22.10.2013 Views

PENAL PROCEDURE CODE In force from 29.04 ... - Legislationline

PENAL PROCEDURE CODE In force from 29.04 ... - Legislationline

PENAL PROCEDURE CODE In force from 29.04 ... - Legislationline

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

commission of Art. 17 of the Law on Execution of Punishments shall be mandatory.<br />

(3) The attendance of the convicted shall be mandatory.<br />

(4) After the gathering and the check of the evidence are completed, the Court shall give the<br />

floor to the body, which has made the proposal.<br />

(5) The prosecutor shall give a conclusion, if the proposal does not come <strong>from</strong> him/her.<br />

(6) The convicted shall speak last.<br />

Determination by the Court<br />

Art. 440. (1) The Court shall rule by a reasoned determination.<br />

(2) Against the determination by the Court, the prosecutor shall be entitled to submit a<br />

challenge which shall be considered under the procedure of Chapter Twenty Two.<br />

New proposal<br />

Art. 441. If the Court does not grant the proposal under Art. 437, a new proposal may be made<br />

no earlier than three months after the day of pronouncing the determination.<br />

Court which shall rule on serving the remainder of the punishment<br />

Art. 442. Where the conditionally released person commits a new offence during the<br />

probationary period, the issues referred to in Art. 70, Para. 7 and 8 shall be decided by the Court, within<br />

the cognisance of which falls the case on the new offence.<br />

Section II.<br />

Cancellation of Taking into Consideration Working Days<br />

Proposal for cancellation<br />

Art. 443. A proposal for cancellation of taking into consideration working days upon<br />

imprisonment under Art. 41, paras 4 and 5 of the Penal Code may make:<br />

1. the district prosecutor in the place of execution of the punishment;<br />

2. the warden.<br />

Consideration of the proposal<br />

Art. 444. (1) The proposal shall be heard by the District Court in the place of serving the term<br />

of imprisonment in a body of a judge and two Court jurors.<br />

(2) The determination by the Court shall be subject to appeal within seven-day period <strong>from</strong><br />

pronouncing it, under the procedure of Chapter Twenty Two.<br />

(3) If the appellate instance cancels the determination, it shall decide the case.<br />

(4) 3) To the extent, to which there are no special rules in this section, the rules of Section I of<br />

this Chapter shall apply.<br />

Section III.<br />

Substitution of the Regime of Serving the Term of Imprisonment for a Heavier One<br />

Proposal for substitution<br />

Art. 445. The proposals for substitution of the regime of serving the term of imprisonment for a<br />

heavier one than that determined by the Court, may be made by:<br />

1. the district prosecutor in the place of punishment;<br />

2. the warden of the prison or of the reformatory institution.<br />

3. a monitoring commission in the place of execution of the punishment.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!