Participation and partnership: a critical discourse analysis ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

$(Medieunders\370gelse: Muslimer omtales negativt og ensidigt ...$

Extract 1 • M1 asks for solutions not answers, action not information. • M1 + M2 claim recognition as subjects in deliberations on official procedure. • M1 + M2 interweave Genre of open debate with Genre of expert-public interaction. Dialectic between regulation + democracy: democratic logic worked into the regulative form through mixed Genre.
Extract 2 • Hawthorne’ s questions are element in arguments; engages in policy argumentation, using argumentative Genre • Claims recognition as a subject entitled to own strategy on matters of policy. • Arguments identify contradictions in policy • We • Support from audience indicates he speaks for a public.
Page 1 and 2: Participation and partnership: a cr
Page 3 and 4: Outline • Illustration: ‘partic
Page 5 and 6: Regulation and Democracy • Democr
Page 7 and 8: Changing states: tendencies towards
Page 9 and 10: Changing states: tendencies towards
Page 11 and 12: Field of research Objects of trans-
Page 13 and 14: Participatory events: some notes
Page 15 and 16: Crop trials • ‘The objective is
Page 17 and 18: Crop trials • No formal mechanism
Page 19 and 20: Public Involvement • Involvement
Page 21: Extract 1 • M1 making statements
Page 25 and 26: Extract 3 • Questions are element
Page 27 and 28: Conclusions • Public ‘involveme
Page 29 and 30: Conclusions • Suggests that regul

Participation and partnership: a critical discourse analysis ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?