20.12.2013 Views

Retrofit & Replicate - Hyde Housing Association

Retrofit & Replicate - Hyde Housing Association

Retrofit & Replicate - Hyde Housing Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Design Team: ECD Architects are lead designer for the project and are drawing on their sister company,<br />

Keegans, to provide extensive cost consultancy and CDM co-ordinator services. Further consultancy input has<br />

been forthcoming from Parity Projects, with particular responsibility for the data monitoring aspects of the project.<br />

In addition to this quantitative feedback on energy and water use, another of ECD’s sister companies, PPCR,<br />

will undertake post-occupancy evaluation interviews with the incoming tenant providing valuable information on<br />

comfort and satisfaction.<br />

Following interviews and competitive submissions, Mears Ltd were selected as main Contractor partner and<br />

began working with ECD to develop the specification. Mears, in turn, introduced Travis Perkins and Kingspan as<br />

supply chain and technical partners respectively. We are working to a total capital budget of £80k (including VAT<br />

and fees) funded in the main from <strong>Hyde</strong> internal resources but with all partners and product contributors investing<br />

significant resources in the project. A full list of supply partners and their involvement has been included at the end<br />

of this document.<br />

The Existing Property: 225 Court Farm Road is thought to have been<br />

originally constructed in the late 1930’s as part of a large estate development.<br />

The external walls are of cavity wall facing brick construction and the original<br />

dwelling included suspended timber floors and pitched tiled roofs but no<br />

bathroom! Later improvements saw the inclusion of a first floor shower<br />

room, the replacement of open fires with a central heating system of<br />

gas combination boiler with radiators and the addition of a single-storey<br />

rear extension comprising a third bedroom and ensuite bathroom. Fabric<br />

improvements over time have seen the addition of double glazing (though<br />

of poor quality) and 100mm loft insulation to the pitched roof, though the flat<br />

roofed extension included only 25mm mineral wool insulation. A solid concrete<br />

floor replaced the timber in the kitchen and the strip out works found that the<br />

original water supply was via lead piping and an asbestos tank, with no stopcock<br />

found on the premises. Further asbestos was found in the soffit boards.<br />

Initial design proposals investigated the potential for a loft conversion at the property but this was eventually ruled<br />

out due to a lack of headroom. There is an imperative to enlarge the first floor shower room and further space is<br />

required for hot water storage and electrical equipment (inverters, dataloggers etc). SAP assessments were carried<br />

out by ECD Project Services for the property, which was found to have a rating of 60, well above the national<br />

average of 48 and therefore presenting a significant challenge to achieve the 80% reductions. In March 2008,<br />

ECD assigned Heathrow Commissioning to undertake a ‘before’ airtightness test. The purpose of this test was to<br />

provide a ‘base case’ with which to compare the completed scheme and to highlight existing leakage points that<br />

need mitigation. The results were surprising – 9.16 m3/hr/m2 @ 50 pascals, which is better than current building<br />

regulation requirements. The windows were the source of the worst infiltration with poor seals leaking air badly,<br />

followed by incoming services penetrations and the loft access hatch.<br />

According to PHPP software, specific primary energy use (heating, DHW + auxilliary electricity) at the existing<br />

property is estimated to have been 414 kWh/m2/yr with CO 2 emissions rated at 100 kg/m2/yr and space heating<br />

demand rated at 223 kWh/m2/yr.<br />

- 2 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!