EBRD activities in Ukraine - FiFo Ost
EBRD activities in Ukraine - FiFo Ost
EBRD activities in Ukraine - FiFo Ost
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Economic summary<br />
The year 2000 was Ukra<strong>in</strong>e's first full year of economic growth s<strong>in</strong>ce the onset of transition.<br />
GDP growth was much higher than expected. Inflation was also considerably higher, but is<br />
expected to come down <strong>in</strong> 2001. Strong export growth ensured an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the trade and<br />
current account surpluses. FDI was still at a low level, but the target for privatisation<br />
revenues was more than 80 per cent met. The exchange rate held firm and even appreciated<br />
somewhat towards the end of the year. The budget for 2000 provided for a deficit of just<br />
1.8 per cent of GDP and the out-turn was estimated at a deficit of 0.5 per cent of GDP.<br />
A balanced budget for 2001 (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g privatisation revenues) was approved <strong>in</strong> December,<br />
the first time <strong>in</strong> recent years that a budget has been approved on time. The successful<br />
reschedul<strong>in</strong>g of most commercial debts removed the earlier prospect of default. The<br />
prospects for 2001 depend on the successful implementation of structural reforms.<br />
GDP growth<br />
GDP growth was estimated at 6.0 per cent <strong>in</strong> 2000, much higher than expected. The recovery<br />
reflects the strong response of <strong>in</strong>dustry to the earlier decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> the exchange rate, but also the<br />
government's determ<strong>in</strong>ation to promote reform, as well as the emergence <strong>in</strong> the Verkhovna Rada of<br />
a broad coalition more likely to support reform than before. The growth of the economy was driven<br />
by light <strong>in</strong>dustry, the food and paper sectors and heavy <strong>in</strong>dustry. The year 2000 was the first year<br />
of positive growth s<strong>in</strong>ce the transition began. In 2001 a growth figure of 3.5 per cent is forecast,<br />
reflect<strong>in</strong>g a cont<strong>in</strong>uation of demand for exports and stronger domestic demand.<br />
Inflation<br />
Inflation has been higher than expected, at an estimated 28 per cent annual average, partly<br />
because of the National Bank of Ukra<strong>in</strong>e (NBU)'s policy of buy<strong>in</strong>g foreign exchange to meet external<br />
debt commitments, higher oil prices and <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> utility tariffs. Inflation is forecast to come<br />
down to about 16.0 per cent <strong>in</strong> 2001, which would still be higher than the 13.6 per cent projected<br />
by the 2001 budget.<br />
Current account and trade balance<br />
Exports have grown substantially. Ukra<strong>in</strong>e's key trad<strong>in</strong>g partners – Russia, the EU and the US –<br />
recorded economic growth that contributed to the success of the local economy. Strong export<br />
growth ensured an <strong>in</strong>crease of the trade balance surplus to an estimated US$ 779 million and of<br />
the current account surplus to some US$ 1.48 billion or 5.2 per cent of GDP. In 2001, the trade<br />
surplus is forecast to turn <strong>in</strong>to a deficit (-US$ 300 million) and the current account surplus is<br />
expected to narrow (to US$ 510 million) as domestic demand and import growth pick up.<br />
Foreign Direct Investment<br />
Cumulative FDI per capita stood at US$ 78 at the end of 2000. Net FDI <strong>in</strong>flows <strong>in</strong> 2000 stood at an<br />
estimated US$ 594 million, about 19 per cent more than <strong>in</strong> 1999, but less than <strong>in</strong> 1998. The<br />
figure is very low for a country the size of Ukra<strong>in</strong>e and is expected to <strong>in</strong>crease only slightly <strong>in</strong> 2001,<br />
reflect<strong>in</strong>g the persistently difficult <strong>in</strong>vestment climate. While FDI was low, the State Property Fund<br />
has proceeded with privatisations of enterprises via tenders and auctions and raised UAH 2.1<br />
billion (US$ 386 million) <strong>in</strong> revenues for the budget <strong>in</strong> 2000, some 84 per cent of the UAH 2.5<br />
billion (US$ 460 million) targeted. The sale of the Mikolayiv bauxite plant alone brought over UAH 1<br />
Poland<br />
Belarus<br />
Moldova<br />
Romania<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
-5<br />
-10<br />
-15<br />
-20<br />
Ukra<strong>in</strong>e<br />
GDP<br />
% change<br />
Russian<br />
Federation<br />
-25<br />
’93 ’94 ’95 ’96 ’97 ’98 ’99 ’00 ’01<br />
est. proj.<br />
400<br />
300<br />
200<br />
100<br />
1500<br />
1000<br />
500<br />
-500<br />
-1000<br />
Consumer prices<br />
Annual average, % change<br />
0<br />
’95 ’96 ’97 ’98 ’99 ’00 ’01<br />
est. proj.<br />
0<br />
Current account<br />
US$ millions<br />
-1500<br />
’94 ’95 ’96 ’97 ’98 ’99 ’00 ’01<br />
est. proj.<br />
800<br />
600<br />
400<br />
200<br />
Total FDI<br />
US$ millions, cash receipts, net<br />
0<br />
’94 ’95 ’96 ’97 ’98 ’99 ’00 ’01<br />
est.<br />
proj.<br />
Source: <strong>EBRD</strong>, March 2001<br />
Ukra<strong>in</strong>e Investment Profile 5