05.09.2013 Views

NYS Threatens Huge Tax Hike For Island's Mitchell-Lamas

NYS Threatens Huge Tax Hike For Island's Mitchell-Lamas

NYS Threatens Huge Tax Hike For Island's Mitchell-Lamas

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2 • The Main Street WIRE, Sat., Nov. 17, 2007<br />

It is Time<br />

Published by The Main Street WIRE TM<br />

©2007 Unisource2000 Inc.<br />

531 Main St. #413, NYC10044<br />

The Editorial Page<br />

Many residents of Island House, Westview, and Rivercross<br />

came here, to a Roosevelt Island that New York State had made<br />

barely livable, to create a new community, on the strength of a<br />

New York State promise that they would, one day in a distant<br />

future, be the full-rights owners of their apartments.<br />

In the years since, they have succeeded in their part of the<br />

deal, creating a wonderful community on the strength of the<br />

minds and hearts they brought to the task. But also, in the<br />

years since, they have seen the State offer incredible sweetheart<br />

deals to deep-pockets developers who have grown wealthy<br />

on the State’s near giveaway of extraordinarily valuable land<br />

where apartments now rent and sell at embarrassingly high<br />

prices. They have given the State of New York pained forbearance<br />

while bunglers have come here to manage their community<br />

badly – given the task simply because they were someone’s<br />

buddy, political hanger-on, or partner in something slightly<br />

less than honorable.<br />

Now, that distant future has arrived, and under the law,<br />

those pioneer residents are entitled to treatment equal to that<br />

given to tenants and resident owners in other <strong>Mitchell</strong>-Lama<br />

buildings across the City and State.<br />

But the Spitzer administration is saying, “No, wait longer...<br />

the promise didn’t really count here. Wait into perpetuity for<br />

what you were promised.”<br />

It is time for that to stop. It’s time, now, for New York<br />

State to keep its promises to those who created community<br />

here. It is, quite simply, time for New York State to honor the<br />

deal it made so many years ago, and let Rivercross go private<br />

without restrictions, and let the tenants of Westview and Island<br />

House strike the best deal they can with the buildings’<br />

owners, and collect their reward of full-rights homeownership.<br />

It’s called equal treatment under the law.<br />

And it is time.<br />

DL<br />

A comment on the news:<br />

If The WIRE were the Daily News... ...this would be our page 1 today.<br />

TM<br />

Saturday, November 17, 2007<br />

TM<br />

28th Year as Roosevelt Island’s Independent Community Newspaper<br />

<strong>NYS</strong> TO RI –<br />

News 212-826-9055<br />

Urgent news 917-617-0449<br />

Advertising 917-587-3278 or<br />

212-751-8214<br />

Circulation 212-935-7534<br />

e-mail editor@MainStreetWIRE.com<br />

Website NYC10044 – nyc10044.com<br />

Managing Editor – Dick Lutz<br />

Reporters – Jami Bernard, Mary Camper-Titsingh, Rachel Durfee<br />

Photographers – Maria Casotti, Misha Cohen, Vicki Feinmel, Paul Katz<br />

Chief Proofreader – Linda Heimer<br />

Proofreaders – Ashton Barfield, Dick FitzPatrick, Lillian Shaman<br />

Advertising Sales – Ellen Levy, Stu Feit<br />

Circulation Managers – Sherie Helstien, Matthew Katz, Teri Sheridan<br />

Circulation Assistants – Dexter Benjamin, Gwen Ryals<br />

Human Resources – David Bauer<br />

Legal Counsel – A. Ross Wollen<br />

Website NYC10044 facilities – Frank Farance<br />

NYC10044.com Webmaster – Geddes Munson<br />

Circulation Assistant – Dexter Benjamin<br />

Founding Publisher – Jack Resnick<br />

Editor Emeritus – Jim Bowser<br />

Judi Arond, Bubu Arya, Steve Bessenof, Marcie Brown-Suarez, Lynn Chambers, Carol Chen,<br />

Mark Chipman, Vivianne Codderrens, Malcolm Cohen, Julian Edelman, Arlise Ellis, Don Eremin,<br />

Willven Falcon, Angela Grant, Teresa Hasing, Steve Heller, Darrell Henry, Roberta Hershey,<br />

Ken Kaplan, Matthew Katz, Michael Kolba, Silvia Kramer, Imam Mandia, Iris Marcano,<br />

Clarissa McCraley, Clinton Narine, Sandra Narine, Essie Owens, Florence Paau, Joan Pape,<br />

