02.01.2014 Views

Professionalism of News Workers - Grady College of Journalism and ...

Professionalism of News Workers - Grady College of Journalism and ...

Professionalism of News Workers - Grady College of Journalism and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Pr<strong>of</strong>essionalism</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>News</strong> <strong>Workers</strong>: The Creation <strong>and</strong> Evolution <strong>of</strong> the Concept Page 12<br />

Idsvoog <strong>and</strong> Hoyt (1977) used the McLeod <strong>and</strong> Hawley instrument in a field survey <strong>of</strong> 81<br />

journalists in six Wisconsin markets to measure the pr<strong>of</strong>essionalism <strong>and</strong> the job dissatisfaction <strong>of</strong> the<br />

respondents. In addition, Idsvgood <strong>and</strong> Hoyt examined their job performance through the evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />

mistakes the respondents found in two television newsfilm scripts. As predicted, the journalists who<br />

scored high in pr<strong>of</strong>essionalism were more likely to find errors in the scripts than those who scored low in<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essionalism. No difference between groups was found in terms <strong>of</strong> job dissatisfaction. Consistent with<br />

studies <strong>of</strong> print journalists, Idsvoog <strong>and</strong> Hoyt found that broadcast journalists who scored high in<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essionalism were less likely than the others to be willing to leave television news for a higher paying<br />

job outside television.<br />

Garrison <strong>and</strong> Salwen (1989) also employed the McLeod <strong>and</strong> Hawley scale to examine the<br />

perceptions <strong>of</strong> 249 sports editors <strong>of</strong> the sports journalists’ pr<strong>of</strong>essional orientations. In addition, the<br />

sports journalists editors were asked to assess the pr<strong>of</strong>essional orientations <strong>of</strong> their colleagues who<br />

write hard news <strong>and</strong> s<strong>of</strong>t news. The results suggested that sports editors view the sports journalists as<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essionals who possess traits that are comparable with the pr<strong>of</strong>essional traits <strong>of</strong> the journalists who<br />

report hard news <strong>and</strong> s<strong>of</strong>t news.<br />

Additional Work Outside the U.S.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essionalization <strong>of</strong> journalism <strong>and</strong> the consequences <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essionalism have been<br />

prominent in the German mass communication literature (Kepplinger <strong>and</strong> Vohl, 1979; Weischenberg,<br />

15<br />

1995). As in the United States, a primary concern has been the extent to which journalism meets<br />

some st<strong>and</strong>ard <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essionalism. The conclusion most <strong>of</strong>ten reached, according to Weischenberg<br />

(1995) is that it does not. This discussion depends heavily on the sociological literature on occupations<br />

from the 1950s <strong>and</strong> 1960s in the United States <strong>and</strong> in Germany.<br />

The German literature has also examined the individual consequences <strong>of</strong> occupational<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essionalization by looking at what Kepplinger <strong>and</strong> Voll (1979) call pr<strong>of</strong>essional norms. Kepplinger<br />

<strong>and</strong> Voll draw from the work <strong>of</strong> Johnstone, Slawski <strong>and</strong> Bowman (1972) rather than from the work <strong>of</strong><br />

15<br />

Weischenberg credits McLeod <strong>and</strong> his students with having had great impact on the study in<br />

Germany <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essionalism among journalists (p. 493).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!