S.C. § 203.<br />

21 See Memorandum to the Heads ofExecutive<br />

Departments and Agencies: Government Patent<br />

Policy, Pnb. Papers 248 (Feb. 18, 1983).<br />

2Z See S. Rep. No. 98-662, at 2 (1984), reprinted in<br />

1984 u.S.C.C.A.N. 5799, 5800.<br />

23 See 35 U.S.C. § 200.<br />

24 See id.<br />

2S See id.<br />

26 See id. at § 202.<br />

27 See id. at §202(a).<br />

28 See id. at §201(e).<br />

29 See id. at § 201(b).<br />

30 See id. at § 202(c)(3).<br />

31 See id. at § 202(c)(5).<br />

32 See id. at § 203.<br />

33 See id. at § 203(1)(a).<br />

34 See id. at § 201(!).<br />

35 See id. at § 203(1).<br />

36 See id. at § 209.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!