EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (Without Figures) rev - Town of Falmouth
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (Without Figures) rev - Town of Falmouth
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (Without Figures) rev - Town of Falmouth
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
environmental <strong>rev</strong>iew <strong>of</strong> this project. The ENF <strong>rev</strong>iew included a public hearing and site visit<br />
(bus tour <strong>of</strong> the Planning Area and the potential wastewater facility sites). Final comments were<br />
received and are attached in an appendix in this DCWMP/DEIR.<br />
ES.4 <strong>SUMMARY</strong> OF DETAILED EVALUATIONS TO REMEDIATE THE<br />
WASTEWATER PROBLEMS<br />
A. Initial Alternatives Evaluation. The alternatives selected for detailed evaluation (as<br />
discussed above) were evaluated in detail with cost development and the following findings are<br />
noted:<br />
1. The costs for the three alternatives were similar (within 8 percent <strong>of</strong> one another) due<br />
to the large wastewater collection component (sewers and pump stations) that is common to<br />
all. The costs for these alternatives are summarized later in this Executive Summary<br />
section.<br />
2. The MMR/Otis AFB WWTF site was the best site for the following reasons:<br />
It has the most space for a modern expandable treatment facility.<br />
It is located in the Planning Area.<br />
It does not have any abutting residential neighborhoods; therefore, “Not in my<br />
Back Yard” (NIMBY) opposition to this site would be the least <strong>of</strong> the three sites.<br />
It lends itself to becoming a regional facility also serving the towns <strong>of</strong> Mashpee,<br />
Sandwich, and Bourne as well as the MMR; and is consistent with Cape Cod<br />
Commission efforts to encourage regionalization where feasible.<br />
3. The <strong>Falmouth</strong> Country Club site has good infiltration capacity and could recharge a<br />
large flow <strong>of</strong> treated water; however, even with nitrogen removal to 3 mg/L and sewering<br />
up to 100% <strong>of</strong> the watersheds, the return <strong>of</strong> a large volume <strong>of</strong> treated water to the<br />
watersheds for recharge means that not all <strong>of</strong> the TMDLs can be met with infiltration at the<br />
<strong>Falmouth</strong> Country Club site as evaluated. These alternatives involving ENR treatment and<br />
recharge at the <strong>Falmouth</strong> Country Club site (Alternatives 1A, 2A and 3A) would meet the<br />
<strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Falmouth</strong>, MA ES-10<br />
Draft Comprehensive Wastewater Management Plan and<br />
Draft Environmental Impact Report<br />
7104510.6