Y - Bayhdolecentral
Y - Bayhdolecentral
Y - Bayhdolecentral
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Academia, Industry, and the Bayh-Dole Act: An Implied Duty to Commercialize _<br />
Henderson, Smith<br />
community service mission implicitly supports the<br />
broadest possible application ofnew medical<br />
technology so as to benefit broader society,<br />
something only possible through an active<br />
collaboration between the academic medical<br />
conununity and industry.<br />
Associations between individuals and entities entail<br />
risks as well as benefits, though it is important to<br />
realize that the risk involved in the academia-industry<br />
collaboration established by Bayh-Dole is, in effect, a<br />
product ofthe Act's implied duty to commercialize.<br />
The inevitable existence ofsuch risks, such as<br />
financial conflict-of-interest, should not distract<br />
society from the larger benefit derived from<br />
academia-industry collaboration, nor should it be<br />
allowed to defeat the strong societal statement made<br />
by Bayh-Dole. Rather, their existence should serve<br />
as a reminder to academia, government and industry<br />
to identify and mitigate risks associated with<br />
commercialization ofacademic research, so as to<br />
maximize the benefit to society from governmentfunded<br />
research. By doing so, academia and industry<br />
will continue to fulfill the vision that is Bayh-Dole,<br />
and continue the impressive record ofachievement<br />
that has provided so much benefit to society.<br />
References<br />
1 Bayh-Dole University and Small Business Patent<br />
Procedures Act ofDec. 12, 1980, Pnb. L. No. 96-517,<br />
94 Stat. 3015-3028 (codified as amended at 35<br />
U.S.C. § § 200-211, 301-307 (1994)).<br />
2 See Rebecca S. Eisenberg, Public Research and<br />
Private Development: Patents and Technology<br />
Transfer in Government-Sponsored Research, 82 VA.<br />
L. REv. 1663 (1996), at footnote 2 (listing federal<br />
legislation encouraging or requiring federal agencies<br />
to make federally-supported research available to the<br />
fublic through govermnent ownership).<br />
United States Government Accounting Office<br />
(GAO) Report to Congressional Committees entitled<br />
"Technology Transfer, Administration ofthe Bayh<br />
Dole Act by Research Universities" dated May 7,<br />
1998 at 3.<br />
4 National Patent Planning Commission,<br />
Government-Owned Patents and Inventions of<br />
Government Employees and Contractors, reprinted<br />
in, 2 Subcommittee on Domestic and Int'l Scientific<br />
Planning and Analysis ofthe House Conun. on<br />
Science and Tech., 94 th Cong., Background Materials<br />
on Government Patent Policies: Reports of<br />
8<br />
October 2002<br />
Committees, Commissions, and Major Studies xi<br />
(Conun. Print 1976) at 1-12 (1945).<br />
5 Attorney General ofthe United States, Investigation<br />
ofGovernment Patent Practices and Policies: Report<br />
and Reconunendations ofthe Attorney General to the<br />
President, partially reprinted in, 2 Subcommittee on<br />
Domestic and Int'! Scientific Planning and Analysis<br />
ofthe House Comm. on Science and Tech., 94 th<br />
Cong., Background Materials on Government Patent<br />
Policies: Reports ofCommittees, Commissions, and<br />
Major Studies xi (Conun. Print 1976), at 15,17-21<br />
(1947).<br />
6 See generally Eisenberg, supra note 2 at 1674-1675.<br />
7 See id.<br />
S See generally Eisenberg, supra note 2, at 1676<br />
1690.<br />
9 See id.<br />
10 Commission on Government Procurement, 1972<br />
Report, partially reprinted in 2 Subconunittee on<br />
Domestic and Int'I Scientific Planning and Analysis<br />
ofthe House Comm. on Science and Tech., 94 th<br />
Cong., Background Materials on Government Patent<br />
Policies: Reports ofCommittees, Commissions, and<br />
Major Studies xi (Conun. Print 1976), at 185, 192.<br />
11 See id.<br />
12 Industrial Innovation Initiatives: Message to the<br />
Congress on Administration Actions and Proposals,<br />
Pub. Papers 2070, 2071 (Oct. 31, 1979).<br />
13 See Eisenberg, supra note 2, at 1691.<br />
14 See 35 U.S.c. § § 200-211, at § 201(b).<br />
15 See id. at § 202.<br />
16 See id.<br />
17 See td.<br />
18 See id.<br />
19 See td.<br />
20 See 35 U.S.C. § 203.<br />
21 See Memorandum to the Heads ofExecutive<br />
Departments and Agencies: Government Patent<br />
Policy, Pnb. Papers 248 (Feb. 18, 1983).<br />
2Z See S. Rep. No. 98-662, at 2 (1984), reprinted in<br />
1984 u.S.C.C.A.N. 5799, 5800.<br />
23 See 35 U.S.C. § 200.<br />
24 See id.<br />
2S See id.<br />
26 See id. at § 202.<br />
27 See id. at §202(a).<br />
28 See id. at §201(e).<br />
29 See id. at § 201(b).<br />
30 See id. at § 202(c)(3).<br />
31 See id. at § 202(c)(5).<br />
32 See id. at § 203.<br />
33 See id. at § 203(1)(a).<br />
34 See id. at § 201(!).<br />
35 See id. at § 203(1).<br />
36 See id. at § 209.