HUMAN RIGHTS and DIVERSITY IN SEXUAL ... - FTM Australia

More documents

Recommendations

Info

<strong>Australia</strong>n Common Law (1) Re Kevin (2001-2003) “In my view the expert evidence in this case affirms that brain development is (at least) an important determinant of a person’s sense of being a man or a woman. No contrary opinion is expressed. All the experts are very well qualified.” (Chisholm J at para 247)
Re Kevin (2) “In my view the evidence demonstrates (at least on the balance of probabilities) that the characteristics of transsexuals are as much “biological” as those of people thought of as inter-sex”.” Chisholm J - at paragraph 272 Re Kevin: Validity of Marriage of Transsexual (2001) 28 Fam LR 158; [2001] FamCA 1074
Page 1 and 2: HUMAN RIGHTS and DIVERSITY IN SEXUA
Page 3 and 4: Jesus Christ and Transsexualism As
Page 5 and 6: TRANSSEXUALISM an example of human
Page 7 and 8: DIVERSITY IN SEXUAL FORMATION • C
Page 9 and 10: Defining Male and Female (1) “Rec
Page 11 and 12: Defining Male and Female (3) “Tra
Page 13 and 14: Australian Statute Law - Key Issues
Page 15: Australian Statute Law - Key Issues
Page 19 and 20: The Common Law of Australia after R
Page 21 and 22: Human Rights • universal and inal
Page 23 and 24: The Importance of Diversity in Huma
Page 25 and 26: The Language of Human Rights Law Re
Page 27: HUMAN RIGHTS and DIVERSITY IN SEXUA

HUMAN RIGHTS and DIVERSITY IN SEXUAL ... - FTM Australia

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?