31.12.2013 Views

Dialogue, Volume 25, Number 2 - Dialogue – A Journal of Mormon ...

Dialogue, Volume 25, Number 2 - Dialogue – A Journal of Mormon ...

Dialogue, Volume 25, Number 2 - Dialogue – A Journal of Mormon ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

64 DIALOGUE: A JOURNAL OF MORMON THOUGHT<br />

crime, and coercions by General Authorities to hide or neglect an<br />

incriminating fact. But I am more interested in exploring examples <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Mormon</strong> women — particularly those <strong>of</strong> us who consider ourselves liberated<br />

from overt male control —who recognize and attempt to satisfy<br />

our desire to assert autonomy and then unconsciously excise the means,<br />

thereby thwarting our own purposes.<br />

Although <strong>Mormon</strong> women sometimes exhibit signs <strong>of</strong> physical and<br />

sexual abuse, genital mutilation is not culturally mandated or acceptable.<br />

The clitoris's presence does represent possibility. Metaphorically,<br />

we women on the Ouelessebougou expedition realized many <strong>of</strong> these<br />

possibilities. First, we were in Africa. Thus, we had the freedom to<br />

travel beyond our domestic environment. Except for the board<br />

chairman's wife, who came primarily to accompany her husband, each<br />

<strong>of</strong> us knew that we were able to be there because we had economic<br />

means derived from an education and the ability to use skills to earn<br />

and manage an income. Granted, our group was not typical; again<br />

with the exception <strong>of</strong> the chairman's wife, we others were all single<br />

and over thirty years old; only two <strong>of</strong> us had children. Had we been<br />

married, most <strong>of</strong> us likely would not have been on that expedition. We<br />

seemed free from the sexual hegemony that marks the Bambara women<br />

both psychically and physically. Yet we are only slowly admitting<br />

that <strong>Mormon</strong> sociological patterns for both sexes may be psychically<br />

suffocating and ultimately destructive. Witness documented depression<br />

among housewives, fear among homosexuals, and attempts to<br />

suppress symposia and honest speaking from people who believe that<br />

the glory <strong>of</strong> God is intelligence. Furthermore, sexual hegemony exists<br />

no less in the <strong>Mormon</strong> culture than in the Bambara. Regardless <strong>of</strong><br />

secular leadership possibilities open to women, authorities in the LDS<br />

Church feel more compelled now than ever before to control Church<br />

structure, capital, ritual, and administration. And LDS women feel<br />

compelled, no matter how "liberated" we may regard ourselves, to<br />

allow men that privilege.<br />

Frustrated by the sexual discrimination she observed in early<br />

twentieth-century America, anthropologist Elsie Clewes Parsons noted<br />

that "women cooperate in their own subjection ... by trying 'hard<br />

to live down to what is expected <strong>of</strong> them' " (in Rosenberg 1982, 172).<br />

Philosopher Antonio Gramsci observed that hegemony works from<br />

both directions: a group dominates only with permission from subgroups.<br />

Subordinate groups, be they racial, ethnic, religious, economic,<br />

or gendered, may resist suppression with language and action, but<br />

until they actually revolt (and risk becoming tyrannical themselves),<br />

they primarily acquiesce to or support the ruling order (Lears 1985,<br />

568-78).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!