16.08.2013 Views

UNIVERSITY OF DURBAN-WESTVILLE

UNIVERSITY OF DURBAN-WESTVILLE

UNIVERSITY OF DURBAN-WESTVILLE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.1.1. Analytic induction<br />

To uncover constructs which explain the regularities in the social world, analytic<br />

induction uses an iterative procedure - a succession of question and answer cycles.<br />

Cressey (quoted in Plummer 1983) used this mode of analysis in the 1950's, and he<br />

indicates the procedures for analytic induction as follows:<br />

1. A rough definition ofthe phenomenon to be explained is formulated.<br />

11. A hypothetical explanation of that phenomenon is formulated.<br />

111. One case is studied in the light of the hypothesis with the object of determining<br />

whether the hypothesis fits the facts in that case.<br />

IV. If the hypothesis does not fit the facts, either the hypothesis is reformulated or the<br />

phenomenon to be explained is redefined. The new definition must be more<br />

precise than the first one.<br />

v. Practical certainty may be obtained after a small number of cases have been<br />

examined, but the discovery of a single negative case disproves the explanation<br />

and requires a reformulation.<br />

VI. This procedure of examining cases, re-defining the phenomena and reformulating<br />

the hypothesis is continued until a universal relationship is established, each<br />

negative case calling for a re-definition or a reformulation.<br />

vu. For purposes of proof, cases outside the area circumscribed by the definition are<br />

examined to determine whether or not the final hypothesis applies to them. This<br />

step is in keeping with the observation that scientific generalisations consist of<br />

descriptions of conditions, which are always present, when the phenomenon is<br />

present but which are never present when the phenomenon is absent.<br />

2.1.2. Grounded theory approach<br />

The goal in a grounded theory approach is to produce theories from data rather<br />

than from some apriori conceptualisation. Bryman and Burgess (1995) describe the<br />

steps proposed by Glaser and Strauss for grounded theory analyses. After some data<br />

collection and reflection on the general area of concern, the researcher generates<br />

'categories' which fit the data. The researcher then moves from one particular sampling<br />

source to another according to theoretically relevant criteria that have evolved from the<br />

previous case. The researcher then attempts to formulate more abstract expressions of<br />

these categories. Hypotheses about links between categories need to be formulated and<br />

272

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!