Population Dynamics of the St. Marys River Fish Community 1975 ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 8. Catch-per-unit-of-effort (CPUE) of northern pike by age and mean length-at-age at capture for the St. Marys River, August - September, 2006. For comparison, mean length-at-age is included from past surveys and the Michigan state average length-at-age 1 as well as the Ontario Lake Huron 2002 North Channel (ON NC) average 2 . Unit of effort is one 304.8 m gillnet set. Growth index 1 compares length-at-age to state average and the 2006 year to the NC average. It excludes age groups represented by less than 5 specimens. All lengths and the growth index are in mm. CPUE values by age may omit some un-aged fish and therefore may not total to the overall CPUE for this species as reported in Table 2. Age Parameter 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Mean age Mean length Growth index Number 3 30 18 8 9 CPUE 0.07 0.71 0.43 0.19 0.21 Frequency (%) 4.4 44.1 26.5 11.3 12.7 Mean length This survey (2006) 269 429 528 601 642 1.8 491 +13 2002 survey 250 371 455 564 620 669 2.4 477 -34 1995 survey 399 465 538 605 621 722 918 1033 -39 1987 survey 407 468 515 575 672 726 752 754 -39 MI average 422 511 579 635 683 732 780 ON NC 2002 377 483 580 657 749 706 +26 average 1 From Schneider et al. (2000) 2 Ontario MNR, unpublished data 30
Table 9. Catch-per-unit-of-effort (CPUE) of smallmouth bass by age and mean length-at-age at capture for the St. Marys River, August - September, 2006. For comparison, mean length-at-age is included from past surveys and the Michigan state average length-at-age 1 as well as the Ontario Lake Huron 2003 North Channel (ON NC) average 2 . Unit of effort is one 304.8 m gillnet set. Growth index 1 compares length-at-age to state average and excludes age groups represented by less than 5 specimens. All lengths and the growth index are in mm. CPUE values by age may omit some un-aged fish and therefore may not total to the overall CPUE for this species as reported in Table 2. Age Parameter 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Mean age Mean length Growth index Number 26 39 59 35 9 1 4 1 1 1 CPUE 0.62 0.93 1.40 0.83 0.21 0.02 0.10 0.02 0.02 0.02 Frequency (%) 14.8 22.2 33.5 19.9 5.1 0.6 2.3 0.6 0.6 0.6 Mean length This survey (2006) 171 251 282 315 371 391 3.0 273 -18 2002 survey 146 187 222 291 325 376 398 457 457 4.1 281 -61 1995 survey 145 245 263 278 305 340 359 -99 1987 survey 234 268 330 347 371 -72 MI average 178 257 305 356 386 406 434 452 475 ON NC 2003 128 161 175 256 291 240 +60 average 1 From Schneider et al. (2000) 2 Ontario MNR, unpublished data 31
Page 1 and 2: Population Dynamics of the St. Mary
Page 3 and 4: Introduction The St. Marys River ho
Page 5 and 6: weight (Wr; Ney 1999). Growth param
Page 7 and 8: except on walleye in the Lake Georg
Page 9 and 10: 25,000 (Fielder et al. 2002). Based
Page 11 and 12: more in line with the Ontario avera
Page 13 and 14: Information Needs Continued monitor
Page 15 and 16: Ontario Ministry of Natural Resourc
Page 17 and 18: Table 1. Net set locations used to
Page 19 and 20: Table 2 continued. Northern pike 9.
Page 21 and 22: Table 3 continued. White perch 0.16
Page 23 and 24: Table 4 continued. 1995 0.0 ( 0.0)
Page 25 and 26: Table 6. Catch-per-unit-of-effort (
Page 27 and 28: Table 6. Continued. Age Mean age Me
Page 29: Table 7. Catch-per-unit-of-effort (
Page 33 and 34: Table 11. Maturity schedule for fiv
Page 35 and 36: Table 12. Incidence and proportion
Page 37 and 38: Table 14. Percent of sea lamprey wo
Page 39 and 40: Appendix 1. Common and scientific n
Page 41 and 42: Number 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
Page 43: Number 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 e 1

Population Dynamics of the St. Marys River Fish Community 1975 ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?