Ronnie Rigas, Gwen Ryals, Ron Schuppert, Raye Schwartz, Beryl Seaforth, Margie Smith, Alan Ulick,<br />

Nina Wintringham; students of Legacy High School, Sean Suarez with fellow Scouts from Island Scout<br />

Troop 59, and members of the Island Girls Project.<br />

Letters deadline for December 1 issue: Tuesday, November 27<br />

After deadline, letters are considered on a space-available basis.<br />

Vol. 28, No. 6<br />

GO TO HELL<br />

Spitzer Spitzer Administration Sends a a<br />

Screw You to Pioneer Pioneer Residents<br />

EDIT EDIT EDITORIAL<br />

EDIT EDIT ORIAL<br />

It’s time for the Spitzer Administration ESDC – gets to pull the trigger.<br />

to start listening to the people of Roosevelt The immediate background of all this is<br />

Island.<br />

reported elsewhere in this issue The of Main<br />

Not only has the Division of HousingStreet<br />

WIRE. The further background is tha<br />

and Community Renewal (DHCR) beenthree<br />

organizations representing the reside<br />

dragging its feet on resident-developed plans of Westview, Island House, and Rivercros<br />

for the <strong>Mitchell</strong>-Lama buildings here, have presented fully workable plans for full<br />

imposing the impractical and impossible in arights<br />

resident ownership to DHCR, while<br />

Big Stall, but now the Empire State DHCR has responded only with vagu<br />

Development Corporation (ESDC) wants to suggestions that funds might be foun<br />

hit the Island’s “affordable” buildings with somewhere to make the repairs necessary<br />

full-scale property taxes.<br />

keep their apartments both liveable an<br />

If this Eliot Spitzer Administration’s affordable forever.<br />

“coordinated housing policy,” it’s a really bad Last week’s total screw-up by ESDC, a<br />

joke, tragically misguided. While one unitloose-cannon<br />

left hand apparently unawa<br />

of State government is calling for long-termof<br />

the policies of the loose-cannon right han<br />

affordability at the likely expense of long- DHCR, demonstrates conclusively that, onc<br />

term occupy-ability, another has set out to again, the people living in the housing hav<br />

destroy present-day affordability. “We havea<br />

much better idea of how to take it into th<br />

to destroy Roosevelt Island to save it,” they future than does any bureaucracy.<br />

seem to be saying, with the only remaining It’s time for the Spitzer Administration to<br />

question being which agency – DHCR or start listening to the people of Roosevelt Island<br />

The Spitzer Administration’s Great Tractor-Pull<br />

To the Editor:<br />

It’s a surprise to see so many<br />

politicians endorsing the Kahn proposal<br />

for our Island. No one I<br />

know who lives here supports it.<br />

And Monday, an endorsement on<br />

the editorial page of The New York<br />

Times. What’s going on!?<br />

I think President Franklin<br />

Delano Roosevelt was a great<br />

President. He’s already memorialized<br />

by the FDR Drive and the<br />

name of our Island. We haven’t forgotten<br />

him.<br />

The Kahn Memorial resembles<br />

the prow of a sunken battleship.<br />

It’s as lyrical as a cinder block.<br />

Times have changed. Islanders<br />

have voted for a natural setting, a<br />

garden of native plants, not a Soviet-style<br />

cementarium.<br />

We the people of Roosevelt Island<br />

have a right and a responsibility<br />

to shape development on our<br />

Island. This is being foisted on us<br />

for reasons we don’t know in opposition<br />

to our wishes. How about<br />

standing up and saying so?<br />

Bill Sinclair<br />

Letters<br />

Letters<br />

To the Editor:<br />

The idea of a second tram<br />

(Mogens Petersen letter, Nov. 3)<br />

from the northern part of the Island<br />

to the Upper East Side of Manhattan<br />

should be seriously considered.<br />

If there are too many obstacles<br />

(government, real estate, etc.), has<br />

anybody ever considered a second<br />

tram that moves people from<br />

Roosevelt Island to Queensboro<br />

Plaza, where you can catch the N/<br />

W/7 trains, or Queens Plaza, where<br />

you can catch the E/G/R/V trains?<br />

Once there, subway connections<br />

can take you to any part of the City.<br />

A second tram to the Upper East<br />

Side would put passengers on the<br />

4/5/6 train or the future 2nd Avenue<br />

subway, somewhere uptown.<br />

Maybe we can even get a 2-for-1<br />

discount price on the new proposed<br />

Tram system.<br />

Even a rush-hour shuttle bus<br />

across the red bridge to the Broadway<br />

or 36th Avenue stations in<br />

Long Island City would relieve<br />

some of the pressure.<br />

Kurt Wittman<br />

To the Editor:<br />

We have been living with the current bus route and, while it’s good<br />

that the bus stops in front of the subway, there is still room for improvement<br />

