21.08.2013 Views

Analysis of a ferric leghemoglobin reductase from cowpea (Vigna ...

Analysis of a ferric leghemoglobin reductase from cowpea (Vigna ...

Analysis of a ferric leghemoglobin reductase from cowpea (Vigna ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

164<br />

though approximately 50% <strong>of</strong> the total activity<br />

was lost. A 40-fold decrease in the ratio <strong>of</strong> diaphorase<br />

to FLbR activity (Table 1) indicated that<br />

many <strong>of</strong> the other contaminating diaphorases were<br />

removed at this step. On the FPLC anion exchange<br />

column, FLbR was eluted as a sharp peak<br />

at about 15% <strong>of</strong> NaCl gradient (150 mM NaCl,<br />

Fig. 1). The specific activity <strong>of</strong> the purified <strong>cowpea</strong><br />

FLbR was about 50% <strong>of</strong> that reported for the<br />

soybean enzyme [7]. The difference in the specific<br />

activities between the <strong>cowpea</strong> and soybean FLbRs<br />

could result <strong>from</strong> inherent differences in the two<br />

enzymes.<br />

P. Luan et al. / Plant Science 154 (2000) 161–170<br />

Table 1<br />

Purification and specific activities <strong>of</strong> FLbR <strong>from</strong> <strong>cowpea</strong> nodule cytosol a<br />

3.2. Homogeneity and molecular weight analysis<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>cowpea</strong> FLbR<br />

Samples collected <strong>from</strong> each purification step<br />

were subjected to 10% SDS-PAGE and silver<br />

staining (Fig. 2). The sample after the Sephacryl<br />

S-200 step (lane 4) exhibited a single distinct<br />

protein band <strong>of</strong> about 55 kDa. The molecular<br />

weight for native <strong>cowpea</strong> FLbR was estimated to<br />

be 110 kDa using the Sephacryl S-200 SF column<br />

(data not shown) and thus appears to be a homodimer.<br />

These molecular weights were similar to<br />

those reported for soybean FLbR [7].<br />

Steps Total protein DCIP <strong>reductase</strong> (A) specific activity<br />

Ratio A/Bd FLbR (B) specific activity Total FLbR<br />

(mg) (U mg−1 ) c<br />

(U mg−1 ) b activity (U)<br />

Crude extract 893 187 0.22 194<br />

850<br />

G-25 607 254 0.29 176 875<br />

Hydroxylapatite<br />

4.5 368<br />

17.3<br />

78<br />

21.3<br />

Mono-Q 0.31 2289 162 50 14.1<br />

S-200 0.15 2565<br />

216 32 11.9<br />

a Purification steps are described in Section 2.<br />

b One unit is defined as 1 nmol <strong>of</strong> DCPIP reduced per min.<br />

c One unit is defined as 1 nmol <strong>of</strong> Lb 2+ O2 formed per min.<br />

d This is the ratio <strong>of</strong> DCPIP <strong>reductase</strong> (diaphorase) specific activity to FLbR specific activity.<br />

Fig. 1. Separation <strong>of</strong> FLbR by an ion-exchange FPLC on a Mono-Q HR5/5 column. The column was equilibrated with Buffer<br />

A (50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5), and eluted with a linear NaCl gradient <strong>from</strong> 0 to 35% <strong>of</strong> Buffer B (1 M NaCl, 50 mM Tris–HCl,<br />

pH 7.5) in 50 ml total volume (Buffer A plus Buffer B) at a flow rate <strong>of</strong> 1 ml min −1 . Cowpea FLbR was eluted at about 15%<br />

<strong>of</strong> the gradient (150 mM NaCl, as indicated by the arrow).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!