09.01.2014 Views

Quantum Mechanics ¯h = 1.0545716 10 kg m sec

Quantum Mechanics ¯h = 1.0545716 10 kg m sec

Quantum Mechanics ¯h = 1.0545716 10 kg m sec

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Contents<br />

0 Words 5<br />

0.1 <strong>Quantum</strong> mechanics past, leading to present . . . . . . . . . . . . 5<br />

0.2 A road map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6<br />

0.3 Exercise 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8<br />

1 States 9<br />

1.1 The state of a system : ket notation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9<br />

1.2 The superposition principle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <strong>10</strong><br />

1.3 Matrix notation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12<br />

1.4 Bases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12<br />

1.5 The probability interpretation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13<br />

1.6 The measurement problem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14<br />

1.7 Bra’s and inner products : the Hilbert space . . . . . . . . . . . . 15<br />

1.8 Playing with light . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18<br />

1.9 Exercises 1 to 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20<br />

2 Observables 23<br />

2.1 A measurement with a specific result . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23<br />

2.2 A measurement with a general result . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24<br />

2.3 Using probability theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25<br />

2.4 Hermitean operators and eigenstuff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26<br />

2.5 Observables as matrices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28<br />

2.6 This is not a measurement ! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29<br />

2.7 Degeneracy of eigenvalues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30<br />

2.8 What is a classical observable ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30<br />

2.9 Exercises 7 to 16 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32<br />

3 Systems of observables 36<br />

3.1 More than one property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36<br />

3.2 The commutator of two operators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36<br />

3.3 Commensurable observables and common bases . . . . . . . . . . 37<br />

3.4 Complete commensurable sets of observables . . . . . . . . . . . 38<br />

3.5 Incommensurability and information loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39<br />

3.6 Commensurability and state labelling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40<br />

3.7 The Heisenberg inequality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41<br />

3.8 Extra ! The Mermin-Peres magic square . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43<br />

3.9 Exercises 17 to 21 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44<br />

4 Does reality have properties ? 47<br />

4.1 The question at issue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47<br />

4.2 The EPR paradox . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47<br />

4.2.1 EPR’s thought experiment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47<br />

4.2.2 Entangled states . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48<br />

4.3 Bell’s inequalities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!