at the Tram end of the ride. Our quick turnaround was taken away<br />

some time ago by the building construction, and I was thinking that our<br />

current route, around the block, was only temporary, but I was recently<br />

informed there are no plans to go back to the old turnaround, since the<br />

new building will be in the way.<br />

In the meantime, we get on the bus and go for a minute-long, joyless<br />

ride around the block, with the sole purpose of facing in the right direction.<br />

I would like to save myself and my fellow passenger that New<br />

York Minute. (It’s really a minute and a half). If you multiply that by<br />

the number of passengers, then we are wasting a lot of time. We are<br />

tired at the end of the day, we are all running late. We want to get home<br />

and have dinner. <strong>For</strong>tunately, I have discovered a shortcut (see diagram<br />

below). I only wish I had thought of it sooner when they were redoing<br />

the lawn for the Roosevelt Island welcoming kiosk, but: Would it be<br />

possible to build a road that gently goes around the green in front of the<br />

Tram? People would board the bus in the same spot as they do now, and<br />

then it would circle the green and we would be on our way. That would<br />

save us all a lot of time.<br />

With the construction of all the new buildings, why not have one more<br />

piece of construction work, a new road? At least this construction will<br />

not be contributing to more congestion on the Island.<br />

Neal Weissman<br />

MAIN STREET<br />

CROSS-ISLAND ROAD<br />

TRAM<br />

To the Editor:<br />

The WIRE’s headline, Rivercross<br />

Plans Departure From <strong>Mitchell</strong>-<br />

Lama Without Extension of Its<br />

Ground Lease, is misleading. The<br />

article itself makes clear that this<br />

is simply a proposal of a committee<br />

of residents who have labored<br />

long and hard to come up with a<br />

plan, but the headline makes it<br />

seem that the proposal has been<br />

adopted by the governing bodies<br />

of the Rivercross coop. That is not<br />

the case.<br />

The Rivercross Board of Directors<br />

will need to study the proposal<br />

for its legality and financial feasibility,<br />

as well as determine, after<br />

due diligence and review, whether<br />

it serves the best interests of all<br />

shareholders. Any plan to leave<br />

<strong>Mitchell</strong>-Lama would then require<br />

a two-thirds vote of Rivercross’s<br />

360 tenant-shareholder units to<br />

begin a long process that starts with<br />

the filing of a “notice of intent”<br />

with the State. Thereafter, disclosure<br />

documents must be prepared<br />

outlining the plan and its risks,<br />

which must be accepted for filing<br />

by the Attorney General’s office.<br />

Public meetings of shareholders<br />

and officials must take place. Upon<br />

review by legal counsel, consents<br />

may have to be obtained from the<br />

State and Rivercross’s mortgage<br />

lender to proceed without violating<br />

its ground lease, mortgage, and<br />

other obligations. Thus, the<br />

committee’s proposal is just that:<br />

a proposal. Whether it will become<br />

the “Rivercross Plan” after study,<br />

deliberation, consents, votes, and<br />

other procedures are undertaken,<br />

remains to be determined.<br />

Robert Chira<br />

More Letters on page 10<br />

Letters Letters P PPolic<br />

P olic olicy olic<br />

The WIRE welcomes letters of local interest<br />

to the community, and to/from officials.<br />

Requests for Name Withheld publication will<br />

be considered, but the writer’s name, address,<br />

and phone number must be provided<br />

for verification and for our records; letters submitted<br />

anonymously will not be published.<br />

Recommended method of submission:<br />

E-mail to Letters@MainStreetWIRE.com<br />

(plaintext e-mail preferred, or attach a file),<br />

or on a CD left at the desk at 531 Main Street,<br />

addressed to The WIRE. If you e-mail, expect<br />

a confirming response and, if you don’t<br />

receive one, resend and call 212-826-9055<br />

to alert us that it’s been sent. Alternatives:<br />

Typed copy left at the lobby desk at 531 Main<br />

Street; allow extra time for typesetting.<br />

Clearly handwritten letters will be considered,<br />

if brief. We are not able to take telephone<br />

dictation of letters. All letters are subject<br />

to acceptance and editing for length and<br />

clarity. Recommended maximum length,<br />

350 words; longer letters will be considered<br />

if their content merits the required space.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!