16.11.2013 Views

- 1 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ... - Gilardi & Co, LLC

- 1 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ... - Gilardi & Co, LLC

- 1 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ... - Gilardi & Co, LLC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Case 2:07-cv-02750-CAS-SH Document 196 Filed <strong>11</strong>/<strong>12</strong>/2009 Page 3 of 9<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

<strong>10</strong><br />

<strong>11</strong><br />

<strong>12</strong><br />

<strong>13</strong><br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

<strong>15</strong><br />

<strong>16</strong><br />

<strong>17</strong><br />

<strong>18</strong><br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

24<br />

25<br />

26<br />

27<br />

28<br />

successors-in-interest, or assigns of any such excluded party. Also<br />

excluded from the Class are those Persons who timely and validly<br />

request exclusion from the Class pursuant to the Notice of Pendency and<br />

Proposed Settlement of Class Action.<br />

2. With respect to the Class, this <strong>Co</strong>urt finds that: (a) the members of the<br />

Class are so numerous that joinder of all Class Members is impracticable; (b) there are<br />

questions of law and fact common to members of the Class which predominate over<br />

any individual question; (c) the claims of Lead Plaintiff are typical of the claims of the<br />

Class; (d) Lead Plaintiff and its counsel have fairly and adequately represented and<br />

protected the interests of the respective members of the Class; and (e) a class action is<br />

superior to other available methods for the fair and efficient adjudication of the<br />

controversy considering: (i) the interests of the members of the Class in individually<br />

controlling the prosecution of the separate actions; (ii) the extent and nature of any<br />

litigation concerning the controversy already commenced by members of the Class;<br />

(iii) the desirability or undesirability of concentrating the litigation of these claims in<br />

this particular forum; and (iv) the difficulties likely to be encountered in the<br />

management of the class action.<br />

3. Pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and for the<br />

purposes of settlement only, the <strong>Co</strong>urt certifies NECA-IBEW Pension Fund (The<br />

Decatur Plan) as class representative for the Class. Lead <strong>Co</strong>unsel is authorized to act<br />

on behalf of the Class with respect to all acts required by, or which may be undertaken<br />

pursuant to, the stipulation or such other acts that are reasonably necessary to<br />

consummate the proposed settlement set forth in the Stipulation.<br />

4. The <strong>Co</strong>urt does hereby preliminarily approve the Stipulation and the<br />

settlement set forth therein, subject to further consideration at the Settlement Hearing<br />

described below.<br />

5. A hearing (the “Settlement Hearing”) shall be held before this <strong>Co</strong>urt on<br />

February 22, 20<strong>10</strong>, at <strong>10</strong>:00 a.m., at the United States District <strong>Co</strong>urt, Central District<br />

- 3 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!