CPD Monitoring Handbook 6509.2 Rev-6 - OneCPD

More documents

Recommendations

Info

6509.2 REV-6 Exhibit 8-4 Homelessness Prevention and Rapid Re-Housing Program (HPRP) 2. Does a review of the program participant files reveal adequate documentation that all individuals or families served are at or below 50 percent of the Area Median Income (AMI) upon entry into the program? [HPRP Notice – Section IV. Requirements for Funding (D). Eligible Program Participants (2) Requirements for all Program Participants (2)] Describe Basis for Conclusion: Yes No N/A 3. Does a review of the program participant files reveal adequate documentation that the individuals or families were either homeless or at risk of losing their housing and were (1) without appropriate subsequent housing options and (2) without financial resources and support networks needed to obtain immediate housing or remain in its existing housing? [HPRP Notice – Section IV. Requirements for Funding (D) Eligible Program Participants (2) Requirements for all Program Participants (3)] Describe Basis for Conclusion: Yes No N/A 04/2010 8-2
Exhibit 8-5 6509.2 REV-6 Homelessness Prevention and Rapid Re-Housing Program (HPRP) Guide for Review of HPRP Subgrantee Management Name of Grantee: Staff Consulted: Program Year: Name(s) of Reviewer(s) Date NOTE: All questions that address requirements contain the citation for the source of the requirement (statute, regulation, Consolidated Plan/IDIS, or grant agreement). If the requirement is not met, HUD must make a finding of noncompliance. All other questions (questions that do not contain the citation for the requirement) do not address requirements, but are included to assist the reviewer in understanding the participant's program more fully and/or to identify issues that, if not properly addressed, could result in deficient performance. Negative conclusions to these questions may result in a "concern" being raised, but not a "finding." Instructions: This Exhibit is designed to review the HPRP grantee’s management and oversight of its subgrantees. It is separated into two sections (Subgrantee Program Management and Subgrantee Financial Management). HUD reviewers should select a sample of subgrantees for a program year following the instructions for sampling in Section 8-3.C of the introductory text to this Chapter. The information in the file documentation, supplemented with grantee and subgrantee staff interviews, is to be used to answer the questions below. If the monitoring is onsite and time and resources permit, HUD reviewers should supplement this review with on-site subgrantee visits. Questions: A. SUBGRANTEE PROGRAM MANAGEMENT 1. Did the grantee select subgrantees in accordance with 24 CFR part 85, and the grantee’s plan for distribution, administration, and oversight of funds identified in its Substantial Amendment to the Consolidated Plan 2008 Action Plan for HPRP? [HPRP Notice – Section V. Post-Award Process Requirements (F) Responsibility for Grant Administration, Section VII. Other Federal Requirements (G) Uniform Administrative Requirements, and 24 CFR 85.37] Describe Basis for Conclusion: Yes No N/A 8-1 04/2010
Page 1 and 2: HANDBOOK 6509.2 REV-6 U.S. DEPARTME
Page 3 and 4: CHAPTER 8 TABLE OF CONTENTS ECONOMI
Page 5 and 6: 6509.2 REV-6 A. Program Overview. H
Page 7 and 8: 6509.2 REV-6 Eligible grantees are
Page 9 and 10: 6509.2 REV-6 Eligible grantees are
Page 11 and 12: 6509.2 REV-6 3. The reviewer may al
Page 13 and 14: 6509.2 REV-6 i. Include a file or f
Page 15 and 16: 6509.2 REV-6 Exhibit 8-1 Homelessne
Page 21: Exhibit 8-4 6509.2 REV-6 Homelessne
Page 25 and 26: Exhibit 8-5 6509.2 REV-6 Homelessne
Page 43 and 44: Exhibit 8-10 6509.2 REV-6 NSP-1 Pro
Page 53 and 54: 6509.2 REV-6 Exhibit 8-11 NSP-1 Pro
Page 73 and 74:
6509.2 REV-6 Exhibit 8-16 NSP-1 Pro
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81:
6509.2 REV-6 Exhibit 8-18 CDBG-R Pr
show all

CPD Monitoring Handbook 6509.2 Rev-6 - OneCPD

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?