14.01.2014 Views

Annual Report on Fair Housing FY 2009 - HUD

Annual Report on Fair Housing FY 2009 - HUD

Annual Report on Fair Housing FY 2009 - HUD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Annual</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Fair</strong> <strong>Housing</strong><br />

<strong>FY</strong> <strong>2009</strong><br />

Table of C<strong>on</strong>tents<br />

A Message from the Assistant Secretary ................................................................................................................. 5<br />

About This <str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g> .................................................................................................................................................... 7<br />

Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................. 9<br />

State of <strong>Fair</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> .............................................................................................................................................. 13<br />

<strong>HUD</strong> Enforcement of the <strong>Fair</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> Act ............................................................................................................ 19<br />

<strong>Housing</strong> Discriminati<strong>on</strong> Complaints ................................................................................................................... 20<br />

Chart 1: Complaints Filed with <strong>HUD</strong> and FHAP Agencies (<strong>FY</strong> 2006-<strong>FY</strong> <strong>2009</strong>)................................................ 21<br />

Bases of Complaints ........................................................................................................................................... 21<br />

Table 1: Bases of <strong>HUD</strong> and FHAP Complaints (<strong>FY</strong> 2006-<strong>FY</strong> <strong>2009</strong>) ................................................................. 22<br />

Table 2: Bases of <strong>HUD</strong> Complaints (<strong>FY</strong> 2006-<strong>FY</strong> <strong>2009</strong>) .................................................................................. 24<br />

Table 3: Bases of FHAP Complaints (<strong>FY</strong> 2006-<strong>FY</strong> <strong>2009</strong>) ................................................................................. 25<br />

Issues in Complaints ........................................................................................................................................... 25<br />

Table 4: Issues in <strong>HUD</strong> and FHAP Complaints (<strong>FY</strong> 2006-<strong>FY</strong> <strong>2009</strong>) ................................................................. 26<br />

Table 5: Issues in <strong>HUD</strong> Complaints (<strong>FY</strong> 2006-<strong>FY</strong> <strong>2009</strong>) .................................................................................. 28<br />

Table 6: Issues in FHAP Complaints (<strong>FY</strong> 2006-<strong>FY</strong> <strong>2009</strong>) ................................................................................ 29<br />

Compliance with Notice Requirements………………………………………………………………………………………………………...26<br />

Complaint Closures ............................................................................................................................................ 30<br />

Chart 2: <strong>HUD</strong> and FHAP Complaints Closed (<strong>FY</strong> 2006-<strong>FY</strong> <strong>2009</strong>) .................................................................... 31<br />

Chart 3: <strong>HUD</strong> and FHAP Complaint Outcomes, by Type (<strong>FY</strong> 2006-<strong>FY</strong> <strong>2009</strong>) , ................................................. 32<br />

Chart 4: <strong>HUD</strong> Complaint Outcomes, by Type (<strong>FY</strong> 2006-<strong>FY</strong> <strong>2009</strong>) .................................................................. 33<br />

Chart 5: FHAP Complaint Outcomes, by Type (<strong>FY</strong> 2006-<strong>FY</strong> <strong>2009</strong>)................................................................. 34<br />

Timeliness of Investigati<strong>on</strong>s ............................................................................................................................... 34<br />

Chart 6: <strong>HUD</strong> and FHAP Newly Aged Complaints (<strong>FY</strong> 2006-<strong>FY</strong> <strong>2009</strong>) ........................................................... 35<br />

Adjudicating <strong>Fair</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> Act Complaints ......................................................................................................... 35<br />

Table 7: <strong>Fair</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> Act Caseload (<strong>FY</strong> <strong>2009</strong>) ............................................................................................... 36<br />

Table 8: Administrative Outcomes (<strong>FY</strong> <strong>2009</strong>) ................................................................................................ 36<br />

Table 9: Post-Charge C<strong>on</strong>sent Orders (<strong>FY</strong> <strong>2009</strong>) ........................................................................................... 37<br />

Commencement of Administrative Hearings..................................................................................................... 37<br />

Issuance of ALJ Decisi<strong>on</strong>s ................................................................................................................................... 37<br />

Table 10: ALJ Decisi<strong>on</strong> (<strong>FY</strong> <strong>2009</strong>) ................................................................................................................... 37<br />

Cases Elected to DOJ .......................................................................................................................................... 37<br />

Table 11: Outcomes of Cases Elected to DOJ (<strong>FY</strong> <strong>2009</strong>) ............................................................................... 38<br />

Secretary-Initiated Enforcement ....................................................................................................................... 38<br />

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!