17.01.2014 Views

Environmental impact assessment in Nigeria - International ...

Environmental impact assessment in Nigeria - International ...

Environmental impact assessment in Nigeria - International ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PROPONENT<br />

FEASIBILITY STUDY OR PROJECT PROPOSAL<br />

FEPA EIA SECRETARIAT<br />

INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION<br />

MANDATORY PROJECTS<br />

OTHERS<br />

CLASSIFIED PROJECTS<br />

EXCLUDED PROJECTS<br />

PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT<br />

SCREENING<br />

SCOPING<br />

NO EIA REQUIRED<br />

DRAFT EIA REPORT<br />

PUBLIC HEARING<br />

REVIEW PANEL<br />

REVIEW REPORT<br />

PROPONENT<br />

MEDIATION<br />

Not approved<br />

FINAL EIA REPORT<br />

TECHNICAL COMMITTEE<br />

Decision mak<strong>in</strong>g committee<br />

approved<br />

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (EIS) AND CERTIFICATION<br />

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT MONITORING<br />

PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION<br />

COMMISSION<br />

AUDIT<br />

Figure 2: Flow chart of FEPA EIA procedures<br />

Public participation is not statutorily protected yet current realities have<br />

encouraged public <strong>in</strong>volvement as the communities have become aware of<br />

the need to protect the environment. Though largely illiterate and poor, and<br />

thereby vulnerable to monetary <strong>in</strong>ducement <strong>in</strong> the hands of unscrupulous<br />

proponents, nevertheless their knowledge of the locality can enhance the<br />

process. In this regard the law should be reviewed.<br />

FEPA usually <strong>in</strong>volves the State EPAs only at the review stage and it has<br />

been observed that this angers them, prompt<strong>in</strong>g a demand for a repeat of the<br />

EIA study by the proponent, with its attendant resources wastes. Often they<br />

refused to attend public forums as FEPA officials are usually absent from<br />

these. The illiterate public, left to the mercy of the proponent, is misled. It is<br />

suggested that FEPA should <strong>in</strong>volve the relevant State EPA at the secretariat<br />

stage i.e. when the proponent submits the proposal so as to enable them to<br />

monitor and participate actively <strong>in</strong> the entire process and not only <strong>in</strong> the<br />

review. In this regard, on receipt of the project proposal, FEPA should send<br />

72<br />

UNEP EIA Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Resource Manual ® Case studies from develop<strong>in</strong>g countries

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!