EK Panel Meeting minutes January 2012 - Hyde Housing Association
EK Panel Meeting minutes January 2012 - Hyde Housing Association
EK Panel Meeting minutes January 2012 - Hyde Housing Association
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Minutes<br />
Actions<br />
1.<br />
1.1<br />
Welcome and Introductions<br />
Welcome from AB, introductions around the table. CR informed the panel<br />
that Jeff Matthews (JM), an experienced temporary <strong>Housing</strong> Officer, is<br />
currently managing Kelly Bristow’s patch whist she is on maternity leave,<br />
following the departure of David Greenway.<br />
2.<br />
2.1<br />
Election of Chair<br />
At the meeting on the 11 th October 2011 it was agreed by the panel that KI<br />
and AB would share responsibilities and chair alternate meetings. KI sent her<br />
apologies for the meeting, so it was therefore decided that AB chair today’s<br />
meeting.<br />
3.<br />
3.1<br />
3.2<br />
Minutes of the last meeting and matters arising<br />
12.8 – FG at the last meeting to arrange visit to JR to inspect the suitability of<br />
his loft for insulation. FG visited JR and meeting was arranged with<br />
contractor but FG is not yet aware of the outcome.<br />
Minutes of the previous meeting were agreed as a true record.<br />
4.<br />
Staff Reports<br />
4.1<br />
4.2<br />
4.3<br />
Mandy Apps – <strong>Housing</strong> Officer - panel feedback / questions following<br />
report<br />
MA apologised to the panel that the estate inspection figures requested at<br />
the last meeting were not included in the reports. She explained that this<br />
information is easy to access and will be provided for the next set of reports<br />
produced for the panel. MA suggested that contact is made with Claudine<br />
Collins-Hermanstein. JB to speak with CC-H to develop relevant and<br />
comparable statistics for inclusion in future reports.<br />
MA also provided clarification that EI’s are designed to score communal<br />
areas, CR adding that one of the aims is to monitor the performance of<br />
contractors and grounds maintenance. Final scores will not necessarily be<br />
affected by individual poorly maintained gardens.<br />
For each area scores are rated between zero and four and computer<br />
programme Snap generates the overall estate rating. The panel asked for<br />
the EI scoring sheet to be brought to the next meeting. JB to obtain a copy<br />
of the form and distribute to the panel at the next meeting.<br />
JB<br />
JB<br />
5.<br />
5.1<br />
Jeff Matthews – <strong>Housing</strong> Officer - panel feedback / questions following<br />
report<br />
JM highlighted an error in the report provided to the panel. The <strong>Housing</strong><br />
Officer Fund section is incorrect and has used SB’s area examples of funds<br />
used.<br />
2