01.09.2013 Views

Dutch Slavery and Slave Trade in the Indian Ocean

Dutch Slavery and Slave Trade in the Indian Ocean

Dutch Slavery and Slave Trade in the Indian Ocean

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

168 journal of world history, june 2003<br />

Assum<strong>in</strong>g average mortality rates en route of circa 20% on slav<strong>in</strong>g<br />

voyages, 240–480 company <strong>and</strong> 4,476–7,716 total <strong>Dutch</strong> slaves were<br />

exported annually from <strong>the</strong>ir respective catchment area. 88 To place<br />

<strong>the</strong>se numbers <strong>in</strong> a comparative global perspective, 9,500 slaves were<br />

exported each year <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> trans-Saharan slave trade <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> seventeenth<br />

century; 3,000 slaves were shipped annually from <strong>the</strong> Swahili <strong>and</strong> Red<br />

Sea coasts dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> same time period. In addition, 29,124 slaves were<br />

exported each year <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Atlantic slave trade dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> last quarter<br />

of <strong>the</strong> seventeenth century, 2,888 of which transported by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Dutch</strong><br />

West India Company. The exact volume of <strong>the</strong> Crimean Tatar trade<br />

<strong>in</strong> Polish <strong>and</strong> Russian slaves is impossible to gauge, though one<br />

(<strong>in</strong>flated) estimate suggests that <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> seventeenth century Pol<strong>and</strong><br />

lost an average of 20,000 captives yearly. In <strong>the</strong> period 1607–17 <strong>the</strong><br />

Tatars may have seized 100,000 Russians <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> next 30 years<br />

ano<strong>the</strong>r 100,000. 89 The volume of <strong>the</strong> total <strong>Dutch</strong> <strong>Indian</strong> <strong>Ocean</strong> slave<br />

trade was <strong>the</strong>refore 15–30% of <strong>the</strong> Atlantic slave trade, slightly smaller<br />

than <strong>the</strong> trans-Saharan slave trade, <strong>and</strong> one-<strong>and</strong>-a-half to three times<br />

<strong>the</strong> size of <strong>the</strong> Swahili <strong>and</strong> Red Sea coast <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Dutch</strong> West India<br />

Company slave trades.<br />

<strong>Slave</strong> Resistance <strong>and</strong> <strong>Slave</strong> Revolt<br />

With some notable exceptions, relationships of power <strong>in</strong> <strong>Dutch</strong> territories<br />

were tilted too heavily <strong>in</strong> favor of <strong>the</strong> owners for a large or even<br />

a medium-scale slave revolt to break out. The virtual absence of con-<br />

88 Of 2,467 slaves traded on 12 slave voyages from Batavia, India, <strong>and</strong> Madagascar<br />

between 1677 <strong>and</strong> 1701 to <strong>the</strong> Cape, 1,617 were l<strong>and</strong>ed—a loss of 850 slaves, or 34.45%.<br />

On 19 voyages between 1677 <strong>and</strong> 1732, <strong>the</strong> mortality rate was somewhat lower (22.7%).<br />

See Shell, “<strong><strong>Slave</strong>ry</strong> at <strong>the</strong> Cape of Good Hope, 1680–1731,” p. 332. Filliot estimated <strong>the</strong><br />

average mortality rate among slaves shipped from India <strong>and</strong> West Africa to <strong>the</strong> Mascarene<br />

Isl<strong>and</strong>s at 20–25% <strong>and</strong> 25–30%, respectively. Average mortality rates among slaves arriv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

from closer catchment areas were lower: 12% from Madagascar <strong>and</strong> 21% from East<br />

Africa. See Filliot, La Traite des Esclaves, p. 228; A.Toussa<strong>in</strong>t, La Route des Îles: Contribution<br />

à l’Histoire Maritime des Mascareignes (Paris, 1967), pp. 451, 454; Allen, “The Madagascar<br />

<strong>Slave</strong> <strong>Trade</strong> <strong>and</strong> Labor Migration.”<br />

89 Austen, “The Trans-Saharan <strong>Trade</strong>: A Tentative Census,” pp. 66, 68; Austen, “From<br />

<strong>the</strong> Atlantic to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Indian</strong> <strong>Ocean</strong>,” p. 136; Lovejoy, Transformations <strong>in</strong> <strong><strong>Slave</strong>ry</strong>, p. 47; Postma,<br />

The <strong>Dutch</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Atlantic <strong>Slave</strong> <strong>Trade</strong>, pp. 294–95, 303. For <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> numbers<br />

of slaves brought through <strong>the</strong> Crimea, see H. Inalcik, Sources <strong>and</strong> Studies on <strong>the</strong> Ottoman<br />

Black Sea. Vol. I: The Customs Registers of Caffa, 1487–1490 (Cambridge, Mass., 1996);<br />

A. Fisher, “Muscovy <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Black Sea <strong>Slave</strong> <strong>Trade</strong>,” Canadian-American Slavic Studies 6,<br />

no. 4 (1972):575–94, repr<strong>in</strong>ted <strong>in</strong> A. Fisher, A Precarious Balance: Conflict, <strong>Trade</strong>, <strong>and</strong> Diplomacy<br />

on <strong>the</strong> Russian-Ottoman Frontier (Istanbul, 1999).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!