09.11.2013 Views

2009-10 Furbearer Harvest Survey Report - Kansas Department of ...

2009-10 Furbearer Harvest Survey Report - Kansas Department of ...

2009-10 Furbearer Harvest Survey Report - Kansas Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Special Section<br />

The “Special Section” <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Furbearer</strong> <strong>Harvest</strong> <strong>Survey</strong> changes annually and is used to collect<br />

information and opinions from furharvesters on a diversity <strong>of</strong> topics that relate to furharvesting<br />

or furbearers. Past surveys have addressed subjects such as wildlife diseases, trap ownership and<br />

use, and regulatory preferences. Last year, the use <strong>of</strong> snares and body-gripping (conibear) traps<br />

on public lands in <strong>Kansas</strong> was addressed. This year, in the interest <strong>of</strong> keeping the online survey<br />

as short as possible, the special section consisted only <strong>of</strong> a place for comments. A space for<br />

comments was also provided on the paper survey.<br />

Furharvester comments are provided in Appendix 4, and are roughly grouped based on comment<br />

subject. Approximately 325 comments were received. Comments such as these are rarely used<br />

by the <strong>Department</strong> as the primary basis for regulatory change, but rather the <strong>Department</strong> uses<br />

these comments to generally gauge furharvester satisfaction and interests, and to identify<br />

subjects that need further consideration. Typically, a statistically valid survey would then be<br />

conducted, usually within this section <strong>of</strong> this survey, to make a quantified assessment <strong>of</strong><br />

furharvester opinions on the subject. For example, comments might tend to imply furharvesters<br />

may wish for certain season dates. A survey specifically addressing season dates could then be<br />

conducted, and recommended season dates are then determined by the results <strong>of</strong> the survey along<br />

with furbearer population status, pelt primeness periods, and a variety <strong>of</strong> other social and<br />

biological factors.<br />

In the paragraphs below, I’ll address some <strong>of</strong> the most common issues presented by furharvesters<br />

in the comments section. Most <strong>of</strong> these issues have been considered by the <strong>Department</strong> in the<br />

past in one form or another. I hope furharvesters find this information informative, and also take<br />

note that there are conflicting viewpoints for nearly every subject in which more than just a few<br />

people weighed in.<br />

Season Dates – As with other harvest seasons, there has always been some debate over the<br />

appropriate opening and closing dates for various furbearer species. Season dates in <strong>Kansas</strong><br />

have traditionally been set primarily to coincide with the pelt primeness period <strong>of</strong> our most<br />

important furbearer in terms <strong>of</strong> total harvest and pelt value – the raccoon. Though season dates<br />

have been discussed in the past, there has always been opposition to extending the season on<br />

either end due to concern about the harvest <strong>of</strong> unprimed raccoons. However, as bobcat pelt<br />

prices increased through the early 2000’s, furharvester interest in extending the end <strong>of</strong> season<br />

emerged (bobcat, <strong>of</strong> course, is still fully prime when the current season closes). In 2007, the<br />

<strong>Department</strong> surveyed furharvesters on this subject. Less than 40% <strong>of</strong> furharvesters supported an<br />

earlier open season, but almost 65% supported a later closing date. The <strong>Department</strong> has resisted<br />

an earlier opener due, in addition to primeness issues, to an interest in having furharvesting<br />

(trapping) season begin after the upland game season opener, but was more open to the concept<br />

<strong>of</strong> extending the end <strong>of</strong> season at that time. However, bobcat harvest had increased to all-time<br />

highs for several years in a row, and bobcat population indices began to reflect a declining<br />

population. In the interest <strong>of</strong> sustaining harvest numbers, no change in season dates was<br />

recommended. Currently, bobcat pelt prices and harvest effort towards bobcats have declined,<br />

and it now seems reasonable to reconsider extending the season beyond February 15. As more<br />

furharvesters report being denied access to property until after deer or upland game seasons, this

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!